Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reliability of Tuffier’s line evaluated on cadaver specimens

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim was to evaluate the reliability of Tuffier’s line usually used as sole method to identify lumbar spinous process for a correct needle placement. Fifty-eight cadaver specimens were placed in a lateral position and a flexion in the lumbar spine performed to achieve a neutralization of the lumbar lordosis. The iliac crests were palpated and the lumbar spinous process marked on the intercristal line with a pin; all specimens were dissected and the marked spinous process documented. The center of the L4 spinous process was hit in 24 male (41.38%) and 10 female (17.24%) specimens. In only two female specimens (3.45%), the upper vertebra was reached; a pin placed in L3 was not found in male cadavers. The inferior edge of the L4 spinous process was hit in male 4 times (6.90%) and in female cadavers 12 times (20.69%). In the fifth lumbar spinous process, pins were placed five times in female cadavers (8.62%) and in only one male cadaveric specimen (3.72%). In conclusion, the accuracy of the focused lumbar spinous process depends on the right bedding and the orientation of the given landmarks, so Tuffier’s line stays the most important tool for anesthetists if palpation is performed very precisely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Broadbent CR, Maxwell WB, Ferrie R, Wilson DJ, Gawne-Cain M, Russell R (2000) Ability of anaesthetists to identify a marked lumbar interspace. Anaesthesia 55:1122–1126

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chakraverty R, Pynsent P, Isaacs K (2007) Which spinal levels are identified by palpation of the iliac crests and the posterior superior iliac spines? J Anat 210:232–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellis H, Feldman S (1977) Anatomy for anaesthetists, 3rd edn. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, pp 122–124

    Google Scholar 

  4. Furness G, Reilly MP, Kuchi S (2002) An evaluation of ultrasound imaging for identification of lumbar intervertebral level. Anaesthesia 57:277–280

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gordh T (1979) Spinal anaesthesia. In: Eriksson E (ed) Illustrated handbook in local anaesthesia. Llyod-Luke, London, pp 116–124

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hollinshead H (1964) Anatomy for surgeons, Vol .3, back and limbs. Holber Medical Division, Harper & Row, New York, pp 120–122

  7. Jacoby GW (1895) Lumbar puncture of the subarachnoid space. N Y Med J 62:813–818

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kettani A, Tachinante R, Tazi A (2006) Evaluation of the iliac crest as anatomic landmark for spinal anaesthesia in pregnant women. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 25:501–504

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim JT, Bahk JH, Sung J (2003) Influence of age and sex on the position of the conus medullaris and Tuffier’s line in adults. Anesthesiology 99:1359–1363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. MacGibbon B, Farfan HF (1979) A radiologic survey of various configurations of the lumbar spine. Spine 4:258–266

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Render CA (1996) The reproducibility of the iliac crest as a marker of lumbar spine level. Anaesthesia 51:1070–1071

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shiraishi N, Matsumura G (2006) Establishing intercrestal line by posture: a radiographic evaluation. Okajimas Folia Anat Jpn 82(4):139–146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Santiago FR, Milena GL, Herrera RO, Romero PA, Plazas PG (2001) Morphometry of the lower lumbar vertebrae in patients with and without low back pain. Eur Spine J 10:228–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Snell R, Katz J (1988) Clinical anatomy for anaesthesiologists, 1st edn. Appleton, Norwalk, pp 134–135

    Google Scholar 

  15. Snider KT, Kribs JW, Snider EJ, Degenhardt BF, Bukowski A, Johnson JC (2008) Reliability of Tuffier’s line as an anatomic landmark. Spine 33:161–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thiel W (1992) The preservation of the whole corpse with natural color. Ann Anat 174:185–195

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tuffier T (1900) Anesthésie médullaire chirurgicale par injection sous-arachnoidienne lombaire de cocaïne, technique et résultats. Sem Medicale 20:167–169

    Google Scholar 

  18. Van Gessel EF, Forster A, Gamulin Z (1993) Continuous spinal anesthesia: where do spinal catheters go? Anesth Analg 76:1004–1007

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Williams PL (1999) Gray’s anatomy, 38th edn. Churchill Livingstone, London, pp 526–528

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunther Windisch.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Windisch, G., Ulz, H. & Feigl, G. Reliability of Tuffier’s line evaluated on cadaver specimens. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 627–630 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0493-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-009-0493-z

Keywords

Navigation