Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Predicted cervical canal enlargement and effective cord decompression following expansive laminoplasty using cervical magnetic resonance imaging

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Posterior translation of the spinal cord occurs passively following laminoplasty with the presence lordotic spine and availability of a space for the spinal cord to shift. This study is to predict the distance of posterior spinal cord migration after expansive laminoplasty at different cervical levels based on measurement of posterior translation of the spinal cord in normal cervical morphometry.

Methods

Measurements were performed from C34, C45, C56 and C67 disc using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images. Apical level of the cervical curve, lordotic angle, spinal cord diameter, spinal canal diameter, space anterior to the cord and spinal canal/cord ratio were determined before and after postulated laminoplasty. Statistical analysis was performed to assess the significance of the canal enlargement and effective spinal cord decompression at each level.

Results

The predicted spinal canal decompression achieved at C34, C4C5, C56 and C67 levels were 48.8, 71.9, 84 and 86.5%, respectively. The mean measurement of spinal canal after laminoplasty was 16.7 mm with spinal canal diameter increased between 3.5 and 5.6 mm. Space anterior to the cord after laminoplasty increased to between 8.6 and 10.9 mm. There was significant correlation between Cobb’s angle and spinal canal diameter post laminoplasty at C45, C56 and C67 but no significant correlation between Cobb’s angle and space anterior to the cord post laminoplasty was found.

Conclusions

Laminoplasty may produce larger canal expansion at the lower cervical spine compared to the upper cervical area; therefore, the outcomes of those who have predominantly higher cervical myelopathy were inferior to those who have lower cervical myelopathy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aita I, Hayashi K, Wadano Y, Yabuki T (1998) Posterior movement and enlargement of the spinal cord after cervical laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:33–37

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Baba H, Uchida K, Maezawa Y, Furusawa N, Azuchi M, Imura S (1996) Lordotic alignment and posterior migration of the spinal cord following en bloc open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy: a magnetic resonance imaging study. J Neurol 243:626–632

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Fujimura Y, Nishi Y, Chiba K, Nakamura M, Hirabayashi K (1998) Multiple regression analysis of the factors influencing the results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 117:471–474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fujiyoshi T, Yamazaki M, Kawabe J, Endo T, Furuya T, Koda M, Okawa A, Takahashi K, Konishi H (2008) A new concept for making decisions regarding the surgical approach for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: the K-line. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33:E990–E993

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hirabayashi K, Toyama Y, Chiba K (1999) Expansive laminoplasty for myelopathy in ossification of the longitudinal ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 359:35–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Houten JK, Cooper PR (2003) Laminectomy and posterior cervical plating for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy and ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: effects on cervical alignment, spinal cord compression, and neurological outcome. Neurosurgery 52:1081–1087 (discussion 1087–1088)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 1: Clinical results and limitations of laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:647–653

    Google Scholar 

  8. Iwasaki M, Okuda S, Miyauchi A, Sakaura H, Mukai Y, Yonenobu K, Yoshikawa H (2007) Surgical strategy for cervical myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: Part 2: Advantages of anterior decompression and fusion over laminoplasty. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:654–660

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kimura I, Shingu H, Nasu Y (1995) Long-term follow-up of cervical spondylotic myelopathy treated by canal-expansive laminoplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:956–961

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Mihara H, Kondo S, Takeguchi H, Kohno M, Hachiya M (2007) Spinal cord morphology and dynamics during cervical laminoplasty: evaluation with intraoperative sonography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2306–2309

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ohnari H, Sasai K, Akagi S, Iida H, Takanori S, Kato I (2006) Investigation of axial symptoms after cervical laminoplasty, using questionnaire survey. Spine J 6:221–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ratliff JK, Cooper PR (2003) Cervical laminoplasty: a critical review. J Neurosurg 98:230–238

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Ishii T, Yoshikawa H (2003) C5 palsy after decompression surgery for cervical myelopathy: review of the literature. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:2447–2451

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sakaura H, Hosono N, Mukai Y, Oshima K, Iwasaki M, Yoshikawa H (2008) Preservation of the nuchal ligament plays an important role in preventing unfavorable radiologic changes after laminoplasty. J Spinal Disord Tech 21:338–343

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Satomi K, Nishu Y, Kohno T, Hirabayashi K (1994) Long-term follow-up studies of open-door expansive laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19:507–510

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sodeyama T, Goto S, Mochizuki M, Takahashi J, Moriya H (1999) Effect of decompression enlargement laminoplasty for posterior shifting of the spinal cord. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:1527–1531 (discussion 1531–1532)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Suda K, Abumi K, Ito M, Shono Y, Kaneda K, Fujiya M (2003) Local kyphosis reduces surgical outcomes of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28:1258–1262

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tanaka J, Seki N, Tokimura F, Doi K, Inoue S (1999) Operative results of canal-expansive laminoplasty for cervical spondylotic myelopathy in elderly patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:2308–2312

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wada E, Yonenobu K, Suzuki S, Kanazawa A, Ochi T (1999) Can intramedullary signal change on magnetic resonance imaging predict surgical outcome in cervical spondylotic myelopathy? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:455–461 (discussion 462)

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang XY, Dai LY, Xu HZ, Chi YL (2006) Prediction of spinal canal expansion following cervical laminoplasty: a computer-simulated comparison between single and double-door techniques. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:2863–2870

    Google Scholar 

  21. White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM (1988) Biomechanical considerations in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:856–860

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yamazaki A, Homma T, Uchiyama S, Katsumi Y, Okumura H (1999) Morphologic limitations of posterior decompression by midsagittal splitting method for myelopathy caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament in the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24:32–34

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohd Imran Yusof.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yusof, M.I., Hassan, E. & Abdullah, S. Predicted cervical canal enlargement and effective cord decompression following expansive laminoplasty using cervical magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 33, 109–115 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0704-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-010-0704-7

Keywords

Navigation