Skip to main content
Log in

Using an integrated crop water stress index for irrigation scheduling of two corn hybrids in a semi-arid region

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Different thermal-based plant feedback systems have been used for irrigation management of cotton and grain crops in the Texas High Plains region, producing yields that are similar or better than irrigation scheduling using the neutron probe. However, there are limited studies using plant feedback systems to actively scheduling irrigations for corn. In this 2-year study, a drought tolerant and a conventional hybrid were managed under a variable rate center pivot irrigation system. The main treatments were manual and plant feedback irrigation scheduling based on weekly neutron probe readings and an integrated crop water stress index (CWSI), respectively. In each main treatment, three irrigation treatment levels were established. Crop responses were compared between irrigation methods and levels. Results demonstrated that overall grain and biomass yields and grain WUE for the plant feedback-control plots were similar to those from the manual-control plots for both years. These results indicate that a plant feedback system using a CWSI could be used to manage corn in a semi-arid region and over a large-sized field. The plant feedback system could provide convenience and time savings to farmers who manage multiple center pivot fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The mention of trade names, commercial products or companies in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

References

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith D (1998) Crop evapotranspiration-Guidelines for computing crop water requirements-FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Rome

  • ASCE (2005) The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. Report by the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Task Committee on Standardization of Reference Evapotranspiration. In: Allen RG, Walter IA, Elliot RI, Howell TA, Henfisu D, Jensen ME, Snyder RL (eds) ADCE, Reston

  • Ben-Gal A, Agam N, Alchanatis V, Cohen Y, Yermiyahu U, Zipori I, Presnov E, Sprintsin M, Arnon Dag (2009) Evaluating water stress in irrigated olives: correlation of soil water status, tree water status, and thermal imagery. Irrig Sci 27:367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borrás L, Westgate ME, Otegui ME (2003) Control of kernel weight and kernel water relations by post-flowering source-sink ration in maize. Ann Bot 91:857–867

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Burke JJ, Mahan JR, Hatfield JL (1988) Crop specific thermal kinetic windows in relation to wheat and cotton biomass production. Agron J 80:553–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cakir R (2004) Effect of water stress at different development stages on vegetative and reproductive growth of corn. Field Crops Res 89:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claassen MM, Shaw RH (1970) Water deficit effects on corn II. Grain components. Agron J 62:652–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colaizzi PD, Barnes EM, Clarke TR, Choi CY, Waller PM, Haberland J, Kostrzewski M (2003a) Water stress detection under high frequency sprinkler irrigation with water deficit index. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(1):36–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colaizzi PD, Barnes EM, Clarke TR, Choi CY, Waller PM (2003b) Estimating soil moisture under low-frequency surface irrigation using crop water stress index. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(1):27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colaizzi PD, Evett SR, Agam N, Schwartz RC, Kustas WP, Cosh MH, McKee L (2016) Soil heat flux calculation for sunlit and shaded surfaces under row crops: 2. Model test. Agric For Meteorol 216:129–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeJonge KC, Taghvaeian S, Trout TT, Comas LH (2015) Comparison of canopy temperature-based water stress indices for maize. Agric Water Manag 156:51–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeLoughery RL, Crookston RK (1979) Harvest index of corn affected by population density, maturity rating, and environment. Agron J 71(4):577–580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Echarte L, Andrade LH (2003) Harvest index stability of Argentinean maize hybrids released between 1965 and 1993. Field Crops Res 82:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evett SR (2003) Measuring soil water by neutron thermalization. In: Stewart BA, Howell TA (eds) Encyclopedia of water science. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York, pp 889–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Evett SR (2008) Chapter 3: Neutron moisture meters. In: Evett SR, Heng LK, Moutonnet P, Nguyen ML (eds) Field estimation of soil water content: a practical guide to methods, instrumentation, and sensor technology. AEA-TCS-30. International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, pp 39–54. http://www-pub.iaea.org/books/iaeabooks/7978/Field-Estimation-of-Soil-Water-Content

  • Evett SR, Howell TA, Schneider AD, Upchurch DR, Wanjura DF (1996) Canopy temperature based automatic irrigation control. In: Camp CR, Sadler EJ, Yoder RE (eds) Proceedings international conference evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, St. Joseph, Mich, pp 207–213

  • Hall AJ, Richards RA (2013) Prognosis for genetic improvement of yield potential and water-limited yield of major crops. Field Crops Res 143:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall AJ, Vicella F, Trapani N, Chimenti C (1982) The effects of water stress and genotype on the dynamics of pollen-shedding and silking in maize. Field Crop Res 5:349–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao B, Xue Q, Marek TH, Jessup KE, Becker J, Hou X, Xu W, Bynum ED, Bean BW, Colaizzi PD, Howell TA (2015) Water use and grain yield in drought-tolerant corn in the Texas High Plains. Agron J 107(5):1922–1930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell TA (2001) Enhancing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. Agron J 93(2):281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell TA, Copeland KS, Schneider AD, Dusek DA (1989) Sprinkler irrigation management for corn—southern great plains. Trans ASAE 32(1):147–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell TA, Tolk JA, Schneider AD, Evett SR (1998) Evapotranspiration, yield, and water use efficiency of corn hybrids differing in maturity. Agron J 90(1):3–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell TA, Schneider AD, Dusek DA (2002) Effects of furrow diking on corn response to limited and full sprinkler irrigation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 66:222–227

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC, Acevedo E (1974) Plant responses to water deficits, water-use efficiency, and drought resistance. Agric Meteorol 14:59–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hugh E, Hugh J, Richard F (2003) Effect of drought stress on leaf and whole canopy radiation use efficiency and yield of maize. Agron J 95(3):688–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humes KS, Kustas WP, Moran MS, Nichols WD, Weltz MA (1994) Variability of emissivity and surface temperature over a sparsely vegetated surface. Water Res Res 30(5):1299–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Haman DZ, Bastug R (2000) determination of crop water stress index for irrigation timing and yield estimation of corn. Agron J 92:1221–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD (1982) Canopy temperature and crop water stress. In: Hillel D (ed) Advances in irrigation, vol 1. Academic, New York, pp 43–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD, Idso SB, Reginato RJ, Pinter PJ Jr (1981) Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator. Water Resour Res 17(4):1133–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD, Kustas WP, Choudhury BJ (1988) A reexamination of the crop water stress index. Irrig Sci 9:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocke NL, Currie RS, Tomsicek DJ, Koehn J (2011) Corn yield response to deficit irrigation. Trans ASABE 54(3):931–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klocke NL, Currie RS, Kisekka I, Stone LR (2014) Corn and grain sorghum response to limited irrigation, drought, and hail. Appl Eng Agric 30(6):915–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) Multi-factor treatment designs with multiple error terms in SAS for Mixed models. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina

    Google Scholar 

  • Mounce RB, O’Shaughnessy SA, Blaser BC, Colaizzi PD, Evett SR (2016) Crop response of drought-tolerant and conventional maize hybrids in a semiarid environment. Irrig Sci 34(3):231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy SA, Evett SR (2010) Canopy temperature based system effectively schedules and controls center pivot irrigation for cotton. Agric Water Manag 97:1310–1316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy SA, Hebel MA, Evett SR, Colaizzi PD (2011) Evaluation of a wireless infrared thermometer with a narrow field of view. Comput Electron Agric 76:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy SA, Evett S, Colaizzi P, Howell TA (2012a) Grain sorghum response to irrigation scheduling with the time-temperature threshold method and deficit irrigation levels. Trans ASABE 55(2):451–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy SA, Evett SR, Colaizzi PD, Howell TA (2012b) A crop water stress index and time threshold for automatic irrigation scheduling of grain sorghum. Agric Water Manag 107:122–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy SA, Urrego YF, Evett SR, Colaizzi PD, Howell TA (2013) Assessing application uniformity of a variable rate irrigation system in a windy location. Appl Eng Agric 29(4):497–510

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy SA, Evett SR, Colaizzi PD, Tolk JA, Howell TA (2014) Early and late maturing grain sorghum under variable climatic conditions in the Texas High Plains. Trans ASABE 57(6):1583–1594

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Shaughnessy SA, Evett SR, Colaizzi PD (2015) Dynamic prescription maps for site-specific variable rate irrigation of cotton. Agric Water Manag 159:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osroosh Y, Peters RT, Campbell CS, Zhang Q (2015) Automatic irrigation scheduling of apple trees using theoretical crop water stress index with an innovative dynamic threshold. Comput Electron Agric 118:193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osroosh Y, Peters RT, Campbell CS (2016) Daylight crop water stress index for continuous monitoring of water status in apple trees. Irrig Sci 34(3):209–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RT, Evett SR (2004) Modeling diurnal canopy temperature dynamics using one-time-of-day measurements and a reference temperature curve. Agron J 96(6):1553–1561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters RT, Evett SR (2008) Automation of a center pivot using the temperature-time-threshold method of irrigation scheduling. J Irrig Drain Eng 134(3):286–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Faunt CC, Longuevergne L, Reddy RC, Alley WM, McGuire VL, McMahon PB (2012) Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. In: Proc Natl. Acad Sci USA, pp 9320–9932

  • Sinclair TR (1998) Historical changes in harvest index and crop nitrogen accumulation. Crop Sci 38(3):638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soil Survey Staff (2004) National soil survey characterization data. Soil Survey Laboratory, National Soil Survey Center, USDA-NRCS - Lincoln, NE

  • Taghvaeian S, Chávez JL, Hansen NC (2012) Infrared thermometry to estimate crop water stress index and water use of irrigated maize in northeastern Colorado. Remote Sens 4:3619–3637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolk JA, Evett SR, Schwartz RC (2015) Field-measured, hourly soil water evaporation stages in relation to reference evapotranspiration rate and soil to air temperature ratio. Vadose Zone J. doi:10.2136/vzj2014.07.0079

    Google Scholar 

  • Unkovich M, Baldock J, Forbes M (2010) Chapter 5—variability in harvest index of grain crops and potential significance for carbon accounting: examples from Australian agriculture. Adv Agron 105:173–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Upchurch DR, Wanjura DF, Burke JJ, Mahan JR (1996) Biologically identified optimal temperature interactive console (BIOTIC) for managing irrigation. U.S. patent No. 5,539,637

  • USDA ERS (2016) http://www.ers.usda.gov/topics/crops/corn.aspx. Accessed 29 July 2016

  • USDA NASS (2016) https://quickstats.nass.usda.gov/. Accessed 29 July 2016

  • Wanjura DF, Upchurch DR, Mahan JR (1992) Automated irrigation based on threshold canopy temperature. Trans ASABE 35(1):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanjura DF, Upchurch DR, Mahan JR (1995) Control of irrigation scheduling using temperature-time thresholds. Trans ASAE 38(2):403–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wanjura DF, Upchurch DR, Mahan JR (2004) Establishing differential irrigation levels using temperature-time thresholds. Appl Eng Agric 20(2):201–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazar A, Howell TA, Dusek DA, Copeland KS (1999) Evaluation of crop water stress index for LEPA irrigated corn. Irrig Sci 18:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge CRADA (58-3K95-0-1455-M) with Valmont Industries, Inc. Valley Nebraska, the expertise of Mr. Luke Britten, Agricultural Research Technician, USDA-ARS, Bushland, TX and funding form the Ogallala Aquifer Program, a consortium between USDA-Agricultural Research Service, Kansas State University, Texas AgriLife Extension Service & Research, Texas Tech University, and West Texas A&M University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susan A. O’Shaughnessy.

Additional information

Communicated by E. Fereres.

Disclaimer

The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program (not all prohibited bases apply to all programs). Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Shaughnessy, S.A., Andrade, M.A. & Evett, S.R. Using an integrated crop water stress index for irrigation scheduling of two corn hybrids in a semi-arid region. Irrig Sci 35, 451–467 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-017-0552-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-017-0552-x

Navigation