Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Computer aided three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of the pelvis, by using plastinated cross sections, as a powerful tool for morphological investigations

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to describe a method of developing a computerized model of the human female pelvis using plastinated slices. Computerized reconstruction of anatomical structures is becoming very useful for developing anatomical teaching, research modules and animations. Although databases consisting of serial sections derived from frozen cadaver material exist, plastination represents an alternative method for developing anatomical data useful for computerized reconstruction.

Methods

A slice anatomy study, using plastinated transparent pelvis cross sections, was performed to obtain a 3D reconstruction. One female human pelvis used for this study, first plastinated as a block, then sliced into thin slices and in the end subjected to 3D computerized reconstruction using WinSURF modeling system (SURFdriver Software). To facilitate the understanding of the complex pelvic floor anatomy on sectional images obtained through MR imaging, and to make the representation more vivid, a female pelvis computer-aided 3D model was created.

Results

Qualitative observations revealed that the morphological features of the model were consistent with those displayed by typical cadaveric specimens. The quality of the reconstructed images appeared distinct, especially the spatial positions and complicated relationships of contiguous structures of the female pelvis. All reconstructed structures can be displayed in groups or as a whole and interactively rotated in 3D space.

Conclusions

The utilization of plastinates for generating tissue sections is useful for 3D computerized modeling. The 3D model of the female pelvis presented in this paper provides a stereoscopic view to study the adjacent relationship and arrangement of respective pelvis sections. A better understanding of the pelvic floor anatomy is relevant to gynaecologists, radiologists, surgeons, urologists, physical therapists and all professionals who take care of women with pelvic floor dysfunction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An PC, Zhang M (1999) A technique for preserving the subarachnoid space and its contents in a natural state with different colours. J Int Soc Plastination 14:12–17

    Google Scholar 

  2. Contouris N (1988) The human levator ani muscle. Advances in andrology. Carl Schirren Symposium. Diesbach Verlag, Berlin, pp 159–165

    Google Scholar 

  3. de Barros N, Junqueira Rodrigues C, Junqueira Rodrigues A Jr, de Negri Germano MA, Guido Cerri G (2001) The value of teaching sectional anatomy to improve CT scan interpretation. Clin Anat 14:36–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. de Leval J (2003) Novel surgical technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence: transobturator vaginal tape inside-out. Eur Urol 44:724–730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dev P, Montgomery K, Senger S, Heinrichs WL, Srivastava S, Waldron K (2002) Simulated medical learning environments on the internet. J Amer Med Informatics Assoc 9:437–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dietz HP (2011) Pelvic floor ultrasound in incontinence: what’s in it for the surgeon? Int Urogynecol J. doi:10.1007/s00192-011-1402-7

  7. Fritsch H, Lienemann A, Brenner E, Ludwikowski B (2004) Clinical anatomy of the pelvic floor. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 175(III-IX):1–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fritsch H, Hötzinger H (1995) Tomographical anatomy of the pelvis, visceral pelvic connective tissue, and its compartments. Clin Anat 8:17–24

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Fröhlich B, Hötzinger H, Fritsch H (1997) Tomographical anatomy of the pelvis, pelvic floor, and related structures. Clin Anat 10:223–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Goodrich MA, Webb MJ, King BF, Bampton AE, Campeau NG, Riederer SJ (1993) Magnetic resonance imaging of pelvic floor relaxation: dynamic analysis and evaluation of patients before and after surgical repair. Gynecol Obstet 82:883–891

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gould D (2001) The brachial plexus: developmental and assessment of a computer based learning tool. Med Educ Online 6:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  12. Johnson G, Zhang M, Barnett R (2000) A comparison between epoxy resin slices and histology sections in the study of spinal connective tissue structure. J Int Soc Plastination 15:10–13

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lane A (1990) Sectional anatomy: standardized methodology. J Int Soc Plastination 4:16–22

    Google Scholar 

  14. Larson KA, Yousuf A, Lewicky-Gaupp C, Fenner DE, DeLancey JO (2010) Perineal body anatomy in living women: 3-dimensional analysis using thin-slice magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 21(494):e15–e21

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lien KC, Mooney B, DeLancey JO, Ashton-Miller JA (2004) Levator ani muscle stretch induced by simulated vaginal birth. Obstet Gynecol 103:31–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lienemann A, Anthuber C, Baron A, Kohz P, Reiser M (1997) Dynamic MR colpocystorectography assessing pelvic-floor descent. Eur Radiol 7:1309–1317

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lozanoff S, Lozanoff BK, Sora MC, Rosenheimer J, Keep MF, Tregear J, Saland L, Jacobs J, Saiki S, Alverson D (2003) Anatomy and the access grid: exploiting plastinated brain sections for use in distributed medical education. Anat Rec B New Anat 270:30–37

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mant J, Painter R, Vessey M (1997) Epidemiology of genital prolapse: observations from the Oxford Family Planning Association Study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 104:579–585

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller JM, Brandon C, Jacobson JA, Low LK, Zielinski R, Ashton-Miller J, Delancey JO (2010) MRI findings in patients considered high risk for pelvic floor injury studied serially after vaginal childbirth. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:786–791

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Moody D, Lozanoff S (1998) SURFdriver a practical computer program for generating three-dimensional models of anatomical structures using a PowerMac. Clin Anat 11:133

    Google Scholar 

  21. Neider GL, Scott JN, Anderson MD (2000) Using quicktime virtual reality objects in computer-assisted instruction of gross anatomy: yorick the VR skull. Clin Anat 13:287–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qiu MG, Zhang SX, Liu ZJ, Tan LW, Wang YS, Deng JH, Tang ZS (2003) Plastination and computerized 3D reconstruction of the temporal bone. Clin Anat 16:300–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sha Y, Zhang SX, Liu ZJ, Tan LW, Wu XY, Wan YS, Deng JH, Tang ZS (2001) Computerized 3D-reconstructions of the ligaments of the lateral aspect of ankle and subtalar joints. Surg Radiol Anat 23:111–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sora MC, Strobl B, Forster-Streffleur S, Staykov D (2002) Optic nerve compression analyzed by using plastination. Surg Radiol Anat 24:205–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sora MC (2007) Epoxy plastination of biological tissue: E12 ultra-thin technique. J Int Soc Plastination 22:40–45

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sora MC, Genser-Strobl B, Radu J, Lozanoff S (2007) Three-dimensional reconstruction of the ankle by means of ultrathin slice plastination. Clin Anat 20:196–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Standring S (2008) Muscles of the pelvis. In: Gray’s anatomy, 40th edn. Churchill-Livingstone, London, p 1083

  28. von Hagens G (1977) Patents: DBP at 27 10 147 (1978) Brit Pat 1 558 802 (1984) Brit Pat 22 082 041 (1978) Belg Pat 863.949 (1978) RSA Pat 78/1330 (1980) Austr. Pat 360 272 (1980) US Pat 4, 205.059 (1981) US Pat 4, 244, 992 (1981) US Pat 4, 278, 701 (1982) US-Pat 4, 320, 157

  29. Thomas M, Steinke H, Schulz T (2004) A direct comparison of MR images and thin-layer plastination of the shoulder in the apprehension-test position. Surg Radiol Anat 26(2):110–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Trelease RB (2002) Anatomical informatics: millenial perspectives on a newer frontier. Anat Rec 269:224–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Woodfield CA, Krishnamoorthy S, Hampton BS, Brody JM (2010) Imaging pelvic floor disorders: trend toward comprehensive MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 194:1640–1649

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mircea-Constantin Sora.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sora, MC., Jilavu, R. & Matusz, P. Computer aided three-dimensional reconstruction and modeling of the pelvis, by using plastinated cross sections, as a powerful tool for morphological investigations. Surg Radiol Anat 34, 731–736 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0862-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-011-0862-2

Keywords

Navigation