Abstract
Purpose
To detect the presence of differences in transverse dimensions in the female iliac blades in comparison to normal population groups.
Methods
The present study measures the transverse dimensions of female iliac blades from cadavers and dried bone specimens from women in the age group 50–70 years and compares with similar measurements taken from adult male dried hip bones. Five transverse dimensions were recorded in each iliac bone at equidistant positions twice. Once, the dimensions were measured along the upper segment and then along the lower segment of the bone. Both segments corresponded approximately to the directions of placement of screws in the two bolt iliac foundation. Hemi-pelvises from cadavers were sectioned vertically at equidistant planes and the sections were directly measured for the thickness at the cut surfaces in the two segments along the probable route of screw placement.
Results
The lower segments were thicker and bulkier along the greater part of their length than the upper ones. The differences of dimensions between the two sides from the same individual and between the two groups were negligible and statistically insignificant. Thickness at the dorsal aspect of the hip-bone (ilium) in elderly females was comparable to male ones.
Conclusion
Measurements along the path of screw placements for a two bolt pelvic foundation in elderly females were found to be comparable with dimensions observed in the other samples used in the study.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Asher MA, Strippgen WE (1986) Anthropometric studies of the human sacrum relating to dorsal trans-sacral implant designs. Clin Orthop 203:58–62
Asher MA (1996) Lumbopelvic fixation with the Isola spinal implant system. In: Margulies JY, Floman Y, Farcy JPC et al (eds) Lumbosacral and spinopelvic fixation. Lippincott-Raven Press, New York
Berry JL, Stahurski T, Asher MA (2001) Morphometry of the supra sciatic notch intra iliac implant anchor passage. Spine 26(7):E143–E148
Emami A, Deviren V, Berven S et al (2002) Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity “Luque-Galveston”, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation. Spine 27:776–786
Ferguson RL (1994) Rod instrumentation. In: Weinstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine: principles and practice. Raven Press, New York, pp 1676–1677
Jackson RP, McManus AC (1993) The iliac buttress. A computed tomographic study of sacral anatomy. Spine 18:1318–1328
Margulies JY, Armour EF, Kohler-Ekstand C et al (1999) Revision of fusion from the spine to the sacropelvis: considerations. In: Margulies JY, Aebi M, Farcy JPC (eds) Revision spine surgery. St. Louis, Mosby, pp 623–630
Margulies JY, Shaffer WO (2004) Spinopelvic fixation. In: Herkowitz HN, Dvorak J, Gordon RB, Nordin M, Grob D (eds) The lumbar spine. LWW, Philadelphia, pp 636–646
Misenhimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SLG, Widell EH (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 11:367–372
Schwend RM, Sluyters R, Najdzionek J (2003) The pylon concept of pelvic anchorage for spinal instrumentation in the human cadaver. Spine 28(6):542–547
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Douglas K, Yeasting RA (1996) The projection of the lateral sacral mass on the outer table of the posterior ilium. Spine 21(7):790–795
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Gove NK (2008) Surgical anatomy of the sacrum. Am J Orthop 37(10):E1–E177
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Robke J, Yeasting RA (1996) Radiologic evaluation of iliosacral screw placement. Spine 21(5):582–588
Zindrick MR (1994) Pedicle screw fixation. In: Weilstein SL (ed) The pediatric spine: principles and practice.Raven Press, New York, p 1698
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest is associated with the study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mahato, N.K. Dorsal iliac dimensions in elderly females: anatomical considerations in two bolt iliac foundation construct. Surg Radiol Anat 34, 145–149 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0879-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0879-6