Abstract
Purpose
This paper aims to report and discuss a case in which unusual anatomical variations were observed in the mandibular canal (MC) and the mandibular incisive canal (MIC) in a same patient.
Materials and methods
A 49-year-old healthy female was referred for mandibular dental implant placement. Panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) were performed. Cross-sections, axial, coronal, panoramic reconstructions and volume rendering were obtained.
Results
The panoramic radiograph did not show any evidence of abnormality. CBCT showed a bifid MC on the right side. It extended to the buccal cortex, exteriorized for 6 mm and returned to its conventional trajectory to reach the mental foramen. On the left side, the MIC initially followed its normal trajectory for 4 mm but, in the canine region, it also extended to the buccal cortex and exteriorized.
Conclusion
The advent of CBCT in Dentistry allowed a greater accuracy in the diagnosis of anatomical variations in the jaws, preventing injury to the neurovascular bundle and enabling an adequate surgical planning in the region.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Al-Ani O, Nambiar P, Ha KO, Ngeow WC (2012) Safe zone for bone harvesting from the interforaminal region of the mandible. Clin Oral Implants Res. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02393.x
Apostolakis D, Brown JE (2013) The dimensions of the mandibular incisive canal and its spatial relationship to various anatomical landmarks of the mandible: a study using cone beam computed tomography. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:117–124
Curien R, Braun M, Perez M et al (2011) Discriminant study of the development of the mandibular units in a neural reference system. Surg Radiol Anat 33:191–196
Gowgiel JM (1992) The position and course of the mandibular canal. J Oral Implantol 18:383–385
Kim ST, Hu KS, Song WC, Kang MK, Park HD, Kim HJ (2009) Location of the mandibular canal and the topography of its neurovascular structures. J Craniofac Surg 20:936–939
Manikandhan R, Mathew PC, Naveenkumar J, Anantanarayanan P (2010) A rare variation in the course of the inferior alveolar nerve. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 39:185–187
Makris N, Stamatakis H, Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, van der Stelt PF (2010) Evaluation of the visibility and the course of the mandibular incisive canal and the lingual foramen using cone-beam computed tomography. Clin Oral Implant Res 21:766–771
Mizbah K, Gerlach N, Maal TJ, Bergé SJ, Meijer GJ (2012) The clinical relevance of bifid and trifid mandibular canals. J Article Oral Maxillofac Surg 16:147–151
Oliveira LK (2013) Fenestration of the mandibular buccal cortex by the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 42:544–546
Oliveira Junior MR, Saud AL, Fonseca DR et al (2011) Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal: a CT investigation. Surg Radiol Anat 33:345–352
Orhan K, Aksoy S, Bilecenoglu B et al (2011) Evaluation of bifid mandibular canals with cone-beam computed tomography in a Turkish adult population: a retrospective study. Surg Radiol Anat 33:501–507
Pires CA, Bissada NF, Becker JJ, Kanawati A, Landers MA (2012) Mandibular incisive canal: cone beam computed tomography. Clin Impl Dent Res 14:67–73
Politis C, Ramirez XB, Sun Y et al (2013) Visibility of mandibular canal on panoramic radiograph after bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO). Surg Radiol Anat 35:233–240
Tamás F (1987) Position of the mandibular canal. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 16:65–69
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Souza Tolentino, E., Silva, P.A.A., Pagin, O. et al. Uncommon trajectory variations of the mandibular canal and of the mandibular incisive canal: case report. Surg Radiol Anat 35, 857–861 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1138-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-013-1138-9