Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Effect of water supply on the water use-related physiological traits and yield of snap beans in dry seasons

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Four snap bean varieties (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) with different pod type were grown under three water supply conditions (well-irrigated, water deficit, non-irrigated) to examine the stomatal resistance, stomatal density and leaf area index (LAI) and their relationship with the yield. The highest stomatal resistance of the leaves and the smallest LAI and harvest index concerning the pods were measured under non-irrigated growing conditions. During flowering and pod development, significant differences were found in stomatal density on both leaf surfaces between the green-podded and yellow-podded varieties under water deficiency. Under non-irrigated conditions, stomatal resistance measured during flowering had a large effect mainly on the individual pod yield. Under these conditions, close significant correlations were found between stomatal resistance and LAI and water use (WUc) during the generative period of plants and the pod weight per plant. Under moderate water deficiency, the stomatal resistance, adaxial stomatal density of the leaves, and LAI were more effective to evaluate the difference in the productivity of snap bean genotypes than those measurements in severe drought. WUc-related traits can be used for the selection of bean genotypes adapted to drought, while the difference in water use efficiency (WUEy) between the snap bean varieties is suitable to evaluate their productivity under deficit irrigation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  • Aggarwal PK, Singh AK, Chaturvedi GS, Sinha SK (1986) Performance of wheat and triticale cultivars in a variable soil–water environment II. Evapotranspiration, water use efficiency, harvest index and grain yield. Field Crops Res 13:301–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage. Paper no. 56. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Boutraa T, Sanders FE (2001) Influence of water stress on grain yield and vegetative growth of two cultivars of bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Agron Crop Sci 187:251–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broughton WJ, Hernádez G, Balir M, Beebe S, Gepts P, Vanderleyden J (2003) Beans (Phaseolus spp.) model food legumes. Plant Soil 252:55–128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Çolak YB, Yazar A, Çolak I, Akça H, Duraktekin G (2015) Evaluation of crop water stress index (CWSI) for eggplant under varying irrigation regimes using surface and subsurface drip systems. Agric Agric Sci Proc 4:372–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies WJ, Zhang J (1991) Root signals and the regulation of growth and development of plants in drying soil. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 42:55–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang X, Turner NC, Yan G, Li F, Siddique KHM (2010) Flower numbers, pod production, pollen viability, and pistil function are reduced and flower and pod abortion increased in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under terminal drought. J Exp Bot 61:335–345. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/rp307

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ferdinand JA, Fredericksen TS, Kouterick KB, Skelly JM (2000) Leaf morphology and ozone sensitivity of two open pollinated genotypes of black cherry (Prunus serotina) seedlings. Environ Pollut 108:297–302

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E, Evans RG (2006) Irrigation of fruit trees and vines: an introduction. Irrig Sci 24:55–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foolad MR (2005) Breeding for abiotic stress tolerances in tomato. In: Ashraf M, Harris PJC (eds) Abiotic stresses: plant resistance through breeding and molecular approaches. Haworth Press Inc., New York, pp 613–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Foulkes MJ, Snape JW, Shearman VJ, Reynolds MP, Gaju O, Sylvester-Bradley R (2007) Genetic progress in yield potential in wheat: recent advances and future prospects. J Agric Sci 145:17–29

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gay AP, Hurd RG (1975) The influence of light on stomatal density in the tomato. New Phytol 75:37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good NE (1986) Confessions of a habitual skeptic. Ann Rev Plant Physiol 37:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardy JP, Anderson VJ, Gardner JS (1995) Stomatal characteristics, conductance ratios, and drought-induced leaf modifications of semiarid grassland species. Am J Bot 82:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamel HA, Abdelhamid MT, Dawood MG (2010) Distribution of 14 C into biochemical components of soybean exposed to water deficit and potassium. Commun Biom Crop Sci 5:27–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanemasu ET, Tanner CB (1969) Stomatal diffusion resistance of snap beans I. Influence of leaf-water potential. Plant Physiol 44:1547–1552

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Kirda C (2002) Deficit irrigation scheduling based on plant growth stages showing water stress tolerance. Deficit irrigation practice water report 22. FAO, Rome, pp 3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Köksal ES, Kara T, Apan M, Üstün H, Ilbeyi A (2008) Estimation of green bean yield, water deficiency and productivity using spectral indexes during the growing season. Irrig Drain Syst 22:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kozak M (2010) Use of parallel coordinate plots in multi-response selection of interesting genotypes. Commun Biom Crop Sci 5:83–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahoz I, Pérez-de-Castro A, Valcárcel M, Macua JI, Beltrán J, Roselló S, Cebolla-Cornejo J (2016) Effect of water deficit on the agronomical performance and quality of processing tomato. Sci Hortic 200:55–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovelli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Tomasso TD (2007) Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agric Water Manag 92:73–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loveys BR, Stoll M, Davies WJ (2004) Physiological approaches to enhance water use efficiency in agriculture: exploiting plant signaling in novel irrigation practice. In: Bacon MA (ed) Water use efficiency in plant biology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Victoria, pp 113–141

    Google Scholar 

  • M’hamed HC, Rezig M, Naceur MB (2015) Water use efficiency of durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf) under deficit irrigation. J Agr Sci 7:8:238–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Makbul S, Güler NS, Durmuş N, Güven S (2011) Changes in anatomical and physiological parameters of soybean under drought stress. Turk J Bot 35:369–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Medrano H, Tomás M, Martorell S, Flexas J, Hernandéz E, Rosselló J, Pou A, Escalona JM, Bota J (2015) From leaf to whole-plant water use efficiency (WUE) in complex canopies: limitations of leaf WUE as a selection target. Crop J 3:220–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meidner H, Mansfield TA (1969) Physiology of stomata. McGraw-Hill, New York-London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounce RB, O’Shaughnessy SA, Blaser BC, Colaizzi PD, Evet SR (2016) Crop response of drought-tolerant and conventional maize hybrids in a semiarid environment. Irrig Sci 34:231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeskéri E, Sárdi É, Kovács-Nagy E, Stefanovits-Bányai É, Nagy J, Nyéki J, Szabó T (2009) Studies on the drought responses of apple trees (Malus domestica Borkh.) grafted on different rootstocks. Int J Hortic Sci Hung 15:29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemeskéri E, Sárdi É, Remenyik J, Kőszegi B, Nagy P (2010) Study of defensive mechanism against drought in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) varieties. Acta Physiol Plant 32:1125–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeskéri E, Kovács-Nagy E, Nyéki J, Sárdi É (2015a) Responses of apple tree cultivars to drought: carbohydrate composition in the leaves. Turk J Agric For 39:949–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemeskéri E, Molnár K, Víg R, Nagy J, Dobos A (2015b) Relationships between stomatal behaviour, spectral traits and water use and productivity of green peas (Pisum sativum L.) in dry seasons. Acta Physiol Plant 37:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen DC, Nelson NO (1998) Black bean sensitivity to water stress at various growth stages. Crop Sci 38:422–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Passioura J (2004) Water use efficiency in the farmers’ fields. In: Bacon MA (ed) Water use efficiency in plant biology. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Victoria, pp 302–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Pires RCM, Furlani PR, Ribeiro RV, Junior DB, Sakai E, Lourenção AL, Neto AT (2011) Irrigation frequency and substrate volume effects in the growth and yield of tomato plants under greenhouse conditions. (Piracicaba, Braz.). Sci Agric 68:400–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Saab IN, Sharp RE, Pritchard J, Voetbertg GS (1990) Increased endogenous abscisic acid maintains primary root growth and inhibits shoot growth of maize seedlings at low water potentials. Plant Physiol 93:1329–1336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez FJ, Manzanares M, Andrés EF, Tenorio JL, Ayerbe L (2001) Residual transpiration rate, epicuticular wax load and leaf colour of pea plants in drought conditions. Influence on harvest index and canopy temperature. Eur J Agron 15:57–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter A, Dietz KJ, Hartung W (2002) A possible stress physiological role of abscisic acid conjugates in root-to-shoot signalling. Plant Cell Environ 25:223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scully BT, Wallace DH, Viands DR (1991) Heritability and correlation of biomass, growth rates, harvest index, and phenology to the yield of common beans. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:127–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Sezen SM, Yazar A, Akyildiz A, Dasgan HY, Gencel B (2008) Yield and quality response of drip irrigated green beans under full and deficit irrigation. Sci Hortic 117:95–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shao HB, Chu LY, Abdul-Jaleel C, Zhao CX (2008) Water deficit stress induced anatomical changes in higher plants. C R Biol 331:215–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shuttleworth JW, Wallace JS (1985) Evaporation from sparse crops—an energy combination theory. Q J R Meteorol Soc 3:839–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silva LL, Duarte I, Lourenço E, Simões N, Chaves MM (2014) Yield and water productivity of five chickpea varieties under supplemental irrigation in contrasting years. Irrig Sci 32:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Reddy KR (2011) Regulation of photosynthesis, fluorescence, stomatal conductance and water-use efficiency of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) under drought. J Photochem Photobiol B Biol 105:40–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tangolar S, Tangolar S, Topçu S (2015) Effects of different bud loads and irrigations applied at different leaf water potential levels on Kalecik Karasi grape variety. Turk J Agric For 39:887–897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakrim R, Wahbi S, Tahi H, Aganchich B, Serraj R (2005) Comparative effects of partial root drying (PRD) and regulated deficit irrigation (RDI) on water relations and water use efficiency in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Agric Ecosyst Environ 106:275–287

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace JS (2000) Increasing agricultural water use efficiency to meet future food production. Agric Ecosyst Environ 82:105–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber HA, Cadramootoo CA, Bourgault M, Horst MG, Stulina G, Smith DL (2006) Water use efficiency of common bean and green gram grown using alternate furrow and deficit irrigation. Agr Water Manag 86:259–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams LE, Grimes DW, Phene CJ (2010) The effects of applied water at various fractions of measured evapotranspiration on water relations and vegetative growth of Thompson Seedless grapevines. Irrig Sci 28:221–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wnuk A, Górny AG, Bocianowski J, Kozak M (2013) Visualizing harvest index in crops. Commun Biom Crop Sci 8:48–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z, Zhou G (2008) Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a grass. J Exp Bot 59:3317–3325

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HM, Zhang XY, Wang GX (2004) Relationships between stomatal character, photosynthetic character and seed chemical composition in grass pea at different water availabilities. J Agric Sci 142:675–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young LW, Wilen RW, Bonham-Smith PC (2004) High temperature stress of Brassica napus during flowering reduces micro- and megagametophyte fertility, induces fruit abortion, and disrupts seed production. J Exp Bot 55:485–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zokaee-Khosroshahi M, Esna-Ashari M, Ershadi A, Imami A (2014) Morphological changes in response to drought stress in cultivated and wild almond species. Int J Hortic Sci Technol 1:79–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This publication was supported by a grant from the National Technology Program of Hungary (NKTH no. 00210/2008) and the FP7-REGPOT-2010-1 UD_AGR_REPO University of Debrecen REGPOT Capacities Project. The publication was supported by the EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00008 project. The project is co-financed by the European Union and the European Social Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Institute of Horticulture, Szent István University, 1 Páter Károly street, Gödöllő, 2100, Hungary

    Eszter Nemeskéri, Zoltán Pék & Lajos Helyes

  2. Centre for Agricultural Sciences, Agrometeorological and Agroecological Monitoring Centre, University of Debrecen, 138 Böszörményi street, Debrecen, 4032, Hungary

    Krisztina Molnár

Authors
  1. Eszter Nemeskéri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Krisztina Molnár
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zoltán Pék
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Lajos Helyes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eszter Nemeskéri.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Fereres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nemeskéri, E., Molnár, K., Pék, Z. et al. Effect of water supply on the water use-related physiological traits and yield of snap beans in dry seasons. Irrig Sci 36, 143–158 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0571-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-018-0571-2

Search

Navigation