Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of vascular anatomy in living renal donors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Currently, multidetector computed tomographic (MDCT) angiography has become a noninvasive alternative imaging modality to catheter renal angiography for the evaluation of renal vascular anatomy in living renal donors. In this study, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of 16-slice MDCT in the preoperative assessment of living renal donors.

Methods

Fifty-nine consecutive living renal donors (32 men, 27 women) underwent MDCT angiography followed by open donor nephrectomy. All MDCT studies were performed by using a 16-slice MDCT scanner with the same protocol consisting of arterial and nephrographic phases followed by conventional abdominal radiography. The MDCT images were assessed retrospectively for the number and branching pattern of the renal arteries and for the number and presence of major or minor variants of the renal veins. The results were compared with open surgical results.

Results

The sensitivity and specificity of MDCT for the detection of anatomic variants of renal arteries including the accessory arteries (n = 9), early arterial branching (n = 7) and major renal venous anomalies including the accessory renal veins (n = 3), late venous confluence (n = 4), circumaortic (n = 2) or retroaortic (n = 3) left renal veins were 100%. However, the sensitivity for identification of minor venous variants was 79%. All of three ureteral duplications were correctly identified at excretory phase conventional abdominal radiography.

Conclusion

Sixteen-slice MDCT is highly accurate for the identification of anatomic variants of renal arteries and veins. Dual-phase MDCT angiography including arterial and nephrographic phases followed by conventional abdominal radiography enables complete assessment of renal donors without significant increase of radiation dose. However, the evaluation of minor venous variants may be problematic because of their small diameters and poor opacification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams HL, Faitelson BB (1983) Renal venography. In: Abrams HL (ed) Abrams angiography. Little Brown, Boston, pp 1290–1324

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hänninen EL, Denecke T, Stelter L et al (2005) Preoperative evaluation of living kidney donors using multirow detector computed tomography: comparison with digital substraction angiography and intraoperative findings. Transpl Int 18:1134–1141

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Holden A, Smith A, Dukes P, Pilmore H, Yasutomi M (2005) Assessment of 100 live potential renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multi-detector row helical CT. Radiology 237:973–980

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Jha RC, Korangy SJ, Ascher SM, Takahama J, Kuo PC, Johnson LB (2002) MR angiography and preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 178:1489–1495

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kapoor A, Mahajan G, Singh A, Sarin P (2004) Multispiral computed tomographic angiography of renal arteries of live potential renal donors: a review of 118 cases. Transplantation 77:1535–1539

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kawamoto S, Montgomery RA, Lawler LP, Horton KM, Fishman EK (2003) Multidetector CT angiography for preoperative evaluation of living laparoscopic kidney donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:1633–1638

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kawamoto S, Lawler LP, Fishman EK (2005) Evaluation of the renal venous system on late arterial and venous phase images with MDCT angiography in potential living laparoscopic renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:539–545

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kim JK, Park SY, Kim HJ et al (2003) Living donor kidneys: usefulness of multi-detector row CT for comprehensive evaluation. Radiology 229:869–876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim T, Murakami T, Takahashi S et al (2006) Evaluation of renal arteries in living renal donors: comparison between MDCT angiography and gadolinium-enhanced 3D MR angiography. Radiat Med 24:617–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin CH, Steinberg AP, Ramani AP et al (2004) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in the presence of circumaortic or retroaortic left renal vein. J Urol 171:44–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Nicholson ML, Bradley JA (1999) Renal transplantation from living donors: should be seriously considered to help overcome the shortfall in organs. Br Med J 318:409–410

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Platt JF, Ellis JH, Korobkin M, Reige K (1997) Helical CT evaluation of potential kidney donors: findings in 154 subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol 169:1325–1330

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pollak R, Prusak BF, Mozes MF (1986) Anatomic abnormalities of cadaver kidneys produced for purposes of transplantation. Am Surg 52:233–235

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Raman SS, Pojchamarnwiputh S, Muangsomboon K, Schulam PG, Gritsch HA, Lu DS (2006) Utility of 16-MDCT angiography for comprehensive preoperative vascular evaluation of laparoscopic renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 186:1630–1638

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Raman SS, Pojchamarnwiputh S, Muangsomboon K, Schulam PG, Gritsch HA, Lu DS (2007) Surgically relevant normal and variant renal parenchymal and vascular anatomy in preoperative 16-MDCT evaluation of potential laparoscopic renal donors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:105–114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rastogi N, Sahani DV, Blake MA, Ko DC, Mueller PR (2006) Evaluation of living renal donors: accuracy of three-dimensional 16-section CT. Radiology 240:136–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Rubin GD, Alfrey EJ, Dake MD et al (1995) Assessment of living renal donors with spiral CT. Radiology 195:457–462

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rydberg J, Kopecky KK, Tann M et al (2001) Evaluation of prospective living renal donors for laparoscopic nephrectomy with multisection CT: the marriage of minimally invasive imaging with minimally invasive surgery. Radiographics 21:S223–S236

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rydberg J, Liang Y, Teague SD (2003) Fundamentals of multichannel CT. Radiol Clin North Am 41:465–474

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Smith PA, Ratner LE, Lynch FC, Corl FM, Fishman EK (1998) Role of CT angiography in the preoperative evaluation for laparoscopic nephrectomy. Radiographics 18:589–601

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysel Türkvatan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Türkvatan, A., Akıncı, S., Yıldız, Ş. et al. Multidetector computed tomography for preoperative evaluation of vascular anatomy in living renal donors. Surg Radiol Anat 31, 227–235 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0428-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0428-0

Keywords

Navigation