Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy

, Volume 27, Issue 4, pp 292–296 | Cite as

The diameters of common carotid artery and its branches in newborns

  • Ümit S. ŞehirliEmail author
  • A. Yalin
  • C.M. Tulay
  • Y.O. Cakmak
  • E. Gürdal
Original Article


The common carotid artery (CCA) bifurcation is of clinical importance due to its vascular access site for intravascular intervention. Additionally, it is also one of the most common sites of atherosclerotic plaque formation. There are numerous studies on the diameters of CCA, internal carotid artery (ICA), and external carotid artery (ECA) in adults, but few studies on newborns. Cadaver and angiographic studies have shown dimensional variations in the carotid arteries within/between individuals and also between different sexes. It is well known that the initial lesions of atherosclerosis begin very early in fetal life. Therefore, it is important to know the anatomical details of the CCA and its branches. In the present study, the neck regions of 20 (11 males and 9 females) fixed newborn cadavers were dissected. The CCAs were cut below the bulb of the carotid bifurcation further; ICA and ECA were cut above the bulb of the carotid bifurcation. The internal diameters of the CCA, ICA, and ECA were measured using a light microscopy. ECA/CCA, ICA/CCA, ICA/ECA ratios, and outflow to inflow area ratio were calculated. The mean outflow to inflow area ratio was 1.14±0.28. Our results highly correlated with the defined optimal ratio (1.15). The ECA/CCA, ICA/CCA, and ICA/ECA ratios were 0.78±0.12, 0.71±0.13, and 0.93±0.16, respectively. There were no statistically significant differences between male and female and also between right and left sides. These findings are of importance in understanding the anatomy of carotid artery during newborn period.


Newborn Carotid artery Internal carotid External carotid Atherosclerotic plaque 



We thank Prof Dr. Safiye Çavdar and Dr. Burak Gumuscu for their helpful comments about the article. We would also like to thank Assistant Professor Nural Bekiroğlu for her support during statistical analysis.


  1. 1.
    Bonaldi G (2002) Angioplasty and stenting of the cervical carotid bifurcation: report of a 4-year series. Neuroradiology 44:164–174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Borghi A, Agnoletti G, Poggiani C (2001) Surgical cutdown of the right carotid artery for aortic balloon valvuloplasty in infancy: midterm follow-up. Pediatr Cardiol 22:94–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fagan TE, Ing FF, Edens RE, Caldarone CA, Scholz TD (2000) Balloon aortic valvuloplasty in a 1,600-gram infant. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 50:322–325CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fisher M, Fieman S (1990) Geometric factors of the bifurcation in carotid atherogenesis. Stroke 21:267–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gosling RG, Newman DL, Bowden NLR, Twin KW (1971) The area ratio of normal aortic junctions, aortic configuration and pulse-wave reflection. Br J Radiol 44:850–853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kutuk O, Basaga H (2003) Inflamation meets oxidation: NF-ĸB as a mediator of initial lesion development in atherosclerosis. Trends Mol Med 9:549–557PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Maeno Y, Akagi T, Hashino K, Ishii M, Sugimura T, Takagi J, Suzuki K, Kato H (1997) Carotid artery approach to balloon aortic valvuloplasty in infants with critical aortic valve stenosis. Pediatr Cardiol 18:288–291CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mortensen JD, Talbot S, Burkart JA (1990) Cross-sectional internal diameters of human cervical and femoral blood vessels: relationship to subject’s sex, age, body size. Anat Rec 225:115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Napoli C, Witztum JL, Nigris F, Palumbo G, D’armiento F, Palinski W (1999) Intracranial arteries of human fetuses are more resistant to hypercholestrolemia-induced fatty streak formation than extracranial arteries. Circulation 99:2003–2010PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Robinson VB, Brzezinska-Rajszys G, Weber SH, Ksiazyk J, Fricker JF, Fischer DR, Ettedgui JA (2000) Balloon aortic valvotomy through a carotid cutdown in infants with severe aortic stenosis: results of the multi-centric registry. Cardiol Young 10:225–232PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Schulz UGR, Rothwell PM (2001) Sex differences in carotid bifurcation anatomy and the distribution of atherosclerotic plaque. Stroke 32:1525–1531PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Schulz UGR, Rothwell PM (2001) Major variation in carotid bifurcation anatomy, a possible risk factor for plaque development? Stroke 32:2522–2529PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Smith D, Larsen JL (1979) On the symmetry and asymmetry of the bifurcation of the common carotid artery, a study of bilateral carotid angiograms in 100 adults. Neuroradiology 17:245–247CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Trigaux JP, Delchambre F, Van Beers B (1990) Anatomical variations of the carotid bifurcation; implications for digital subtraction angiography and ultrasonography. Br J Radiol 63:181–185PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ümit S. Şehirli
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Yalin
    • 1
  • C.M. Tulay
    • 1
  • Y.O. Cakmak
    • 1
  • E. Gürdal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of AnatomyMarmara University School of MedicineHaydarpasaTurkey

Personalised recommendations