Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Segmental nerve damage during a McBurney’s incision: a cadaveric study

  • Original article
  • Published:
Surgical and Radiologic Anatomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Injury to the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves after a McBurney’s incision have been reported to cause paralysis of the conjoint tendon that may lead to the development of an indirect inguinal hernia. This study reports on the incidence of ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve sectioning after the performance of a classic McBurney’s incision as well as the distance and relationship of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves to the anterior superior iliac spine and a classic McBurney’s incision. The right iliac fossa and lumbar region of 33 cadavers were dissected for the uncovering of the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves after a correct McBurney’s incision was made. Injury to the ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves was recorded. The mean distance between the ilioinguinal nerve and the incision line was 41.89 mm and 34.63 mm between the iliohypogastric nerve and the incision line. The ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerves were found to be 6.69 mm and 12.08 mm from the anterior superior iliac spine, respectively. No ilioinguinal or iliohypogastric nerve was injured during all 33 McBurney’s incisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arnbjörnsson E (1982) A neuromuscular basis for the development of right inguinal hernia after appendectomy. Am J Surg 143:367–369

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Arnbjörnsson E (1982) Development of right inguinal hernia after appendectomy. Am J Surg 143:174–175

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gue S (1972) Development of right inguinal hernia following appendectomy. Br J Surg 59:352–353

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Karim OM, Boothroyd AE, Wyllie JM (1990) McBurney’s point-fact or fiction. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 72:304–308

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Leech P, Waddell G, Main RG (1972) The incidence of right inguinal hernia following appendectomy. Br J Surg 59:623

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lytle WJ (1970) The deep inguinal ring, development, function and repair. Br J Surg 57:531–536

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Malazgirt Z, Ozen N, Ozkan K (1992) Effect of appendectomy on development of right inguinal hernia. Eur J Surg 158:43–44

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McBurney CH (1889) Experience with early operative interference in cases of disease of the vermiform appendix. NY Med J 21:676–684

    Google Scholar 

  9. McBurney CH (1894) The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis. Ann Surg 20:38

    Google Scholar 

  10. McMinn RM (1990) Last’s anatomy regional and applied, 8th edn. Churchill-Livingstone, Edinburgh, pp 303–361

  11. Naraynsingh V, Ramdass MJ, Singh J, Singh-Rampaul R, Maharaj D (2002) McBurney’ point: are we missing it? Surg Radiol Anat 24:363–365

    Google Scholar 

  12. Neidhardt JPH (1994) Les muscles de l’abdomen. In: Chevrel JP et al (eds) Anatomie clinique, vol 2. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 116–117

  13. Paturet G (1951) Traité d’anatomie humaine. Masson, Paris

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. M. Boon.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jacobs, C.J., Steyn, W.H. & Boon, J.M. Segmental nerve damage during a McBurney’s incision: a cadaveric study. Surg Radiol Anat 26, 66–69 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0189-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-003-0189-8

Keywords

Navigation