Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Edentulousness in relation to remodeling of the gonial angles and incisures in dentate and edentate mandibles: morphometric study using the Image J software

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The human mandible is subject to stimuli during its growth phase and also in adulthood. One of these stimuli may be absence of teeth, which gives rise to mandibular remodeling. Morphological changes may occur in different areas of this bone, such as in the gonial, condylar and ramus regions.

Objective

To investigate the influence of edentulousness on remodeling of the gonial angle of the mandible and the angle formed by the mandibular incisure.

Materials and method

Eighty-five dry mandibles from adults were examined: 42 from males and 43 from females. The mandibles were photographed using a camera coupled to a static support that was positioned 20 cm from the object to be photographed. The images were digitized and transferred to the Image J 1.42q software, in which the gonial angle of the mandible and the mandibular incisure angle were measured.

Results

There were no differences in the mandibular and mandibular incisure angles in relation to presence or absence of teeth, or between the right and left sides. The mandibular incisure angle was greater in the women.

Conclusion

Edentulousness did not cause remodeling of the gonial angle of the mandible or in the mandibular incisure angle.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

ÂG:

Gonial angle of the mandible

ÂI:

Mandibular incisure angle

MVÂI:

Mean value mandibular incisure angle

MVÂG:

Mean value gonial angle of the mandible

References

  1. Ayoub F, Rizk A, Yehya M, Cassia A, Chartouni S, Atiyeh F, Majzoub Z (2009) Sexual dimorphism of mandibular angle in a lebanese sample. J Forensic Leg Med 16(3):121–124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Carlini JL, Gomes KU (2005) Diagnóstico e tratamento das assimetrias dentofaciais. R Dental Press Ortodon Ortop Facial 10(1):18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Carvalho AAF (2000) Avaliação da simetria da imagem do ramo da mandíbula em radiografias panorâmicas. Pesqui Odontol Bras 14(3):248–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ceylan G, Yaníkoglu N, Yílmaz AB, Ceylan Y (1998) Changes in the mandibular angle in the dentulous and edentulous states. J Prosthet Dent 80(6):680–684

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dutra V, Devlin H, Susin C, Yang J, Horner K, Fernandes AR (2006) Mandibular morphological changes in low bone mass edentulous females: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102(5):663–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Edwards LF (1954) The edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 4(2):222–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Enlow DH, Bianco HJ, Eklund S (1976) The remodeling of the edentulous mandible. J Prosthet Dent 36(6):685–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gosh S, Vengal M, Pai KM (2009) Remodeling of the human mandible in the gonial angle region: a panoramic, radiographic, cross-sectional study. Oral Radiol 25:2–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huumonen S, Sipila K, Haikola B, Tapio M, Soderholm AL, Remes-Lyly T, Oikarinen K, Raustia AM (2010) Influence of edentulousness on gonial angle, ramus and condylar height. J Oral Rehabil 37(1):34–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ingervall B, Thilander B (1974) Relation between facial morphology and activity of masticatory muscles. J Oral Rehabil 1(2):131–147

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Karoshah MAA, Almadani O, Ghaleb SS, Zaki MK, Fattah YAA (2010) Sexual dimorphism of the mandible in a modern Egyptian population. J Forensic Leg Med 17(4):213–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Maroco J, Garcia-Marques T (2006) Qual a fiabilidade do alfa de Cronbach? Questõesantigas e soluçõesmodernas? Lab Psicologia 4(1):65–90

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mulick JF (1965) An investigation of craniofacial asymmetry using the serial twin-study method. Am J Orthod 51:112–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ohm E, Silness J (1999) Size of the mandibular jaw angle related to age, toothretention and gender. J Oral Rehabil 26(11):883–891

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Osato S, Kuroyama I, Nakajima S, Ogawa T, Misaki K (2012) Differences in 5 anatomic parameters of mandibular body morphology by gonial angle size in dentulous Japanese subjects. Ann Anat 194(5):446–451

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Raustia AM, Pirttiniemi P, Salonen MA, Pyhtinen J (1998) Effect of the edentulousness on mandibular size and condyle-fossa position. J Oral Rehabil 25(3):174–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Raustia AM, Salonen MA (1997) Gonial angles and condylar and ramus height of the mandible in complete denture wearers—a panoramic radiograph study. J Oral Rehabil 24(7):512–516

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rocha JC, Castilho JCM, Moraes LC, Faig-Leite H (2000) Estudo radiográfico da assimetria da fossa mandibular em crânios secos de crianças. Rev Odontol UNESP 29(1/2):205–219

    Google Scholar 

  19. Santos SH, Morosolli, ARC (2007) Análise da assimetria mandibular associada a alterações condilares por meio de radiografia panorâmica. SOTAU R virtual Odontol 1(1):23–27

  20. Sousa JC, Machado FA, Silva PAP, Cardinot TM, Babinski MA (2006) Correlation of the gonial angle with condylar measurements on dry mandible: a morphometric study for a clinical–surgical and physiotherapeutic practices. Eur J Anat 10(3):91–96

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xie QF, Ainamo A (2004) Correlation of gonial angle size with cortical thickness, height of the mandibular residual body, and duration of edentulism. J Prosthet Dent 91(5):477–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Ailton Vieira Santos, José Bispo da Silva and Eufrasio dos Santos Cardoso, technicians from the anatomy laboratory, for their support in preparing of the bones and to the Institutional Program of Scientific Initiation Scholarships (PIBIC) of the Federal University of Sergipe.

Conflict of interest

The paper has not been submitted for publication elsewhere and all authors were fully involved in the study and preparation of the manuscript. There is no conflict of interest also.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to José Aderval Aragão.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aragão, J.A., Souto, M.L.S., Mateus, C.R.S. et al. Edentulousness in relation to remodeling of the gonial angles and incisures in dentate and edentate mandibles: morphometric study using the Image J software. Surg Radiol Anat 36, 889–894 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1335-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-014-1335-1

Keywords

Navigation