Abstract
This study compares conventional drip irrigation (CDI) and partial root drying (PRD) on yield components, oil quality, and economic return of peanut crops in the 2014 and 2015 growing seasons in the Mediterranean climatic conditions of Türkiye. The main plots and subplots consisted of 3 irrigation frequencies (IF25; IF50 and IF75) and 7 irrigation levels (IL0.50 = 0.50, IL0.75 = 0.75, IL1.0 = 1.00, IL1.25 = 1.25, ILPRD50, ILPRD75, and ILPRD100). Of the subplots, 4 were CDI treatments (IL0.50 = 0.50, IL0.75 = 0.75, IL1.0 = 1.00, IL1.25 = 1.25), and 3 were PRD treatments (ILPRD50, ILPRD75, and ILPRD100). CDI treatments (IL0.50, IL0.75, IL1.0, and IL1.25) received 50, 75, 100, and 125 of Cumulative Pan Evaporation. In addition, PRD treatments (ILPRD50, ILPRD75, and ILPRD100) were considered. They received 50, 75, and 100% of IL1.0 treatment from alternate laterals, respectively. The largest and the smallest average peanut yields were obtained from the IF50IL1.25 and IF75IL0.50 treatments each year. The result showed that increasing the irrigation water amount increases the oil yield. The highest oil content, peanut yield, and generating maximum return were obtained from IF50IL1.25 in both growth years. The saturated and unsaturated fatty acid contents were remarkably influenced by IFs and ILs. Stearic acid concentration considerably decreased under unstressed conditions, while palmitic acid values increase. The peanut quality was also affected under water stress with lower oil content. PRD has a marked effect on peanut quality under deficit irrigation of water applied with significantly reduced compared with DI. The high oil yield response factor (kyoil) value acquired for the peanut crop indicated its high sensitivity to irrigation interval and water deficit. It was determined that there are considerable linear relationships between the oleic acid and linoleic acid contents compared to crop evapotranspiration (ETc) during different irrigation intervals in each season. Economic assessment expressed that IF50IL1.25 treatment attained the highest seed and oil yield of peanuts and maximum net return in both seasons. Overall, the findings showed that pod yield per hectare, pod weight per plant, pod number per plant, shelling percentage, palmitic and linoleic acid percentage, oil percentage, and 100-seed weight values increased with increasing irrigation water at each irrigation interval, but oleic and stearic acid percentages decreased in both years.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Data availability
The data that support the fndings of this study are available reasonable request.
References
Akçura S, Taş İ, Kökten K, Kaplan M, Bengü AŞ (2021) Effects of irrigation intervals and irrigation levels on oil content and fatty acid composition of peanut cultivars. Not Bot Horti Agrobot Cluj Napoca 49(2):12224. https://doi.org/10.15835/nbha49212224
Aly EM, El-Etr WMT, Youssef GH (2016) Peanut (Arachis hypogaea l) response to different levels of irrigation stress and synthetic soil amendments. Egypt J Soil Sci 56(2):351–371. https://doi.org/10.21608/EJSS.2016.473
Amir Y, Benbelkacem T, Hadni L, Youyou A (2005) Effect of irrigation and fertilization on characteristics of peanut seeds cultivated near Tizi-Ouzou. J Agric Food Chem 4:879–885
AOCS (2003) Official methods and recommended practices of the American oil chemists society. AOCS Press, Champaign
Aydinsakir K, Dinc N, Buyuktas D, Bastug R, Toker R (2016) Assessment of different irrigation levels on peanut crop yield and quality components under Mediterranean conditions. J Irrig Drain Eng 142:34–39. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001062
Azevedo BM, Sousa GG, Paiva TFP, Mesquita BR, Viana TVA (2017) Manejo da irrigação na cultura do amendoim. Magistra 26:11–18
Bandyopadhyay PK, Mallick S, Rana SK (2005) Water balance and crop coefficients of summer-grown peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) in a humid tropical region of India. Irrig Sci 23(4):161–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-005-0104-7
Barbieri JD, Dallacort R, Faria Junior CA, De Freitas PS, De Carvalho MA (2017) Peanut cultivars submitted to ırrigation levels and nitrogen adubation in tropical climate. Eng Agrícola 37(6):1126–1136. https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v37n6p1126-1136/2017
Bencheva N, Ligeon C, Delikostadinov S, Puppala N, Jolly C (2008) Economic and financial analysis of peanut production in Bulgaria. J Cent Eur Agric 9(2):273–282
Bhalani GK, Parameswaran M (1992) Influence of differential irrigation on kernel lipid profile in groundnut. Plant Physiol Biochem 19:11–14
Bishi SK, Kumar L, Dagla MC, Mahatma MK, Rathnakumar AL, Lalwani HB, Misra JB (2013) Characterization of Spanish peanut germplasm (Arachis hypogaea L.) for sugar profiling and oil quality. Ind Crop Prod 51:46–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.08.050
Boote KJ, Ketring DL (1990) Peanut. In: Stewart B, Nielson D (eds) Irrigation of agricultural crops. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, pp 675–717
Boydak E, Karaaslan D, Turkoglu H (2010) The effect of different nitrogen and irrigation levels on the fatty acid composition of peanut oils. Turkish J Field Crop 15:29–33
Boydak E, Şimşek M, Demirkıran AR (2021) The effects of different ırrigation levels and nitrogen rates on peanut yield and quality in Southeastern Anatolia region of Turkey. KSU J Agric Nat 24(2):306–312. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.763481
Canavar O, Kaynak MA (2013) Determination of yield and yield components and seed quality of peanuts (Arachis hypogaea L) at different harvest times. Intl J Agron Plant Prod 4(5):3791–3803
Chakraborty K, Mahatma MK, Thawait LK, Bishi SK, Kalariya KA, Singh AL (2016) Water deficit stress affects photosynthesis and the sugar profile in the source and sinks tissues of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) and impacts kernel quality. J Appl Bot Food Qual 89:98–104. https://doi.org/10.5073/JABFQ.2016.089.012
Chi B, Zhang Y, Zhang D, Zhang X, Dong H (2019) Wide-strip intercropping of cotton and peanut combined with strip rotation increases crop productivity and economic returns. Field Crop Res 243:107617. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-022-03506-y
Chowdhury FN, Hossain D, Hosen M, Rahman S (2015) Comparative study on the chemical composition of five varieties of groundnut (Arachis Hypogaea L). World J Agric Sci 11(5):247–254. https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.wjas.2015.11.5.1864
Conkerton EJ, Ross LF, Daigle DJ, Kvien CS, Mc-Combs C (1989) The effect of drought stress on peanut seed composition. II. Oil, protein, and minerals. Oleagineux 44:593–599
Dehkordi DD (2020) The effect of different irrigation treatments on yield and water productivity of Arachis Hypogaea L. under semi-arid conditions in Iran. Irrig Drain 69:646–657. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2461
Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1986) Yield Response to Water, vol 33. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper, Rome, Italy, p 193
Dwivedi S, Nigam SN, Nageswara Rao RC, Singh U, Rao KVS (1996) Effect of drought on oil, fatty acids, and protein contents of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) seeds. Field Crops Res 48:125–133. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(96)01027-1
Erdemoğlu N, Akalın ED, Akgöç M, Çıkrıkçı S, Bilsel G (2008) Comparison of the seed oils of Ferulago trachycarpa Boiss. Different localities with respect to fatty acids. Rec Nat Prod 2(1):13–18
Essiari M, Zouhair R, Chimi H (2014) Contribution to the study of the typical characteristics of the virgin olive oils produced in the region of Sais (Morocco). J Int Olive Councill 119:8–21
FAOSTAT (2022) Food and agriculture organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/food-agriculture-statistics/en/. Accessed 9 Aug 2022
Faye B, Webber H, Diop M, Mbaye ML, Owusu-Sekyere JD, Naab J, Gaiser T (2018) Potential impact of climate change on peanut yield in Senegal. West Africa Field Crops Res 219:148–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.034
Fereres E, Soriano MA (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Biol 58:147–159. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl165
França PNO, Faria RT, Carrega WC, Coelho AP, Godoy IJ, Palaretti LF (2021) Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) yield under irrigation levels in off-season cultivation. Rev Fac Cienc Agrar 53(1):55–67
Gulluoglu L, Bakal H, Onat B, El Sabagh A, Arioglu H (2016) Characterization of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) seed oil and fatty acids composition under different growing season under Mediterranean environment. J Exp Biol Agric Sci 4(5S):564–571. https://doi.org/10.18006/2016.4(5S).564.571
Gulluoglu L, Bakal H, Onat B, Kurt C, Arioglu H (2017) Comparison of agronomic and quality characteristics of some peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) varieties grown as main and double crop in Mediterranean region. Turkish J Field Crop 22(2):166–177. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.356208
Haro R, Dardanelli J, Otegui M, Collino D (2008) Seed yield determination of peanut crops under water deficit: soil strength effects on pod set, the source sink ratio and radiation use efficiency. Field Crop Res 109(1–3):24–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2008.06.006
Hashim IB, Koehlerv PE, Eitenmiller RR, Kvien CK (1993) Fatty acid composition and tocopherol content of drought stressed florunner peanuts. Peanut Sci 20:21–24. https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-20-1-6
Hassan U, Ahmed M (2012) Oil and fatty acid composition of peanut cultivars grown in Pakistan. Pak J Bot 44(2):627–630
Idinoba ME, Idinoba PA, Gbadegesin A, Jagtap SS (2008) Growth and evapotranspiration of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea) in a transitional humid zone of Nigeria. Afr J Agric Res 3(5):384–388
Iqbal R, Raza MAS, Toleikiene M, Ayaz M, Hashemi F, Rahman MH, Zaheer MS, Ahmad S, Riaz U, Ali M, Aslam MU, Haider I (2020) Partial root-zone drying (PRD), its effects and agricultural significance: a review. Bull Natl Res Cent 44:159. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42269-020-00413-w
Jain NK, Meena HN, Bhaduri D, Yadav RS (2018) Drip fertigation and irrigation interval effects on growth, productivity, nutrient, and water economy in summer peanut. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 49(19):2406–2417. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2018.1510951
Jensen ME, Burman RD, Allen RG (1990) Evapotranspiration and irrigation water requirements. ASCE, New York. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784414057
Jovanovic Z, Stikic R (2018) Partial root-zone drying technique: from water saving to the improvement of a fruit quality. Front Sustain Food Syst 1:1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2017.00003
Junior EGS, Simionatto E, Perez VH, Justo OR, Zárate AH, Vieira MC (2016) Potential of Virginia-type peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) as feedstock for biodiesel production. Ind Crops Prod 89:448–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.050
Kaba JS, Ofori K, Kumaga FK (2014) Inter-relationships of yield and components of yield at different stages of maturity in three groundnuts (Arachis hypogaea L) varieties. Int J Life Sci Res 2(1):43–48
Kambiranda DM, Vasanthaiah HKN, Ananga RKA, Basha SM, Naik K (2011) Impact of drought stress on peanut (Arachis hypogaea L) productivity and food safety. In: Vasanthaiah H, Kambiranda DM (eds) Plants and environment. InTech, Croatia, pp 249–272. https://doi.org/10.5772/27917
Kheira AAA (2009) Macro management of deficit-irrigated peanut with sprinkler irrigation. Agric Water Manage 9:1409–1420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.05.002
Kiniry JR, Simpson CE, Schubert AM, Reed JD (2005) Peanut leaf area index, light interception, radiation use efficiency, and harvest index at three sites in Texas. Field Crop Res 91(2–3):297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.07.021
Knauft A, Norden AJ, Gorbet DW (1986) The effect of three digging dates on oil quality, yield, and grade of five peanut genotypes grown without leaf spot control. Peanut Sci 13:86–89. https://doi.org/10.3146/i0095-3679-13-2-11
Lamb MC, Rowland DL, Sorensen RB, Butts RB, Faircloth CL, Nutt RC (2007) Economic returns of irrigated and non-irrigated peanut-based cropping systems. Peanut Sci 34:10–16
Liu X, Wei Z, Manevski K, Liu J, Ma Y, Andersen MN, Liu F (2021) Partial root-zone drying irrigation increases water-use efficiency of tobacco plants amended with biochar. Ind Crops Prod 166:113487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113487
Nageswara RC, Williams JH, Sivakumar MVK, Wadia KRD (1998) Effect of water deficit at different growth phases of peanut. Response to drought during-flowering phase. Agron J 80:431–438. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1988.00021962008000030010x
Onemli F (2012) Impact of climate changes on oil fatty acid composition of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in three market classes. Chilean J Agri Res 72(4):383–488. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392012000400004
Patel GN, Patel PT, Patel PH (2008) Yield, water use efficiency, and moisture extraction pattern of summer groundnut as influenced by irrigation schedules, sulfur levels, and sources. ICRISAT 6(1):1–4
Pereira JWL, Albuquerque MB, Melo Filho PA, Nogueira RJMC, Lima LM, Santos RC (2016) Assessment of drought tolerance of peanut cultivars based on physiological and yield traits in a semiarid environment. Agric Water Manag 166:70–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2015.12.010
Rao RCN, Singh S, Siva Kumar MVK, Srivastava KL, Williams JH (1985) Effect of water deficit at different growth phases of peanut I. Yield responses. Agron J 7:782–785. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1985.00021962007700050026x
Rathore VS, Nathawat NS, Bhardwaj S, MalYadav B, Kumar M, Santra P, Kumar P, Reager ML, Yadava ND, Yadav OM (2021) Optimization of deficit irrigation and nitrogen fertilizer management for peanut production in an arid region. Sci Rep 11:5456. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-82968-w
Reddy TY, Reddy VR, Anbunbumozhi V (2003) Physiological responses of groundnut (Arachis hypogea L.) to drought stress and its amelioration: a critical review. Plant Growth Regul 41:75–88. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1027353430164
Rowland DL, Faircloth WH, Payton P, Tissue DT, Ferrell JA, Sorensen RB, Butts CL (2012) Primed acclimation of cultivated peanut through the use of deficit irrigation timed to crop developmental period. Agric Water Manage 113:85–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2012.06.023
Sadras VO (2009) Does partial root-zone drying improve irrigation water productivity in the field? A meta-analysis. Irrig Sci 27:183–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0141-0
Sarma PS, Sivakumar MVK (1989) Response of groundnut to drought stress in different growth phases. Agric Water Manage 15:301–310. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-3774(89)90022-X
Sarr B, Lecoeur J, Clouvel P (2004) Irrigation scheduling of confectionery groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in Senegal using a simple water balance model. Agric Water Manage 67(3):201–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.01.004
Schulte E, Weber K (1989) Schnelle Herstellung der Fettsäuremethylester aus Fetten mit Trimethylsulphonium-hydroxid. Fat Sci Technol 91:181–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/lipi.19890910504
Selvam VS, Rao GNS, Rahab MS (1989) Mid-season correction for groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) during moisture stress period. Indian J Agric Sci 59:795–796
Sepaskhah AR, Ahmadi SH (2010) A review on partial root-zone drying irrigation. Int J Plant Prod 4(4):241–258. https://doi.org/10.22069/IJPP.2012.708
Sezen SM, Tekin S, Konuşkan DB (2019a) Effect of ırrigation strategies on yield of drip ırrigated sunflower oil and fatty acid composition and its economic returns. J Agric Sci 25:163–173. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.382617
Sezen SM, Yucel S, Tekin S, Yıldız M (2019b) Determination of optimum irrigation and effect of deficit irrigation strategies on yield and disease rate of peanut irrigated with drip system in Eastern Mediterranean. Agric Water Manage 221:211–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.04.033
Shahnazari A, Liu F, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR (2007) Effects of partial root-zone drying on yield, tuber size and water use efficiency in potato under field conditions. Field Crops Res 100:117–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2006.05.010
Shahrokhnia MH, Sepaskhah AR (2017) Physiologic and agronomic traits in safflower under various irrigation strategies, planting methods and nitrogen fertilization. Ind Crops Prod 95:126–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.10.021
Singh AL, Nakar RN, Goswami N, Kalariya KA, Chakraborty K, Singh M (2013) Water deficit stress and its management in groundnuts. Adv Plant Physiol 14:370–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40502-018-0361-0
Songsri P, Jogloy S, Holbrook CC, Kesmala T, Vorasoot N, Akkasaeng C, Patanothai A (2009) Association of root, specific leaf area and SPAD chlorophyll meter reading to water use efficiency of peanut under different available soil water. Agric Water Manag 96:790–798. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2008.10.009
Sorensen RB, Butts CL, Rowland DL (2005) Five years of subsurface drip irrigation on peanut: what have we learned? Peanut Sci 32:14–19. https://doi.org/10.3146/0095-3679(2005)32[14:FYOSDI]2.0.CO;2
Srinivasan PS, Sathasivam R, Anjuman A, Ramalingam RS, Bhat MV (1987) Effect of water stress on partitioning of dry matter and crop growth rate in relation to productivity in groundnut cultivars. J Oilseeds Res 4:89–96
Stalker HT (1997) Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.). Field Crops Res 53:205–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00032-4
Stansell JR, Pallas JE (1985) Yield and quality response of Florunner peanut to applied drought in several growth stages. Peanut Sci 12:64–70. https://doi.org/10.3146/pnut.12.2.0005
Stirling CM, Black CR, Ong CK (1989) The response of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) to timing of Irrigation II. 14C partitioning and plant water status. J Exp Bot 40:1363–1373. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/40.10.1145
Stone KC, Bauer PJ, Busscher WJ, Millen JA, Evans DE, Strickland EE (2015) Variable-rate irrigation management using an expert system in the eastern coastal plain. Irrig Sci 33(3):167–175. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-014-0457-x
Suleiman AA, Soler CMT, Hoogenboom G (2013) Determining FAO-56 crop coefficients for peanuts under different water stress levels. Irrig Sci 31:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0301-5
Sundaram J, Kandala CV, Holser RA, Christopher L, Windham R (2010) Determination of in-shell peanut oil and fatty acid composition using near-infrared reflectance spectroscopy. J Am Oil Chem’ Soc 87(10):1103–1114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11746-010-1589-7
Tigner R (2018) “Partial budgeting: a tool to analyze farm business changes.” File C1-50. Ag. Decision Maker. Iowa State University, Extension, and Outreach, Available at https://www.extension.iastate.edu/agdm/ wholefarm/pdf/c1-50.pdf. Accessed 10 Dec 2018.
Topak R, Suheri S, Acar B (2011) Effect of different drip irrigation regimes on sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) yield, quality and water use efficiency in Middle Anatolian. Turkey Irrig Sci 29:79–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0219-3
TUIK (2021) Turkish Statistical Institute. Peanut production, Turkish
USDA (2021) United States Deptartment of Agriculture Foreign Agriculture Service. IPAD (International Production Assessment Division), Peanut, 2021.
Wang ML, Chen CY, Tonnis B, Pinnow D, Davis J, An YC, Dang P (2018) Changes of seed weight, fatty acid composition, and oil and protein contents from different peanut FAD2 genotypes at different seed developmental and maturation stages. J Agric Food Chem 66(14):3658–3665. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01238
Wei Z, Du T, Li X, Fang L, Liu F (2018) Interactive effects of CO2 concentration elevation and nitrogen fertilization on water and nitrogen use efficiency of tomato grown under reduced irrigation regimes. Agric Water Manag 202:174–182. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2018.00328
Wright GC, Hubic KT, Farquhar GD (1991) Physiological analysis of peanut cultivar response to timing and duration of drought stress. Aust J Exp Agric 42(3):453–470. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR9910453
Younis ASM, Nassar SMA, Al-Naggar AMM, Bakry BA (2020) Phenotypic assessment of genetic diversity among twenty groundnut genotypes under well-watered and water-stressed conditions using multivariate analysis. Asian J Plant Sci 19(4):474–486. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2020.474.486
Zhu H, Lamb MC, Butts CL, Blankenship PD (2004) Improving peanut yield and grade with surface drip irrigation in undulating fields. Trans ASAE 47(1):99–106. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.15875
Zurweller BA, Xavier A, Tillman BL, Mahan JR, Payton PR, Puppala N, Rowland D (2018) Pod yield performance and stability of peanut genotypes under differing soil water and regional conditions. J Crop Improv 32(4):532–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427528.2018.1458674
Acknowledgements
The data for this article were obtained from the TAGEM/TSKAD/14A13/P02/06 project final report and a part of the article by Sezen et al. (2019b). All financing and procurement of this project were supported by TAGEM. We thank TAGEM for their support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All the research was leaded by SMS. All authors contributed to the study’s conception and experimental design. Material preparation, data collection, analysis, and designed the figures and tables were performed by SMS, SSY, DBK, IY, MY, OK and CMM. All authors provided critical feedback and helped shape the research, analysis, and manuscript, and also approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sezen, S.M., Yamaç, S.S., Konuşkan, D.B. et al. Comparison of the partial root drying and conventional drip irrigation regimes on seed, oil yield quality, and economic return for peanut crop. Irrig Sci 41, 603–628 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00854-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00854-x