Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Irrigation return flow and nutrient movement mitigation by irrigation method for container plant production

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The production of nursery crops demands substantial irrigation, with overhead irrigation the most common method of application; however, this method is inefficient with respect to water used and the precision with which it is applied, resulting in the generation of irrigation return flow and concomitant agrochemical export. Microirrigation systems such as individual container spray stakes provide water directly to crops thus applying water more efficiently than overhead systems but may be more costly in terms of installation (smaller pipes and components; however, a greater quantity of pipes and components) and maintenance. The study was conducted at the Michigan State University Research Nursery, where four ornamental shrub taxa were produced in #3 (11.3 L) containers using a control with 19 mm overhead irrigation per day and a conventional phosphorus fertilizer (Conv) (19-2.16-6.64), compared with four treatments: a static, daily (2 L per container) spray stake irrigation (SS2Lpd) and conventional phosphorus fertilizer; a static daily (2 L per container) spray stake irrigation and low phosphorus fertilizer (LowP) (19-1.62-6.64); spray stake irrigation based on substrate volumetric water content (θ) (up to 2.4 L per container) (SSθ) and conventional fertilizer; and spray stake irrigation based on θ (up to 2.4 L per container) and low phosphorus fertilizer. Spray stakes reduced irrigation by 76–80% compared to the overhead control, and reduced the generation of both surface and subsurface irrigation return flow (IRF), mitigating the movement of both N and P (over 98% reduction in surface IRF). Plant growth index (GI) was measured on 12 June 2017 and 6 October 2017, followed by a destructive harvest to measure shoot dry weight, and shoot nutritional content. For all four taxa, microirrigation systems were capable of producing plants of equivalent GI and shoot nutritional concentration; however, plants receiving the low phosphorus fertilizer produced less shoot biomass. Microirrigation is effective in reducing water use, water lost to IRF (particularly surface IRF), and associated fertilizer movement, while maintaining crop size.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1.
Figure 2.
Figure 3.
Figure 4.
Figure 5.
Figure 6.
Figure 7.
Figure 8.
Figure 9.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdi DE, Fernandez RT (2019) Reducing water and pesticide movement in nursery production. HortTechnology 29:730–735

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Abouali M, Nejadhashemi AP, Daneshvar F, Adhikari U, Herman MR, Calappi TJ, Rohn BG (2017) Evaluation of wetland implementation strategies on phosphorus reduction at a watershed scale. J Hydrol 552:105–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Agro E, Zheng Y (2014) Controlled-release fertilizer application rates for container nursery crop production in southwestern Ontario. Canada HortScience 49:1414–1423

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer A, Mahbub I, Chappell M, Ruter J, van Iersel MW (2013) Water use and growth of Hibiscus acetosella ‘Panama Red’ grown with a soil moisture sensor-controlled irrigation system. HortScience 48:980–987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bayer A, Ruter J, van Iersel MW (2015) Automated irrigation control for improved growth and quality of Gardenia jasminoides ‘Radicans’ and ‘August Beauty.’ HortScience 50:78–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson RC Jr, Knox GW (1991) Analysis of efficiency of overhead irrigation in container production. HortScience 26:848–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson RC Jr, Yeager TH (2003) Plant canopy affects sprinkler irrigation application efficiency of container-grown ornamentals. HortScience 38:1373–1377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beeson RC, Arnold MA, Bilderback TE, Bolusky B, Chandler S, Gramling HM, Lea-Cox JD, Harris JR, Klinger PJ, Mathers HM, Ruter JM, Yeager TH (2004) Strategic vision of container nursery irrigation in the next ten years. J Environ Hortic 22:113–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berghage RD, MacNeal EP, Wheeler EF, Zachritz WH (1999) “Green” water treatment for the green industries: opportunities for biofiltration of greenhouse and nursery irrigation water and runoff with constructed wetlands. HortScience 34:50–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilderback TE (2002) Water management is key in reducing nutrient runoff from container nurseries. HortTechnology 12:541–544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burnett SE, van Iersel MW (2008) Morphology and irrigation efficiency of Gaura lindheimeri grown with capacitance sensor-controlled irrigation. HortScience 43:1555–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clean Water Act (CWA); https://www.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-clean-water-act) (Accessed 23 September 2020). 33 U.S.C. §1251 et seq. (1972)

  • Davies MJ, Harrison-Murray R, Atkinson CJ, Grant OM (2016) Application of deficit irrigation to container-grown hardy ornamental nursery stock via overhead irrigation, compared to drip irrigation. Agr Water Manage 163:244–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis JH, Lopez RG, Behe BK, Hall CR, Yue C, Campbell BL (2010) Sustainable production practices adopted by greenhouse and nursery plant growers. HortScience 45:1232–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Nitrate Directive (END): (https://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-nitrates/index_en.html) (Accessed 23 September 2020). Adopted 12 December 1991.

  • Döll P (2009) Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: a global-scale assessment. Environ Res Lett 4:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Water Framework Directive (EWFD): (https://ec.europa.eu/environment/water/water-framework/index_en.html) (Accessed 23 September 2020). Adopted 23 October 2000.

  • Faustino LI, Moretti AP, Graciano C (2015) Fertilization with urea, ammonium, and nitrate produce different effects on growth, hydraulic traits and drought tolerance in Pinus taeda seedlings. Tree Physiol 35:1062–1074

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández JE (2017) Plant-based methods for irrigation scheduling of woody crops. Horticulturae 3:1–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez RT, Pershey NA, Andresen JA, Cregg BM (2019) Water conserving irrigation practices, plant growth, seasonal crop coefficients, and nutrition of container-grown woody ornamentals. Water 11:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fields JS, Owen JS Jr, Altland JE, van Iersel MW, Jackson BE (2018) Soilless substrate hydrology can be engineered to influence plant water status for an ornamental containerized crop growth within optimal water potentials. J AmerSocHortSci 143:268–281

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher AF, Buxton JW, Geneve RL (2012) Developing a physiological-based, on demand irrigation system for container production. SciHortic 138:221–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulcher A, LeBude AV, Owen JS Jr, White SA, Beeson RC (2016) The next ten years: strategic vision of water resources for nursery producers. HortTechnology 26:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garber MP, Ruter JM, Midcap JT, Bondari K (2002) Survey of container nursery irrigation practices in Georgia. HortTechnology 12:727–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray HCJ, Beddington JR, Crute IR, Haddad L, Lawrence D, Muir JF, Pretty J, Robinson S, Thomas SM, Toulmin C (2010) Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327:812–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heathwaite AL, Dils RM (2000) Characterising phosphorus loss in surface and subsurface hydrological pathways. Sci of the Total Environ 251(252):523–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinz FO, Albano JP, Wilson PC (2019) Phosphate removal from nursery runoff water using an iron-based remediation system. Water 11:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Hua G, Salo MW, Schmit CG, Hay CH (2016) Nitrate and phosphate removal from agricultural subsurface drainage using laboratory woodchip bioreactors and recycled steel byproduct filters. Water Res 102:180–189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Incrocci L, Marzialetti P, Incrocci G, Di Vita A, Balendonck J, Bibbiani C, Spagnol S, Pardossi A (2014) Substrate water status and evapotranspiration irrigation scheduling in heterogenous container nursery crops. Agr Water Mgmt 131:30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Incrocci L, Marzialetti P, Incrocci G, Di Vita A, Balendonck J, Bibbiani C, Spagnol S, Pardossi A (2019) Sensor-based management of container nursery crops irrigated with fresh or saline water. Agr Water Mgmt 213:49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight J, Abdi DE, Ingram DL, Fernandez RT (2019) Water scarcity footprint analysis of container-grown plants in a model research nursery as affected by irrigation and fertilization treatments. Water 11:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lamack WF, Niemera AX (1993) Application method affects water application efficiency of spray stake-irrigated containers. HortScience 28:625–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenberg E, Majsztrik J, Saavoss M (2013) Profitability of sensor-based irrigation in greenhouse and nursery crops. HortTechnology 23:770–774

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Wu L, Newman J, Faber B, Gan J (2006) Degradation of pesticides in nursery recycling ponds. J Agr Food Chem 54:2658–2663

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majsztrik JC, Fernandez RT, Fisher PR, Hitchcock DR, Lea-Cox J, Owen JS Jr, Oki LR, White SA (2017) Water use and treatment in container-grown specialty crop production: a review. Water Air Soil Poll 228:1–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majsztrik JC, Ristvey AG, Ross DS, Lea-Cox JD (2018) Comparative water and nutrient application rates among ornamental operations in Maryland. HortScience 53:1364–1371

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Majsztrik JC, Behe B, Hall CR, Ingram DL, Lamm AJ, Warner LA, White SA (2019) Social and economic aspects of water use in specialty crop production in the USA: a review. Water 11:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mangiafico SS, Gan J, Wu L, Lu J, Newman JP, Faber B, Merhaut DJ, Evans R (2008) Detention and recycling basins for managing nutrient and pesticide runoff from nurseries. HortScience 43:393–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathers HM, Yeager TH, Case LT (2005) Improving irrigation water use in container nurseries. HortTechnology 15:8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Million JB, Yeager TH (2015) Capture of Sprinkler Irrigation Water by Container-grown Ornamental Plants. HortScience 50:442–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niu G, Rodriguez DS, Cabrera R, McKenney C, Mackay W (2006) Determining water use and crop coefficients of five woody landscape plants. J Environ Hortic 24:160–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owen JS Jr, Warren SL, Bilderback TE, Albano JP (2008) Phosphorus rate, leaching fraction, and substrate influence on influent quantity, effluent nutrient content, and response of a containerized woody ornamental crop. HortScience 43:906–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks SE, Haigh AM, Cresswell GC (2000) Stem tissue phosphorus as an index of the phosphorus status of Banksia ericifolia L. f. Plant Soil 227:59–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pershey NA, Cregg BM, Andresen JA, Fernandez RT (2015) Irrigating based on daily water use reduces nursery runoff volume and nutrient load without reducing growth of four conifers. HortScience 50:1553–1561

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Berger B, Filiberto D, Newton M, Wolfe B, Karabinakis E, Clark S, Poon E, Abbett E, Nandagopal S (2004) Water resources: agricultural and environmental issues. Bioscience 54:909–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal S, Cregg BM (2019) Irrigating nursery crops with recycled run-off: a review on potential impact of pesticides on plant growth and physiology. HortTechnology 29:716–729

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal S, Fernandez RT, Owen J, Cregg B (2019) Dose-dependent phytotoxicity of pesticides in simulated nursery runoff on landscape nursery plants. Water 11:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Poudyal S, Owen JS Jr, Sharkey TD, Fernandez RT, Cregg B (2021) Phosphorus requirement for biomass accumulation is higher compared to photosynthetic biochemistry for three ornamental shrubs. SciHortic 275:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Razaq M, Zhang P, Shen H, Salahuddin (2017) Influence of nitrogen and phosphorous on the growth and root morphology of Acer mono. PloS One 12, 1-13

  • Reddy KR, Kadlec RH, Flaig E, Gale PM (1999) Phosphorus retention in streams and wetlands: a review. Crit Rev Environ SciTechnol 29:83–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ristvey AG, Belayneh BE, Lea-Cox JD (2019) A comparison of irrigation-water containment methods and management strategies between two ornamental production systems to minimize water security threats. Water 11:1–14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rodell M, Famigletti JS, Wiese DN, Reager JT, Beaudoing HK, Landerer FW, Lo MH (2018) Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature 557:651–659

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez-Blanco MJ, Ortuño MF, Bañon S, Álvarez S (2019) Deficit irrigation as a strategy to control growth in ornamental plants and enhance their ability to adapt to drought conditions. J HorticSci Biotech 94:137–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler DW, Carpenter SR, Chapra SC, Hecky RE, Orihel DM (2016) Reducing phosphorus to curb lake eutrophication is a success. Environ SciTechnol 50:8923–8929

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler HH, Warren SL, Bilderback TE (1996) Reduced leaching fractions improve irrigation use efficiency and nutrient efficiency. J Environ Hortic 14:199–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA National Primary Drinking Water Regulations https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations (Accessed 23 September 2020)

  • Van Iersel MW, Dove S, Kang JG, Burnett SE (2010) Growth and water use of petunia as affected by substrate water content and daily light integral. HortScience 45:277–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warsaw AL, Fernandez RT, Cregg BM, Andresen JA (2009a) Water conservation, growth, and water use efficiency of container-grown woody ornamentals irrigated based on daily water use. HortScience 44:1308–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warsaw AL, Fernandez RT, Cregg BM, Andresen JA (2009b) Container-grown ornamental plant growth and water runoff nutrient content and volume under four irrigation treatments. HortScience 44:1573–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White SA, Owen JS, Majsztrik JC, Oki LR, Fisher PR, Hall CR, Lea-Cox JD, Fernandez RT (2019) Greenhouse and nursery water management characterization and research priorities in the USA. Water 11:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeager T, Wright R, Fare D, Gilliam C, Johnson J, Bilderback T, Zondag R (1993) Six state survey of container nursery nitrate nitrogen runoff. J of Environ Hortic 11:206–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, U.S. Department of Agriculture through the SCRI Clean WateR3 Project, award number 2014-51181-22372, and Hatch project numbers MICL02473, MICL02403, VA-136312, FLA-SWS-005496, 1011745, and MSU Project GREEEN. The authors appreciate the material support from Spring Meadow Nursery (Grand Haven, MI), and Harrell’s Inc. (Lakeland, FL USA), as well as the operational support provided by Dan Kort, Shital Poudyal, Deborah Trelstad, Dana Ellison, Dr. John Lea-Cox, Dr. Bruk Belayneh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, 1066 Bogue St. Room A216, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA

    Damon E. Abdi, Bert M. Cregg & R. Thomas Fernandez

  2. Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech Agricultural Experiment Station, 1444 Diamond Springs Road, Virginia Beach, VA, 23455, USA

    James S. Owen Jr., Julie C. Brindley & Anna Birnbaum

  3. USDA ARS, 1680 Madison Ave., Wooster, OH, 44691, USA

    James S. Owen Jr.

  4. Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, University of Georgia, 1420 Experiment Station Rd., 30677, Watkinsville, GA, USA

    Anna Birnbaum

Authors
  1. Damon E. Abdi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. James S. Owen Jr.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Julie C. Brindley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Anna Birnbaum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bert M. Cregg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. R. Thomas Fernandez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Thomas Fernandez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdi, D.E., Owen, J.S., Brindley, J.C. et al. Irrigation return flow and nutrient movement mitigation by irrigation method for container plant production. Irrig Sci 39, 567–585 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-021-00727-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-021-00727-1

Search

Navigation