Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of the adducted or abducted position of the arm on the course of the musculocutaneous nerve during anterior approaches to the shoulder

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nerve injury is a common complication during anterior shoulder surgery. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the musculocutaneous nerve (MN) anatomically and to clarify the relationship of the MN to the glenoid labrum and coracoid process in different arm positions. The study was carried out on 40 shoulders of 20 adult cadavers fixed in 10% formaldehyde. The minimum distance of the MN at the entrance point of the nerve into the coracobrachialis to the anteromedial aspect of the coracoid tip and the distance between the MN and the top, middle, and inferior points of the glenoid labrum were measured. All measurements were performed with a digital caliper while the arm was in a neutral position, 45° and 90° of abduction, 90° of abduction-internal rotation and 90° of abduction-external rotation to evaluate whether arm position effects the results statistically or not. The results demonstrated that the position of the arm significantly changes the distance between the coracoid process (CP) and the MN or its cord. The change in distance between the glenoid labrum and the MN or its cord was also statistically significant. The distance between the CP and MN was greatest when the arm was abducted to 45° (mean 3.4 cm) and least when the arm was positioned to 90° of abduction-internal rotation (mean 2.0 cm). While the distance between the MN and the coracoid process was least at 90° of abduction and internal rotation, the distance between the MN and glenoid labrum was lest with 90° of abduction and external rotation. The distance between the glenoid labrum and MN was greatest with 45° of abduction. The results of this study might be of use in avoiding the MN especially during Bristlow operations and certain rotator cuff procedures. Transferring the coracoid process during Bristow operations or placing arthroscopic portals when the arm is abducted to 45° appears to be the safest position in terms of MN injury. Based on our results, when the arm needs to be abducted to 90° during operation, externally rotating it may decrease the tension on the brachial plexus thus increasing the distance between the MN and the portals or retractors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Apaydin N, Uz A, Bozkurt M, Elhan A (2007) The anatomic relationships of the axillary nerve and surgical landmarks for its localization from the anterior aspect of the shoulder. Clin Anat 20:273–277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boardman ND, Cofield RH (1999) Neurologic complications of shoulder surgery. Clin Orthop 368:44–53

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Castoldi F, Rossi R, Lollino N, Renzulli F, Berrino E, Rossi P (2008) Coracoid transfer in Bristow-Latarjet procedure: does it modify the biceps muscle? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:81–85

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Flatow EL, Bigliani LU, April EW (1989) An anatomic study of the musculocutaneous nerve and its relationship to the coracoid process. Clin Orthop 244:166–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klepps SJ, Goldfarb C, Flatow E, Galatz LM, Yamaguchi K (2001) Anatomic evaluation of the subcoracoid pectoralis major transfer in human cadavers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:453–459

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kline DG, Hudson AR (1995) Stretch injuries to brachial plexus. In: Nerve injuries: operative results for major nerve injuries, entrapments, and tumors. W. B. Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 397–460

  7. Lo IKY, Burkhart SS, Parten PM (2004) Surgery about the coracoid: neurovascular structures at risk. Arthroscopy 20:591–595

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lo IKY, Lind CC, Burkhart SS (2004) Glenohumeral arthroscopy portals established using an outside-in technique: neurovascular anatomy at risk. Arthroscopy 20:596–602

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Matthes G, Horvath V, Seifert J, Ptok H, Stengel D, Schmucker U, Ekkernkamp A, Hinz P (2007) Oldie but goldie: Bristow-Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability. J Orthop Surg 15:4–8

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McFarland EG, Caicedo JC, Guitterez MI, Sherbondy PS, Kim TK (2001) The anatomic relationship of the brachial plexus and axillary artery to the glenoid. Implications for anterior shoulder surgery. Am J Sports Med 29:729–733

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osborne AWH, Birch RM, Munshi P, Bonney G (2000) The musculocutaneous nerve. J Bone Joint Surg 82B:1140–1142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ozturk A, Bayraktar B, Taskara N, Kale AC, Kutlu C, Cecen A (2005) Morphometric study of the nerves entering into the coracobrachialis muscle. Surg Radiol Anat 27:308–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Saeed M, Rufai AA (2003) Median and musculocutaneous nerves: variant formation and distribution. Clin Anat 16:453–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schafhalter-Zoppoth I, Gray AT (2005) The musculocutaneous nerve: ultrasound appearance for peripheral nerve block. Reg Anesth Pain Med 30:385–390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sunderland S (1978) The musculocutaneous nerve. In: Nerves and nerve injuries, 2nd edn. Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 796–801

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Bozkurt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Apaydin, N., Bozkurt, M., Sen, T. et al. Effects of the adducted or abducted position of the arm on the course of the musculocutaneous nerve during anterior approaches to the shoulder. Surg Radiol Anat 30, 355–360 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0336-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0336-3

Keywords

Navigation