Skip to main content

Optimal coupling combinations between dripper discharge and irrigation interval of maize for seed production under plastic film-mulched drip irrigation in an arid region

A Correction to this article was published on 27 October 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

Drip irrigation combined with film mulching significantly improved water saving and agricultural efficiency in arid and semi-arid regions. However, the impact of various irrigation technical parameters under plastic film-mulched (PM) drip irrigation on water consumption and maize yield (Zea mays L.) for seed production is still unclear. Field experiments were conducted between 2016 and 2018 in Northwest China to investigate the effects of irrigation technical parameters (dripper discharge and irrigation interval) on biomass, grain yield, water, and nitrogen (N) use efficiency of the PM-maize for seed production. Four dripper discharges (1.38 L h−1, 2.0 L h−1, 2.5 L h−1, 3.0 L h−1) and five irrigation intervals (6 days, 8 days, 10 days, 12 days, 14 days) were selected. The normalized yield was used to analyze the effect of different treatments on the yield to eliminate the differences caused by uncontrollable factors, such as precipitation and temperature between different years. The results indicated a quadratic function among the final aboveground biomass, grain yield of maize for seed production, and irrigation intervals, with the highest value observed at 8 days irrigation interval. Both yield and nitrogen use efficiency measured as partial factor productivity of nitrogen (PFPN) decreased rapidly as the irrigation interval exceeded 10 days. When the irrigation interval increased from 10 to 14 days, the relative grain yield decreased between 6.5 and 16.0%, while the PFPN decreased between 1.1 and 99.2 kg kg−1. Crop evapotranspiration (ET) initially decreased and then increased as the irrigation interval increased. The water productivity (WPY-ET) was the highest at the irrigation interval of 8 days. The PFPN increased between 6.6 and 42.8 kg kg−1 at the dripper discharge of 3.0 L h−1 when compared with dripper discharge of 2.5 L h−1. The study showed an optimal dripper discharge–irrigation interval combination for maximizing water-resources utilization and yield increase. When biomass, grain yield, ET, and WPY-ET are considered simultaneously, the most suitable irrigation technical parameters of maize for seed production in Northwest China are the combination of 2.5 L h−1 and 8 days. Furthermore, a combination of 3.0 L h−1 and 8 days is more conducive to reducing fertilizer costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Change history

References

  1. Abdullah O (2006) Effect of different irrigation intervals to drip irrigated dent Corn (Zea mays L. indentata) water-yield relationship. Pak J Biol Sci 9(8):1476–1481

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ali H, Ahmed N, Abu-Hashim M (2019) Potential effect of irrigation intervals and potassium phthalate on fennel plants grown in semi-arid regions. Egypt J Soil Sci 60(1):83–98

    Google Scholar 

  3. Allen RG, Pereia LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration: guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO, Rome

  4. Amin MT, Anjum L, Alazba AA, Rizwan M (2015) Effect of the irrigation frequency and quality on yield, growth and water productivity of maize crops. Qual Assur Saf Crop 7(5):721–730

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bai S, Kang Y, Wan S (2020) Winter wheat growth and water use under different drip irrigation regimes in the North China Plain. Irrig Sci 38(3):321–335

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benasher J, Charach C, Zemel A (1986) Infiltration and water extraction from trickle irrigation source: the effective hemisphere model. Soil Sci Soc Am J 50(4):882–887

    Google Scholar 

  7. Boamah PO, Sam-Amoah LK, Owusu-Seky JD (2010) Effect of irrigation interval on growth and development of tomato under sprinkler. Afr J Agric Res 4(4):196–203

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brar HS, Vashist KK (2020) Drip irrigation and nitrogen fertilization alter phenological development and yield of spring maize (Zea mays L.) under semi-arid conditions. J Plant Nutr 43(12):1757–1767

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bresler E (1978) Analysis of trickle irrigation with application to design problem. Irrig Sci 1(1):3–17

    Google Scholar 

  10. Bresler E, Kemper WD (1970) Soil water evaporation as affected by wetting methods and crust formation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 34(1):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cassman KG, Gines GC, Dizon MA, Samson MI, Alcantara JM (1996) Nitrogen-use efficiency in tropical lowland rice systems: contributions from indigenous and applied nitrogen. Field Crop Res 47(1):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Colombo A, Or D (2006) Plant water accessibility function: a design and management tool for trickle irrigation. Agric Water Manag 82(1):45–62

    Google Scholar 

  13. El-Hendawy SE, Schmidhalter U (2009) Optimal coupling combinations between irrigation frequency and rate for drip-irrigated maize grown on sandy soil. Agric Water Manag 97(3):439–448

    Google Scholar 

  14. Geerts S, Raes D (2009) Deficit irrigation as an on-farm strategy to maximize crop water productivity in dry areas. Agric Water Manag 96(9):1275–1284

    Google Scholar 

  15. Guinn G, Mauney JR, Fry KE (1981) Irrigation scheduling and plant population effects on growth, bloom rates, boll abscission, and yield of cotton. Agron J 73(3):529–534

    Google Scholar 

  16. EI-Hendawy SE, Hokam EM, Schmidhalter U (2008) Drip irrigation frequency:the effects and their interaction with nitrogen fertilization on sandy soil water distribution, maize yield and water use efficiency under Egyptian conditions. J Agron Crop Sci 194(3):180–192

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hokam EM, El-Hendawy SE, Schmidhalter U (2011) Drip irrigation frequency: the effects and their interaction with nitrogen fertilization on maize growth and nitrogen use efficiency under arid conditions. J Agron Crop Sci 197(3):186–201

    Google Scholar 

  18. Huang XF, Hu B, Ou SX (2019) Effects of drip irrigation zone layout and drip head flow on soil water and nitrogen distribution and spring wheat yield. Agric Eng 9(10):81–87

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jiang XL, Tong L, Kang SZ, Li FS, Li DH, Qin YH, Shi RC, Li JB (2018) Planting density affected biomass and grain yield of maize for seed production in an arid region of Northwest China. J Arid Land 10(2):292–303

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kang SZ, Hao XM, Du TS, Tong L, Su XL, Lu HN, Li XL, Huo ZL, Li SE, Ding RS (2017) Improving agricultural water productivity to ensure food security in China under changing environment: from research to practice. Agric Water Manag 179:5–17

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar M, Pannu RK, Singh B, Dhaka AK (2017) Response of irrigation frequency and nitrogen levels on relative water content, canopy temperature, water potential and chlorophyll content of late sown wheat. Int J Pure Appl Biosci 5(2):173–179

    Google Scholar 

  22. Li M, Guo P (2015) Water resources management models based on two-level linear fractional programming method under uncertainty. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(9):05–15

    Google Scholar 

  23. Li MS, Kang SZ, Sun HY (2006) Study on the relationship between drip head flow and wetting body of point source drip irrigation. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 22(4):32–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Li F, Ma C, Hao LH, Li SB, Zheng YP (2019) Effects of discharge of dripper on soil water and heat energy movements under water storage pit irrigation. In: Dong W et al (eds) Sustainable development of water resources and hydraulic engineering in China. Springer, China, pp 399–406. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61630-8_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Liu T, Wu X, Zheng ZC, Li TX (2016) Effects of irrigation frequency on water and salt movement in greenhouse soil. J Ecol Rural Environ 32(4):622–631

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Liu H, Gao Y, Sun JS, Wu XL, Li Y (2017) Responses of yield, water use efficiency and quality of short-season cotton to irrigation management: interactive effects of irrigation methods and deficit irrigation. Irrig Sci 35(2):125–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lopes LN, Martins E, Santoro BL, Souza CF (2009) Water distribution characterization in soil for drip irrigation. IRRIGA 14(4):564–577

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meng QF, Sun QP, Chen XP, Cui ZL, Rmheld V (2012) Alternative cropping systems for sustainable water and nitrogen use in the North China Plain. Agric Ecosyst Environ 146(1):93–102

    Google Scholar 

  29. Meshkat M, Warner RC, Workman SR (2000) Evaporation reduction potential in an undisturbed soil irrigated with surface drip and sand tube irrigation. Trans ASAE 43(1):79–86

    Google Scholar 

  30. Montoro A, Mañas F, López-Urrea R (2016) Transpiration and evaporation of grapevine, two components related to irrigation strategy. Agric Water Manag 177:193–200

    Google Scholar 

  31. Oktem A (2006) Effect of different irrigation intervals to drip irrigated dent corn (Zea mays L. indentata) water-yield relationship. Pak J Biol Sci 9(8):1476–1481

    Google Scholar 

  32. Oladele AG, Sunday FA, Samuel SO, Afolabi JT, Dorcas OA (2016) Effect of drip irrigation frequency and N-fertilization on soil physical properties, yield and water use efficiency of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) in Ado Ekiti, Southwestern Nigeria. J Biol Agric Healthc 6(4):32–46

    Google Scholar 

  33. Padrón RAR, Lopes SJ, Renedo VSG (2018) Estimation of the optimal plot size and number of replications in a field pepper crop experiment with varying irrigation depths and application frequencies. Sci Hortic 237:96–104

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rana G, Katerji N (2000) Measurement and estimation of actual evapotranspiration in the field under Mediterranean climate: a review. Eur J Agron 13(2–3):125–153

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rasool G, Guo XP, Wang ZC, Ullah I, Chen S (2020) Effect of two types of irrigation on growth, yield and water productivity of maize under different irrigation treatments in an arid environment. Irrig Drain 69(4):732–742

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sabra AS, Astatkie T, Alataway A, Mahnoud AA, Gendy ASH, Ahl S-A, Hussein AH, Tkachenk KG (2018) Response of biomass development, essential oil and composition of plectranthus amboinicus (Lour.) spreng to irrigation frequency and harvest time. Chem Biodivers 15(3):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sensoy S, Ertek A, Gedik I, Kucukyumuk C (2007) Irrigation frequency and amount affect yield and quality of field-grown melon (Cucumis melo L.). Agric Water Manag 88(1–3):269–274

    Google Scholar 

  38. Skaggs TH, Trout TJ, Rothfuss Y (2010) Drip irrigation water distribution patterns: effects of emitter rate, pulsing, and antecedent water. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74(6):1886–1896

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Sun H, Li MS, Ding H, Wang YX, Cui WM (2009) Experiments on effect of dripper discharge on cotton-root distribution. Trans Chin Soc Agric Eng 25(11):13–18

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wang FX, Kang Y, Liu SP (2006) Effects of drip irrigation frequency on soil wetting pattern and potato growth in North China Plain. Agric Water Manag 79(3):248–264

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wang ZH, Zheng XR, Ren J, An JB (2007) Experimental study on the influence of irrigation frequency on soil water movement law of infiltration by underground drip irrigation line source. J Hydraul Eng S1:299–302

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wang XK, Li ZB, Xing YY (2014) Effects of dripper discharge and irrigation frequency on growth and yield of maize in loess plateau of northwest China. Pak J Bot 46(3):1019–1025

    Google Scholar 

  43. Yu M, Yang JS, Liu MX, Li XM, Wang J (2010) Effects of different mulched drip irrigation modes on soil moisture and cotton yield. J Agro Environ Sci 29(12):2368–2374

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang L, Fan XK, Wu PT, Niu WQ, Yu LM (2010) Experimental research on crop growth under low flow and micro-pressure drip Irrigation. J Irrig Drain 29(2):65–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are extremely grateful to the anonymous reviewers and editors for their thoughtful suggestions and valuable comments, which are helpful in improving the manuscript. This research was financially supported by the Government Public Research Funds for Projects of the Ministry of Agriculture (201503125).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ling Tong.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, S., Tong, L., Kang, S. et al. Optimal coupling combinations between dripper discharge and irrigation interval of maize for seed production under plastic film-mulched drip irrigation in an arid region. Irrig Sci (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-021-00739-x

Download citation