Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Microsurgical anatomy of branches of musculocutaneous nerve: clinical relevance for spastic elbow surgery

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The neurotomy of musculocutaneous nerve is a treatment for patients who suffer from spastic elbow flexion when medical and reeducative treatments have failed. It consists in sectioning motor branches of musculocutaneous nerve which are destined to the biceps brachii and brachialis muscles, both being the main elbow flexor muscles. The aim of this study was to analyse the distance, where each motor branch arises from the musculocutaneous nerve to both biceps brachii and brachialis muscles, to establish precisely the localisation and length of the necessary incision to reach its branches for surgery.

Materials and methods

Eighteen musculocutaneous nerves from ten cadavers were dissected. None of them reported with a previous pathology. The cadavers were laid on the back with 30–35° of abduction, a complete extension, and supination of the upper limb.

Results

The localization of motor branches was to be found in the middle third of the upper arm, with an average from the base of the humeral major tubercle of 11.46, 12.40, and 12.87 cm for the biceps brachii and 16.36, 19.10, and 16.88 cm for the brachialis muscle.

Conclusion

The incision needed to reach the motor branches of the musculocutaneous nerve should be localised between 10 and 20 cm from the major humeral tubercle and may be shorter than usual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Netter FH (2011) Atlas d’anatomie humaine, Section VI, Membre supérieur, 5ème edition. Elsevier-Masson, Issy-les-Moulineaux, pp 400–404, 442–443

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kamina P (2009) Anatomie clinique, Tome 1, Anatomie générale-membres, 4ème edition. Maloine, pp 122–128, 219–222, 265–268, 293–314

  3. Lazorthes G (1981) Le système nerveux périphérique, 3ème edition. Masson, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  4. Sunderland S (1972) Nerves and Nerve Injuries. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  5. Carlson MG, Hearns KA, Inkellis E, Leach ME (2011) Early results of surgical intervention for elbow deformity in cerebral palsy based on degree of contracture. J Hand Surg-am 37(8):1665–1671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gracies JM, Bayle N, Goldberg S, Simpson DM (2014) Botulinum toxin type B in the spastic arm: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, preliminary study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95(7):1303–1311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Takekawa T, Abo M, Ebihara K, Taguchi K, Sase Y, Kakuda W (2013) Long-term effects of injection of botulinum toxin type A combined with home-based functional training for post-stroke patients with spastic upper limb hemiparesis. Acta Neurol Belg 113(4):469–475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Buxton N (2011) Neurosurgical management of spasticity. Paediatr Child Health 21(10):473–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Maarrawi J, Mertens, Sindou M (2005) Surgery in the peripheral nerves for upper limb spasticity. Oper Tech Neurosurg 7(3):147–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Puligopu AK1, Purohit AK (2011) Outcome of selective motor fasciculotomy in the treatment of upper limb spasticity. J Pediatr Neurosci 6:S118–S125

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Bird SJ (2014) The musculocutaneous nerve. Encycl Neurol Sci 215–216:303–304

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee JH, Kim HW, Im S, An X, Lee MS, Lee UY, Han SH (2009) Localization of motor entry points and terminal intramuscular nerve endings of the musculocutaneous nerve to biceps and brachialis muscles. Surg Radiol Anat 32(3):213–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. IlayperumaI, Nanayakkara BG, Hasan R, Uluwitiya SM, Palahepitiya KN (2015) Coracobrachialis muscle: morphology, morphometry and gender differences. Surg Radiol Anat. doi:10.1007/s00276-015-1564-y

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gümüşalan Y, Yazar F, Ozan H (1998) Variant innervation of the coracobrachialis muscle and unusual course of the musculocutaneous nerve in man. Kaibogaku Zasshi 73(3):269–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Remerand F, Laulan J, Couvret C, Palud M, Baud A, Velut S, Laffon M, Fusciardi J (2010) Is the musculocutaneous nerve really in the coracobrachialis muscle when performing an axillary block? An ultrasound study. Anesth Analg 110:1729–1734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sung-Yoon W, Young-Hoon C, You-Jin C, Vittorio F, Hee-Soon W, Ki-Yeon C, Kyung-Seok H, Hee-Jin K (2015) Intramuscular innervation patterns of the brachialis muscle. Clin Anat 28:123–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cage TA, Simon NG, Bourque S, Noss R, Engstrom JW, Ralph JW, Kliot M (2013) Dual reinnervation of biceps muscle after side-to-side anastomosis of an intact median nerve and a damaged musculocutaneous nerve. J Neurosurg 119(4):929–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kjelstrup T, Sauter AR, Hol PK (2015) The relationship of the musculocutaneous nerve to the brachial plexus evaluated by MRI. J Clin Monit Comp. doi:10.1007/s10877-015-9807-3

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lafosse T, Masmejean E, Bihel T, Lafosse L (2015) Brachial plexus endoscopic dissection and correlation with open dissection. Chir Main 34(6):286–293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Sethi PM, Vadasdi K, Greene RT, Vitale MA, Duong M, Miller SR (2015) Safety of open suprapectoral and subpectoral biceps tenodesis: an anatomic assessment of risk for neurologic injury. J Shoulder Elb Surg 24:138–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Pianezza A, Salces y Nedeo A, Chaynes P, Bickler PE, Minville V (2012) The emergence level of the musculocutaneous nerve from the brachial plexus: implications for infraclavicular nerve blocks. Anesth Analg 114(5):1131–1133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Organogenesis and Anatomy, Universite de Picardie Jules Verne, 3 rue des Louvels, 80036, Amiens, France

    C. Thieffry, L. Chenin, P. Foulon, E. Havet & J. Peltier

Authors
  1. C. Thieffry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. Chenin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. P. Foulon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Havet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. J. Peltier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Thieffry.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thieffry, C., Chenin, L., Foulon, P. et al. Microsurgical anatomy of branches of musculocutaneous nerve: clinical relevance for spastic elbow surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 39, 773–778 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1800-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-016-1800-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation