Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The lumbosacral plexus: anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The minimally invasive transpsoas approach can be employed to treat various spinal disorders, such as disc degeneration, deformity, and lateral disc herniation. With this technique, visualization is limited in comparison with the open procedure and the proximity of the lumbar plexus to the surgical pathway is one limitation of this technique. Precise knowledge of the regional anatomy of the lumbar plexus is required for safe passage through the psoas muscle. The primary objective of this study was to determine the anatomic position of the lumbar plexus branches and sympathetic chain in relation to the intervertebral disc and to define a safe working zone. The second objective was to compare our observations with previous anatomical studies concerning the transpsoas approach.

Methods

A total of 60 lumbar plexus in 8 fresh cadavers from the Department of Anatomy were analyzed in this study. Coronal and lateral X-Ray images were obtained before dissection in order to eliminate spine deformity or fracture. All cadavers were placed in a lateral decubitus position with a lateral bolster. Dissection of the lumbar plexus was performed. All nerve branches and sympathetic chain were identified. Intervertebral disc space from L1L2 to L4L5 was divided into four zones. Zone 1 being the anterior quarter of the disc, zone 2 being the middle anterior quarter, zone 3 the posterior middle quarter and zone 4 the posterior quarter. Crossing of each nervous branch with the disc was reported and a safe working zone was determined for L1L2 to L4L5 disc levels. A safe working zone was defined by the absence of crossing of a lumbar plexus branch.

Results

No anatomical variation was found during blunt dissection. As described previously, the lumbar plexus is composed of the ventral divisions of the first four lumbar nerves and from contributions of the sub costal nerve from T12. The safe working zone includes zones 2 and 3 at level L1L2, zone 3 at level L2L3, zone 3 at level L3L4, and zone 2 at level L4L5. No difference was observed between right and left sides as regards the relationships between the lumbar plexus and the intervertebral disc.

Conclusion

We observed some differences concerning the safe working zone in comparison with other cadaveric studies. The small number of cadaveric specimens used in anatomical studies probably explains theses differences. The minimally invasive transpsoas lateral approach was initially developed to reduce the complications associated with the traditional procedure. The anatomical relationships between the lumbar plexus and the intervertebral disc make this technique particularly risky a L4L5. Alternative techniques, such as transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) or anterior interbody fusion (ALIF) should be used at this level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anand N, Baron EM, Thaiyananthan G, Khalsa K, Goldstein TB (2008) Minimally invasive multilevel percutaneous correction and fusion for adult lumbar degenerative scoliosis: a technique and feasibility study. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:459–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Banagan K, Gelb D, Poelstra K, Ludwig S (2011) Anatomic mapping of lumbar nerve roots during a direct lateral transpsoas approach to the spine: a cadaveric study. Spine. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181ec5911

  3. Benglis DM, Vanni S, Levi AD (2009) An anatomical study of the lumbosacral plexus as related to the minimally invasive transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. J Neurosurg Spine 10:139–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bergey DL, Villavicencio AT, Goldstein T, Regan JJ (2004) Endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine. Spine 29:1681–1688

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dakwar E, Cardona RF, Smith DA, Uribe JS (2010) Early outcomes and safety of the minimally invasive, lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach for adult degenerative scoliosis. Neurosurg Focus 28:E8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dakwar E, Vale FL, Uribe JS (2011) Trajectory of the main sensory and motor branches of the lumbar plexus outside the psoas muscle related to the latéral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. J Neurosurg Spine 14:290–295

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fantini GA, Pappou IP, Girardi FP, Sandhu HS, Cammisa FP Jr (2007) Major vascular injury during anterior lumbar spinal surgery: incidence, risk factors, and management. Spine 32:2751–2758

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Gu Y, Ebraheim NA, Xu R, Rezcallah AT, Yeasting RA (2001) Anatomic considerations of the posterolateral lumbar disk region. Orthopedics 24:56–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Guérin P, Obeid I, Gille O, Bourghli A, Luc S, Pointillart V, Cursolle JC, Vital JM (2011) Safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: a morphometric study. Surg Radiol Anat. doi:10.1007/s00276-011-0798-6

  10. Hasegawa T, Mikawa Y, Watanabe R, An HS (1996) Morphometric analysis of the lumbosacral nerve roots and dorsal root ganglia by magnetic resonance imaging. Spine 21:1005–1009

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kepler CK, Bogner EA, Herzog RJ, Huang RC (2010) Anatomy of the psoas muscle and lumbar plexus with respect to the surgical approach for lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-010-1593-5

  12. Knight RQ, Schwaegler P, Hanscom D, Roh J (2009) Direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative conditions: early complication profile. J Spinal Disord Tech 22:34–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Matejcik V (2010) Anatomical variations of lumbosacral plexus. Surg Radiol Anat 32(4):409–414

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moro T, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Yaginuma H (2003) An anatomic study of the lumbar plexus with respect to retroperitoneal endoscopic surgery. Spine 28:423–428

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ozgur BM, Aryan HE, Pimenta L, Taylor WR (2006) Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF): a novel surgical technique for anterior lumbar interbody fusion. Spine J 6:435–443

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Park DK, Lee MJ, Lin EL, Singh K, An HS, Phillips FM (2010) The relationship of intrapsoas nerves during a transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine: anatomic study. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:223–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Regev GJ, Chen L, Dhawan M, Lee YP, Garfin SR, Kim CW (2009) Morphometric analysis of the ventral nerve roots and retroperitoneal vessels with respect to the minimally invasive lateral approach in normal and deformed spines. Spine 34:1330–1335

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Uribe JS, Arredondo N, Dakwar E, Vale FL (2010) Defining the safe working zones using the minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach: an anatomical study. J Neurosurg Spine 13:260–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Etienne Delamarre and technicians from Department of Anatomy.

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire d’Anatomie Médico-Chirurgicale Appliquée Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, 146 rue Léo Saignat, 33000, Bordeaux, France

    Patrick Guérin, Anouar Bourghli & Jean-Marc Vital

  2. Spinal Unit 1, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Place Amélie Raba-Léon, 33076, Bordeaux Cedex, France

    Patrick Guérin, Ibrahim Obeid, Anouar Bourghli, Thibault Masquefa, Stéphane Luc, Olivier Gille, Vincent Pointillart & Jean-Marc Vital

Authors
  1. Patrick Guérin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ibrahim Obeid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Anouar Bourghli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Thibault Masquefa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stéphane Luc
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Olivier Gille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Vincent Pointillart
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jean-Marc Vital
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Guérin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guérin, P., Obeid, I., Bourghli, A. et al. The lumbosacral plexus: anatomic considerations for minimally invasive retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. Surg Radiol Anat 34, 151–157 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0881-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0881-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation