Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Comparative study of the anatomy, CT and MR images of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle joint

  • Anatomic Bases of Medical, Radiological and Surgical Techniques
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clinical diagnosis of lateral collateral ligamentous injury caused by ankle sprains depends primarily on clinical signs, and X-ray and CT images. None of these, however, provide direct or accurate information about ligamentous injury. MRI has long been testified as a useful tool in the demonstration of ligaments due to its good resolution of soft tissues. We confirmed the appearance of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle joints on MR images by comparing MR images with CT images of the ligaments enhanced by coating with contrast medium after dissection of six cadaver feet. Compare study of MR images reveals no difference in the natural position and the dorsal position (P > 0.05), whereas, taken into the consideration the long hour of MRI examination, the natural position is regarded as the optimal position for MRI performance. Measured on transverse MR images, lateral ligaments of acutely injured ankles were significantly thicker than those of normal ankles (P < 0.01). According to the MR images of normal and injured ankles, the lateral collateral ligaments injuries were classified as type I and type II. Osteal contusion, cartilaginous injury, musculotendinous injury, tenosynovitis, and peritenosynovitis were also observed by MRI in type I and type II acute lateral collateral ligament injury. All these complications have higher incidence in type II than in type I injury (< 0.05). Thus, by comparing with the CT images and the anatomy we confirmed the normal appearance of the lateral collateral ligaments on MR images and figured out that the natural position is the optimal position for MRI performance. The thickness of the ligaments and incidence of the complications could be regarded as useful cue for the assistant in clinical diagnosis of the lateral collateral ligament injury.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Antonio GE, Griffith JF, Yeung DK (2004) Small-field-of-view MRI of the knee and ankle. Am J Roentgenol 183(1):24–28

    Google Scholar 

  2. Beltran J, Munchow AM, Khabiri H, Magee DG, McGhee RB, Grossman SB (1990) Ligaments of the lateral aspect of the ankle and sinus tarsi: an MR imaging study. Radiol 177(2):455–458

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Breitenseher MJ (2007) Injury of the ankle joint ligaments. Radiol 47(3):216–223

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, Parellada JA, Nothnagel H (2004) MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. Am J Roentgenol 182(1):131–136

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bureau NJ, Cardinal E, Hobden R, Aubin B (2000) Posterior ankle impingement syndrome: MR imaging findings in seven patients. Radiol 215(2):497–503

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cheung Y, Rosenberg ZS (2001) MR imaging of ligamentous abnormalities of the ankle and foot. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 9(3):507–531

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. De Smet AA, Graf BK (1994) Meniscal tears missed on MR imaging: relationship to meniscal tear patterns and anterior cruciate ligament tears. Am J Roentgenol 162(4):905–911

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dong WJ, Ma ZL, Yang YX, Yang GF, Liu GQ, Gong HL, Feng GF, Zhang FC (2004) A study on the sectional and imaging anatomy of the human ankle joints. Chin J Clin Anat 22(1):63–66

    Google Scholar 

  9. Farooki S, Yao L, Seeger LL (1998) Anterolateral impingement of the ankle: effectiveness of MR imaging. Radiol 207(2):357–360

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Flick AB, Gould N (1985) Osteochondritis dissecans of the talus (transchondral fractures of the talus): review of the literature and new surgical approach for medial dome lesions. Foot Ankle 5(4):165–185

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grasel RP, Schweitzer ME, Kovalovich AM, Karasick D, Wapner K, Hecht P, Wander D (1999) MR imaging of plantar fasciitis: edema, tears, and occult marrow abnormalities correlated with outcome. Am J Roentgenol 173(3):699–701

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hardy CJ, Katzberg RW, Frey RL, Szumowski J, Totterman S, Mueller OM (1988) Switched surface coil system for bilateral MR imaging. Radiol 167(3):835–838

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hillier JC, Peace K, Hulme A, Healy JC (2004) Pictorial review: MRI features of foot and ankle injuries in ballet dancers. Br J Radiol 77(918):532–537

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kneeland JB, Hyde JS (1989) High-resolution MR imaging with local coils. Radiol 171(1):1–7

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mabit C, Boncoeur-Martel MP, Chaudruc JM, Valleix D, Descottes B, Caix M (1997) Anatomic and MRI study of the subtalar ligamentous support. Surg Radiol Anat 19(2):111–117

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Masala S, Fiori R, Marinetti A, Uccioli L, Giurato L, Simonetti G (2003) Imaging the ankle and foot and using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Low Extrem Wounds 2(4):217–232

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Muhle C, Frank LR, Rand T, Yeh L, Wong EC, Skaf A, Dantas RW, Haghighi P, Trudell D, Resnick D (1999) Collateral ligaments of the ankle: high-resolution MR imaging with a local gradient coil and anatomic correlation in cadavers. Radiographics 19(3):673–683

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nierhoff CE, Ludwig K (2006) Magnetic resonance imaging of the ankle. Radiologe 46(11):1005–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Oae K, Takao M, Naito K, Uchio Y, Kono T, Ishida J, Ochi M (2003) Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiol 227(1):155–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peterfy CG, Linares R, Steinbach LS (1994) Recent advances in magnetic resonance imaging of the musculoskeletal system. Radiol Clin North Am 32(2):291–311

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Riley GM (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of sports injuries of the foot and ankle: a pictorial essay. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc 97(1):59–67

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Robinson P, White LM (2002) Soft-tissue and osseous impingement syndromes of the ankle: role of imaging in diagnosis and management. Radiographics 22(6):1457–1471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Rosenberg ZS, Beltran J, Bencardino JT (2000) From the RSNA refresher courses. Radiological society of North America. MR imaging of the ankle and foot. Radiographics 20:153–179

    Google Scholar 

  24. Rosenberg ZS, Bencardino J, Astion D, Schweitzer ME, Rokito A, Sheskier S (2003) MRI features of chronic injuries of the superior peroneal retinaculum. Am J Roentgenol 181(6):1551–1557

    Google Scholar 

  25. Sha Y, Zhang SX (2000) Comparative study between the sectional anatomy and MRI of the lateral ligaments of the ankle subtalar joints. Chin J Clin Anat 18(4):289–293

    Google Scholar 

  26. Taser F, Shafiq Q, Ebraheim NA (2006) Anatomy of lateral ankle ligaments and their relationship to bony landmarks. Surg Radiol Anat 28(4):391–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen Long Ding.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hua, J., Xu, J.R., Gu, H.Y. et al. Comparative study of the anatomy, CT and MR images of the lateral collateral ligaments of the ankle joint. Surg Radiol Anat 30, 361–367 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0328-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0328-3

Keywords

Navigation