Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal: a CT investigation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to clarify the correct localization of the mandibular canal (MC) that is essential in order to avoid injuries to the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle during oral surgical procedures.

Methods

We have analyzed the position of the MC using computed tomography data bank examinations of the oral region from 50 partially dentulous Brazilian patients aging from 25 to 75 years old (mean ± SD values = 51.70 ± 4.50; females = 27; males = 23) that were obtained with the purpose of dental restoration and without any gross pathology of the mandible. Axial images were 1-mm-thick slices using bone regular algorithm, without intravenous contrast.

Results

We have measured (mean ± SD) the orthogonal distances between the MC and the following selected regions of the mandible: (a) the buccal cortical plate (6.10 ± 1.52 mm); (b) the inferior border of the mandible (10.55 ± 2.28 mm); (c) the lingual cortical plate (3.98 ± 1.14 mm); and (d) the superior border of the alveolar process (16.98 ± 2.85 mm).

Conclusions

Our morphometric findings may help clarifying the detailed anatomy of the MC and its topographical relations for the planning of dental implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bassi F, Procchio M, Fava C et al (1999) Bone density in human dentate and edentulous mandibles using computed tomography. Clin Oral Implants Res 10:356–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bodard AG, Bemer J, Gourmet R et al (2008) Dental implants and microvascular free fibula flap: 23 patients. Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 109:363–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boeddinghaus R, Whyte A (2008) Current concepts in maxillofacial imaging. Eur J Radiol 66:396–418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Dal Pont G (1961) Retromolar osteotomy for the correction of prognathism. J Oral Surg 19:42–47

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dutra V, Devlin H, Susin C et al (2006) Mandibular morphological changes in low bone mass edentulous females: evaluation of panoramic radiographs. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 102:663–668

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Felice P, Cannizzaro G, Checchi V et al (2009) Vertical bone augmentation versus 7-mm-long implants in posterior atrophic mandibles. Results of a randomised controlled clinical trial of up to 4 months after loading. Eur J Oral Implantol 2:7–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Friedland B, Donoff B, Dodson TB (2008) The use of 3-dimensional reconstructions to evaluate the anatomic relationship of the mandibular canal and impacted mandibular third molars. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 66:1678–1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Guler AU, Sumer M, Sumer P et al (2005) The evaluation of vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones and the location of anatomic landmarks in panoramic radiographs of edentulous patients for implant dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 32:741–746

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hanazawa T, Sano T, Seki K et al (2004) Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:226–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hwang K, Lee WJ, Song YB et al (2005) Vulnerability of the inferior alveolar nerve and mental nerve during genioplasty: an anatomic study. J Craniofac Surg 16:10–14 (discussion 14)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ikeda K, Ho KC, Nowicki BH et al (1996) Multiplanar MR and anatomic study of the mandibular canal. Am J Neuroradiol 17:579–584

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jhamb A, Dolas RS, Pandilwar PK et al (2009) Comparative efficacy of spiral computed tomography and orthopantomography in preoperative detection of relation of inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle to the impacted mandibular third molar. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 67:58–66

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamburoglu K, Kilic C, Ozen T et al (2009) Measurements of mandibular canal region obtained by cone-beam computed tomography: a cadaveric study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 107:e34–e42

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kilic C, Kamburoglu K, Ozen T et al (2010) The position of the mandibular canal and histologic feature of the inferior alveolar nerve. Clin Anat 23:34–42

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kriwalsky MS, Maurer P, Veras RB et al (2008) Risk factors for a bad split during sagittal split osteotomy. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 46:177–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Levine MH, Goddard AL, Dodson TB (2007) Inferior alveolar nerve canal position: a clinical and radiographic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:470–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Loubele M, Van Assche N, Carpentier K et al (2008) Comparative localized linear accuracy of small-field cone-beam CT and multislice CT for alveolar bone measurements. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 105:512–518

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mavili ME, Canter HI, Saglam-Aydinatay B (2009) Semirigid fixation of mandible and maxilla in orthognathic surgery: stability and advantages. Ann Plast Surg 63:396–403

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Merrot O, Vacher C, Merrot S et al (2005) Changes in the edentate mandible in the elderly. Surg Radiol Anat 27:265–270

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Moriyama H, Shimada K, Itoh M et al (2007) Morphometric analysis of the inferior alveolar nerve fails to demonstrate sexual dimorphism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 65:1555–1561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Naitoh M, Nakahara K, Suenaga Y et al (2010) Comparison between cone-beam and multislice computed tomography depicting mandibular neurovascular canal structures. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:e25–e31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Park W, Choi JW, Kim JY et al (2010) Cortical integrity of the inferior alveolar canal as a predictor of paresthesia after third-molar extraction. J Am Dent Assoc 141:271–278

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Polland KE, Munro S, Reford G et al (2001) The mandibular canal of the edentulous jaw. Clin Anat 14:445–452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Saglam AA (2002) The vertical heights of maxillary and mandibular bones in panoramic radiographs of dentate and edentulous subjects. Quintessence Int 33:433–438

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sethi A (1993) Precise site location for implants using CT scans: a technical note. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 8:433–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Suomalainen A, Venta I, Mattila M et al (2010) Reliability of CBCT and other radiographic methods in preoperative evaluation of lower third molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 109:276–284

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Trauner R, Obwegeser HL (1957) The surgical correction of mandibular prognathism and retrognathia with consideration of genioplasty. Part I. Surgical procedures to correct mandibular prognathism and reshaping of the chin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 10:677–689

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ulm C, Tepper G, Blahout R et al (2009) Characteristic features of trabecular bone in edentulous mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:594–600

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe H, Mohammad Abdul M, Kurabayashi T et al (2010) Mandible size and morphology determined with CT on a premise of dental implant operation. Surg Radiol Anat 32:343–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yu IH, Wong YK (2008) Evaluation of mandibular anatomy related to sagittal split ramus osteotomy using 3-dimensional computed tomography scan images. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 37:521–528

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to Dr. Heraldo Belmont (3D Diagnose Lab) for the 3D CT procedures. We are grateful to Alexandra Ferreira dos Santos, Antonia Lima Carvalho and Tania Regina Pontes Cordeiro for their help during the organization of this investigation. This research was partly supported by grants from FAPERJ.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ricardo de Ary-Pires.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de Oliveira Júnior, M.R., Saud, A.L.S., Fonseca, D.R. et al. Morphometrical analysis of the human mandibular canal: a CT investigation. Surg Radiol Anat 33, 345–352 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0708-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0708-3

Keywords

Navigation