Skip to main content

Radiological study of the knee joint line position measured from the fibular head and proximal tibial landmarks

Abstract

Restoring the joint line level is one of the surgical challenges during revision of total knee arthroplasty. The position of the tibial surface is commonly estimated by its distance to the apex of fibular head, but no study evaluating this distance accurately has been published yet. The purpose of this work was to study the distance between the knee joint line and the apex of the fibular head and the proximal tibia, particularly the tibial tuberosity. Variability with clinical data and relations with other local measurements have been evaluated on knee radiographs (an antero-posterior view, a medio-lateral view and an anteroposterior full length view) of 100 subjects (125 knees). Results showed no correlation between the joint line–fibular head apex distance and any clinical data of the patients, or any other performed measurements. Relations between tibial measurements and the sexe or the height of the subjects were noted. Besides, the review of the 25 bilateral cases did not show statistically significant side difference but the descriptive analysis showed too large discrepancies for the joint line–fibular head apex distance to be used as a landmark. We conclude that the fibular head apex cannot be used as a morphologic landmark to determine the knee joint line position. Its interest in clinical and surgical practice must be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Brazier J, Migaud H, Gougeon F, Cotten F, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A (1996) Evaluation des méthodes de mesure radiographique de la pente tibiale. Rev Chir Orthop 82:195–200

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dorr LD, Boiardo RA (1986) Technical considerations in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 205:5–11

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Figgie HE, Goldberg VM, Heiple KG, Moller HS, Gordon NH (1986) The influence of tibial-patello-femoral location on function of the knee in patients with the posterior stabilised condylar knee prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg 68A:1035–1040

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hanssen AD (2003) Managing severe bone loss in revision knee arthroplasty. In: Lokte PA, Lonner JH (eds) Master techniques in orthopedic surgery. Knee arthroplasty 2nd edn. Williams and Wilkins, Lippincott, pp 321–344

    Google Scholar 

  5. Julliard R, Genin P, Weil G, Palmkrantz P (1993) La pente tibiale fonctionnelle médiane. Rev Chir Orthop 79:625–634

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Mantas JP, Bloebaum RD, Skedros JG, Hofmann AA (1992) Implications of reference axes used for rotational alignment of the femoral component in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 7:531–535

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mensch JS, Amstutz HA (1975) Knee morphology as a guide to knee replacement. Clin Orthop 112:231–241

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Murshed KA, Cicekcibasi AE, Karabacakoglu A, Seker M, Ziylan T (2005) Distal femur morphometry: a gender and bilateral comparative study using magnetic resonance imaging. Surg Radiol Anat 27:108–112

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Partington PF, Sawhney J, Rorabeck CH, Barrack RL, Moore J (1999) Joint line restoration after revision total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 367:165–171

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ritter MA, Montgomery TJ, Zhou H, Keating ME, Faris PM, Meding JB (1999) The clinical significance of proximal tibial resection level in total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop 360:174–181

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Rojanasthien S, Renzo Okamoto R, Ozawa N, Koshino T (1989) Tibial plateau-fibular head distance of normal japanese knees measured in lateral view of roentgenogram. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 63:1353–1357

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Seedhom BB, Longton EB, Wright V, Dowson D (1972) Dimensions of the knee. Radiographic and autopsy study of sizes required for a knee prosthesis. Ann Rheum Dis 31:54–58

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Stiehl JB, Abott BD (1995) Morphology of the transepicondylar axis and its application in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty. J Artroplasty 10:185–189

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yoshioka Y, Scudamore A, Cooke DV (1989) Tibial anatomy and functional axes. J Orthop Res 7:132–137

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Havet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Havet, E., Gabrion, A., Leiber-Wackenheim, F. et al. Radiological study of the knee joint line position measured from the fibular head and proximal tibial landmarks. Surg Radiol Anat 29, 285–289 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0207-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0207-3

Keywords

  • Knee
  • Joint line
  • Morphometry
  • Preoperative imaging
  • Fibular head
  • Proximal tibia