Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The gluteal sling: an anatomical study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

Sciatic nerve palsy is a devastating complication which may be seen after acetabular exposure in total hip resurfacing via a posterior approach. An anatomical structure termed as the “gluteal sling” was suggested to play a role in sciatic nerve palsies during this operation. “Gluteal sling” is formed by the attachment of the deep fibers of the inferior part of the gluteus maximus on the gluteal tuberosity of the femur and the lateral intermuscular septum. It is suggested to be released to avoid such compressive injuries. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how much of the gluteal sling should be released to decrease the tension on sciatic nerve during posterior hip arthroplasties. We also aimed to study the anatomical structures at risk during releasing procedure.

Materials and methods

The gluteal sling was examined in 17 sides of 9 adult cadavers. Its relation with the sciatic nerve, first perforating artery, the tip of greater trochanter and the ischial tuberosity were evaluated.

Results

The closest distance between the gluteal sling and the sciatic nerve was measured as 1.9 ± 0.6 cm. This point was corresponding to the distal 2/3 part of the gluteal sling. The distance of the proximal edge of the gluteal sling to the first perforating artery was 3.7 ± 0.9 cm, while its ascending branch was closer, being 1.8 ± 0.8 cm.

Conclusions

Theoretically, it is enough to release the proximal 2/3 of the gluteal sling to avoid its compression on the sciatic nerve. However, further clinical studies would need to be undertaken to properly determine the effects of this procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Black DL, Reckling FW, Porter SS (1991) Somatosensory- evoked potential monitored during total hip arthro- plasty. Clin Orthop 262:170–177

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Della Valle CJ, Nunley RM, Raterman SJ, Barrack RL (2009) Initial American experience with hip resurfacing following FDA approval. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:72–78

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Edwards BN, Tullos HS, Noble PC (1987) Contributory factors and etiology of sciatic nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 218:136–141

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Gay DP, Desser DR, Parks BG, Boucher HR (2010) Sciatic nerve injury in total hip resurfacing: a biomechanical analysis. J Arthroplasty 25:1295–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hing CB, Back DL, Bailey M et al (2007) The results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing at a mean of five years. An independent prospective review of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89:1431–1438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hurd JL, Potter HG, Dua V, Ranawat CS (2006) Sciatic nerve palsy after primary total hip arthroplasty: a new perspective. J Arthroplasty 21:796–802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Johanson NA, Pellicci PM, Salvati EA (1983) Nerve injury in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 179:214–222

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McMinn DJW (2009) Patient positioning and exposure. In: McMinn DJW (ed) Modern hip resurfacing, Springer, London Limited, pp 189–223

  9. Navarro RA, Schmalzried TP, Amstutz HC, Dorey FJ (1995) Surgical approach and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 10:1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nercessian OA, Gonzalez EG, Stinchfield FE (1989) The use of somatosensory evoked potential during revision or reoperation for total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 243:138–142

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nercessian OA, Macaulay W, Stinchfield FE (1994) Peripheral neuropathies following total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 6:645–651

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pereles TR, Stuchin SA, Kastenbaum DM, Beric A, Lacagnino G, Kabir H (1996) Surgical maneuvers placing the sciatic nerve at risk during total hip arthroplasty as assessed by somato- sensory evoked potential monitoring. J Arthroplasty 11:438–444

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pokorny D, Jahoda D, Veigl D et al (2006) Topographic variations of the relationship of the sciatic nerve and the piriformis muscle and its relevance to palsy after total hip arthroplasty. Surg Radiol Anat 28:88–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Rydevik B, Lundborg G, Bogge U (1981) Effects of graded compression on intraneural blood flow. An in vivo study on rabbit tibial nerve. J Hand Surg Am 6:3–12

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Schmalzried TP, Amstutz HC, Dorey FJ (1991) Nerve palsy associated with total hip replacement. Risk factors and prognosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 73:1074–1080

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Schmalzried TP, Noordin S, Amstutz HC (1997) Update on nerve palsy associated with total hip replacement. Clin Orthop 344:188–206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Simon JP, Van Delm I, Fabry G (1993) Sciatic nerve palsy following hip surgery. Acta Orthop Belg 59:156–162

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Solheim LF, Hagen R (1980) Femoral and sciatic neuropathies after total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 51:531–534

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Stone RG, Weeks LE, Hajdu M, Stinchfield FE (1985) Evaluation of sciatic nerve compromise during total hip arthro-plasty. Clin Orthop 201:26–31

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Weber ER, Daube JR, Coventry MB (1976) Peripheral neuropathies associated with total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 58:66–69

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Wilson JN, Scales JT (1973) The Stanmore metal on metal total hip prosthesis using a three pin type cup. A follow-up of 100 arthroplasties over nine years. Clin Orthop 95:239–249

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Bozkurt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Isik, C., Apaydin, N., Acar, H.I. et al. The gluteal sling: an anatomical study. Surg Radiol Anat 36, 595–599 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1231-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1231-0

Keywords

Navigation