Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 397–404 | Cite as

Female pelvic autonomic neuroanatomy based on conventional macroscopic and computer-assisted anatomic dissections

  • David Moszkowicz
  • Bayan Alsaid
  • Thomas Bessede
  • Christophe Penna
  • Gérard Benoit
  • Frédérique Peschaud
Original Article

Abstract

Purpose

To confront nerve dissection, tissue staining, nerve immunolabelling and Computer-Assisted Anatomic Dissection (CAAD) in identifying the precise location and origin of intrapelvic autonomic nerve fibers and to provide a three-dimensional (3D) representation of their relationship to other anatomical structures.

Methods

Serial transverse sections of the pelvic portion of five human female fetuses (18–31 weeks of gestation) were studied histologically (with hematoxylin/eosin and Masson trichrome) and immunohistochemically (anti-protein S100 antibody) digitized and reconstructed three-dimensionally with Surf driver software for Windows (Winsurf 4.3). Three fresh female adult cadavers were macroscopically dissected to individualize the inferior hypogastric plexus afferences and efferences and their anatomical relationships.

Results

This combined investigation including the CAAD technique allowed identifying the precise location and distribution of the pelvic nerve elements and their relationships to female pelvic organs. Hypogastric nerves (HN) were located in the retrorectal multilaminar structure and joined the homolateral inferior hypogastric plexus (IHP) at the lateral border of the recto-uterine pouch. The intersection of the ureter with the posterior wall of the uterine artery precisely located the junction of HN and IHP. Antero-inferior branches supplying female sexual and continence organs originated from the antero-inferior angle of IHP and were bundled at the posterolateral vaginal wall.

Conclusions

CAAD is an encouraging anatomical method for the development of anatomical and surgical research and teaching. Complementary to traditional anatomical studies, it may provide useful anatomical data for the comprehension of postoperative sexual and urinary dysfunction and the development of nerve-sparing surgical techniques.

Keywords

Anatomy Computer-assisted anatomic dissection Hypogastric nerve Inferior hypogastric plexus Nerve-sparing surgery Three-dimensional reconstruction 

References

  1. 1.
    Aigner F, Zbar AP, Ludwikowski B, Kreczy A, Kovacs P, Fritsch H (2004) The rectogenital septum: morphology, function, and clinical relevance. Dis Colon Rectum 47:131–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alsaid B, Bessede T, Karam I et al (2009) Coexistence of adrenergic and cholinergic nerves in the inferior hypogastric plexus: anatomical and immunohistochemical study with 3D reconstruction in human male fetus. J Anat 214:645–654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alsaid B, Karam I, Bessede T et al (2010) Tridimensional computer-assisted anatomic dissection of posterolateral prostatic neurovascular bundles. Eur Urol 58:281–287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arango-Toro O, Domenech-Mateu JM (1993) Development of the pelvic plexus in human embryos and fetuses and its relationship with the pelvic viscera. Eur J Morphol 31:193–208PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baader B, Herrmann M (2003) Topography of the pelvic autonomic nervous system and its potential impact on surgical intervention in the pelvis. Clin Anat 16:119–130PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Benoit G, Cailleaux F, Quillard J et al (1991) Computer assisted anatomical reconstruction: a prostate model. Surg Radiol Anat 13:45–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Benoit G, Droupy S, Quillard J, Paradis V, Giuliano F (1999) Supra and infralevator neurovascular pathways to the penile corpora cavernosa. J Anat 195(Pt 4):605–615PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bisset IP, Chau KY, Hill GL (2000) Extrafascial excision of the rectum: surgical anatomy of the fascia propria. Dis Colon Rectum 43:903–910PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Butler-Manuel SA, Buttery LD, A’Hern RP, Polak JM, Barton DP (2000) Pelvic nerve plexus trauma at radical hysterectomy and simple hysterectomy: the nerve content of the uterine supporting ligaments. Cancer 89:834–841PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duan S, He H, Lv S, Chen L (2010) Three-dimensional CT study on the anatomy of vertebral artery at atlantoaxial and intracranial segment. Surg Radiol Anat 32:39–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Fiala JC (2005) Reconstruct: a free editor for serial section microscopy. J Microsc 218:52–61PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fritsch H (1989) Topography of the pelvic autonomic nerves in human fetuses between 21 and 29 weeks of gestation. Anat Embryol (Berl) 180:57–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Havenga K, De Ruiter MC, Enker WE, Welvaart K (1996) Anatomical basis of autonomic nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 83:384–388PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hern WM (1984) Correlation of fetal age and measurements between 10 and 26 weeks of gestation. Obstet Gynecol 63:26–32PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hollabaugh RS Jr, Dmochowski RR, Steiner MS (1997) Neuroanatomy of the male rhabdosphincter. Urology 49:426–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hounnou GM, Uhl JF, Plaisant O, Delmas V (2003) Morphometry by computerized three-dimensional reconstruction of the hypogastric plexus of a human fetus. Surg Radiol Anat 25:21–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kalfa N, Liu B, Cao M, Vilella M, Hsieh M, Baskin LS (2008) 3-dimensional neuroanatomy of the human fetal pelvis: anatomical support for partial urogenital mobilization in the treatment of urogenital sinus. J Urol 180:1709–1714 discussion 1714–5PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Karam I, Droupy S, Abd-Alsamad I et al (2005) The precise location and nature of the nerves to the male human urethra: histological and immunohistochemical studies with three-dimensional reconstruction. Eur Urol 48:858–864PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Marks SC Jr (2000) The role of three-dimensional information in health care and medical education: the implications for anatomy and dissection. Clin Anat 13:448–452PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mauroy B, Bizet B, Bonnal JL, Crombet T, Duburcq T, Hurt C (2007) Systematization of the vesical and uterovaginal efferences of the female inferior hypogastric plexus (pelvic): applications to pelvic surgery on women patients. Surg Radiol Anat 29:209–217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Mauroy B, Demondion X, Bizet B, Claret A, Mestdagh P, Hurt C (2007) The female inferior hypogastric (=pelvic) plexus: anatomical and radiological description of the plexus and its afferences–applications to pelvic surgery. Surg Radiol Anat 29:55–66PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Moszkowicz D, Alsaid B, Bessede T et al. (2010) Where does pelvic nerve injury occur during rectal surgery for cancer? Colorectal Dis August [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Paraskevas G, Tsitsopoulos P, Papaziogas B et al (2008) Variability in superior hypogastric plexus morphology and its clinical applications: a cadaveric study. Surg Radiol Anat 30:481–488PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ramanah R, Parratte B, Arbez-Gindre F, Maillet R, Riethmuller D (2008) The uterosacral complex: ligament or neurovascular pathway? Anatomical and histological study of fetuses and adults. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 19:1565–1570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Uhl JF, Plaisant O, Ami O, Delmas V (2006) 3D modeling in the field of morphology: methods, interest and results. Morphologie 90:5–20PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yucel S, De Souza A Jr, Baskin LS (2004) Neuroanatomy of the human female lower urogenital tract. J Urol 172:191–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhang SX, Heng PA, Liu ZJ et al (2004) The Chinese Visible Human (CVH) datasets incorporate technical and imaging advances on earlier digital humans. J Anat 204:165–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Moszkowicz
    • 1
    • 2
  • Bayan Alsaid
    • 1
  • Thomas Bessede
    • 1
  • Christophe Penna
    • 2
    • 3
  • Gérard Benoit
    • 1
  • Frédérique Peschaud
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Laboratory of Experimental Surgery, EA 4122, Faculty of MedicineBicêtre-Paris 11 UniversityLe Kremlin-BicêtreFrance
  2. 2.Department of Surgery, Assistance-Publique-Hôpitaux de ParisAmbroise Paré HospitalBoulogneFrance
  3. 3.University PIFO UVSQGuyancourtFrance
  4. 4.Service de Chirurgie Digestive, Hôpital Ambroise ParéBoulogneFrance

Personalised recommendations