Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The effect of skin entry site, needle angulation and soft tissue compression on simulated antegrade and retrograde femoral arterial punctures: an anatomical study using Cartesian co-ordinates derived from CT angiography

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Safe femoral arterial access is an important procedural step in many interventional procedures and variations of the anatomy of the region are well known. The aim of this study was to redefine the anatomy relevant to the femoral arterial puncture and simulate the results of different puncture techniques.

Methods

A total of 100 consecutive CT angiograms were used and regions of interest were labelled giving Cartesian co-ordinates which allowed determination of arterial puncture site relative to skin puncture site, the bifurcation and inguinal ligament (ING).

Results

The ING was lower than defined by bony landmarks by 16.6 mm. The femoral bifurcation was above the inferior aspect of the femoral head in 51% and entirely medial to the femoral head in 1%. Simulated antegrade and retrograde punctures with dogmatic technique, using a 45-degree angle would result in a significant rate of high and low arterial punctures. Simulated 50% soft tissue compression also resulted in decreased rate of high retrograde punctures but an increased rate of low antegrade punctures.

Conclusions

Use of dogmatic access techniques is predicted to result in an unacceptably high rate of dangerous high and low punctures. Puncture angle and geometry can be severely affected by patient obesity. The combination of fluoroscopy to identify entry point, ultrasound-guidance to identify the femoral bifurcation and soft tissue compression to improve puncture geometry are critical for safe femoral arterial access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ et al (2009) Fluoroscopy vs. traditional guided femoral arterial access and the use of closure devices: a randomized controlled trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 74:533–539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dotter CT, Rösch J, Robinson M (1978) Fluoroscopic guidance in femoral artery puncture. Radiology 127:266–267

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dudeck O, Teichgraeber U, Podrabsky P et al (2004) A randomized trial assessing the value of ultrasound-guided puncture of the femoral artery for interventional investigations. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 20:363–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fitts J, Ver LP, Hofmaster P et al (2008) Fluoroscopy-guided femoral artery puncture reduces the risk of PCI-related vascular complications. J Interv Cardiol 21:273–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gabriel M, Pawlaczyk K, Waliszewski K et al (2007) Location of femoral artery puncture site and the risk of postcatheterization pseudoaneurysm formation. Int J Cardiol 120:167–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Grier D, Hartnell G (1993) Percutaneous femoral artery puncture: practice and anatomy. Br J Radiol 63:602–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Huggins C, Gillespie MJ, Tan WA et al (2009) A prospective randomized clinical trial of the use of fluoroscopy in obtaining femoral arterial access. J Invasive Cardiol 21:105–109

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Irani F, Sachin K, Colyer WR (2009) Common femoral artery access techniques: a review. J Cardiovasc Med 10:517–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobi JA, Schussler JM, Johnson KB (2009) Routine femoral head fluoroscopy to reduce complications in coronary catheterization. Proc Bayl Univ Med Center 22:7–8

    Google Scholar 

  10. Johnson SJ, Healey AE, Evans JC et al (2005) Physical and cognitive task analysis in interventional radiology. Clin Radiol 61:97–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lechner G, Jantsch H, Waneck R et al (1998) The relationship between the common femoral artery, the inguinal crease, and the inguinal ligament: a guide to accurate angiographic puncture. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol 11:165–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Millward SF, Burbridge BE, Luna G (1993) Puncturing the pulseless femoral artery: a simple technique that uses palpation of anatomic landmarks. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:415–417

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rupp SB, Vogelzang RL, Nemcek AA et al (1990) Relationship of the inguinal ligament to pelvic radiographic landmarks: anatomic correlation and its role in femoral arteriography. J Vasc Interv Radiol 4:409–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Spector KS, Lawson WE (2001) Optimizing safe femoral access during cardiac catheterization. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 53:209–212

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew D. B. S. Tam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tam, M.D.B.S., Lewis, M. The effect of skin entry site, needle angulation and soft tissue compression on simulated antegrade and retrograde femoral arterial punctures: an anatomical study using Cartesian co-ordinates derived from CT angiography. Surg Radiol Anat 34, 751–755 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0880-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0880-0

Keywords

Navigation