Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 29, Issue 8, pp 683–687 | Cite as

Intercoccygeal angle and type of coccyx in asymptomatic patients

  • Ulku KerimogluEmail author
  • Merve Gulbiz Dagoglu
  • Fatma Bilge Ergen
Medical Imaging



To assess the intercoccygeal angle of asymptomatic patients (without coccydynia), to study if there is a difference of angle between types of coccyx and between genders with the same type of coccyx.

Materials and methods

Ninety-two patients (42 females, 50 males, range of ages 8–86, mean 50) who underwent computed tomography (CT) angiography and colonoscopy were included in the study. CT images with slice thickness of 1 or 1.5 mm were evaluated with 3D sagittal reformats and intercoccygeal angle, type of coccyx were examined.


Twenty-one females and 18 males had type 1 coccyx with mean intercoccygeal angle 36.4° ± 10.56 (33.29° for females and 40.05° for males) and the difference of the angles between genders is statistically significant (P = 0.044). Among 36 patients (14 were females and 22 were males) with type 2 coccyx demonstrated mean intercoccygeal angle of 56.36° ± 10.8. 15 patients were shown to have type 3 coccyx and the mean intercoccygeal angle was 72.1° ± 31.86. No significant difference of angles was seen between genders. Type 4 coccyx was not seen and two coccyx could not be classified. There was a significant difference of intercoccygeal angle between the groups overall.


Type 1 is the most common coccyx type in asymptomatic patients. Significant difference of intercoccygeal angle was defined between the types of coccyx. These values may be reference for the patients underwent surgery for the coccydynia and a new classification may be needed since exceptional shape of coccyx exists that could not be defined according to the known classification.


Coccyx Intercoccygeal angle Coccydynia Computed tomography Anatomy 


  1. 1.
    Balain B, Eisenstein SM, Alo GO, Darby AJ, Cassar-Pullicino VN, Roberts Se, Jaffray DC (2006) Coccygectomy for coccydynia: case series and review of literature. Spine 31:414–420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borgia C (1964) Coccygodynia: its diagnosis and treatment. Mil Med 129:335–338PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dennell LV, Nathan S (2004) Coccygeal retroversion. Spine 29:256–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Duncan G (1937) Painful coccyx. Arch Surg 37:1088–1104Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Fogel GR, Cunningham PY 3rd, Esses SI (2004) Coccygodynia: evaluation and management. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 12:49–54PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Grassi R, Lombardi G, Reginelli A, Capasso F, Romano F, Floriani I, Colacurci N (2007) Coccygeal movement: assessment with dynamic MRI. Eur J Radiol 61:473–479PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gross NP, Van Dain BE (1995) Total coccygectomy for relief of coccygectomy: A retrospective review. J Spinal Disord 8:328–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hamsa W (1937) Coccygodynia: a study of end result of treatment. J Iowa State Med Soc 27:154–156Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hellberg S, Strange-Vognsen H (1990) Coccygodynia treated by resection of the coccyx. Acta Orthop Scand 61:463–465PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kersey PJ (1980) Non-operative management of coccygodynia. Lancet 1:318PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Key JA (1937) Operative treatment of coccydynia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 19:759–764Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim NH, Kyunk SS (1999) Clinical and radiological differences between traumatic and idiopathic coccygodynia. Yonsei Med J 40:215–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maigne JY, Doursounian L, Chatellier G (2000) Causes and mechanisms of common coccydynia: Role of body mass index and coccygeal trauma. Spine 25:3072–3079PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Maigne JY, Guedj S, Straus C (1994) Idiopathic coccygodynia. Lateral roentgenograms in the sitting position and coccygeal discography. Spine 19:930–934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Maigne JY, Lagauche D, Doursounian L (2000) Instability of the coccyx in coccydynia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 82:1038–1041PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Maigne JY, Tamalet B (1996) Standardized radiologic protocol for the study of common coccygodynia and characteristics of the lesions observed in the sitting position. Clinical elements differentiating luxation, hypermobility, and normal mobility. Spine 21:2588–2593PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Postacchini F, Massobrio M (1983) Idiopathic coccygodynia. Analysis of fifty-one operative cases and a radiographic study of the normal coccyx. J Bone Joint Surg Am 65:1116–1124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pyper JB (1957) Excision of the coccyx for coccydynia: a study of results in twenty-eight cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 39:733–737PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simpson J (1859) Clinical lectures on the diseases of women. Lecture XVII Cocygodynia and dseases and deformities of the coccyx. Medial Times Gazette 40:1–7Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Yamashita K (1988) Radiological study of 1500 coccyces. Nippon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi 62:23–36PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ulku Kerimoglu
    • 1
    Email author
  • Merve Gulbiz Dagoglu
    • 1
  • Fatma Bilge Ergen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of RadiologyHacettepe University, School of MedicineAnkaraTurkey

Personalised recommendations