Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Early morning fluctuations in trunk diameter are highly sensitive to water stress in nectarine trees

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The sensitivity to water stress of different plant water status indicators was evaluated during two consecutive years in early nectarine trees grown in a semi-arid region. Measurements were made post-harvest and two irrigation treatments were applied: a control treatment (CTL), irrigated at 120 % of crop evapotranspiration demand to achieve non-limiting water conditions, and a deficit irrigation treatment, that applied around 37 % less water than CTL during late postharvest. The plant water status indicators evaluated were midday stem water potential (Ψ stem) and indices derived from trunk diameter fluctuations: maximum daily shrinkage (MDS), trunk daily growth rate, early daily shrinkage measured between 0900 and 1200 hours solar time (EDS), and late daily shrinkage that occurred between 1200 hours solar time and the moment that minimum trunk diameter was reached (typically 1600 hours solar time). The most sensitive [highest ratio of signal intensity (SI) to noise] indices to water stress were Ψ stem and EDS. The SI of EDS was greater than that of Ψ stem, although with greater variability. EDS was a better index than MDS, with higher SI and similar variability. Although MDS was linearly related to Ψ stem down to −1.5 MPa, it decreased thereafter with increasing water stress. In contrast, EDS was linearly related to Ψ stem, although the slope of the regression decreased as the season progressed, as in the case of MDS. Further studies are needed to determine whether EDS is a sensitive index of water stress in a range of species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelfatah A, Aranda X, Savé R, de Herralde F, Biel C (2013) Evaluation of the response of maximum daily shrinkage in young cherry trees submitted to water stress cycles in a greenhouse. Agric Water Manag 118:150–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56 FAO, Rome

  • Angelopoulos K, Dichio B, Xiloyannis C (1996) Inhibition of photosynthesis in olive trees (Olea europaea L.) during water stress and rewatering. J Exp Bot 47:1093–1100

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Badal E, Buesa I, Guerra D, Bonet L, Ferrer P, Intrigliolo DS (2010) Maximum diurnal trunk shrinkage is a sensitive indicator of plant water, stress in Diospyros kaki (Persimmon) trees. Agric Water Manag 98:143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osório ML, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C (2002) How plants cope with water stress in the field. Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot 89:907–916

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conejero W, Alarcón JJ, García-Orellana Y, Abrisqueta JM, Torrecillas A (2007a) Daily sap flow and maximum daily trunk shrinkage measurements for diagnosing water stress in early maturing peach trees during the post-harvest period. Tree Physiol 27:81–88

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conejero W, Alarcón JJ, Garcia-Orellana Y, Nicolás E, Torrecillas A (2007b) Evaluation of sap flow and trunk diameter sensors for irrigation scheduling in early maturing. Tree Physiol 27:1753–1759

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conejero W, Ortuño MF, Mellisho CD, Torrecillas A (2010) Influence of crop load on maximum daily trunk shrinkage reference equations for irrigation scheduling of early maturing peach trees. Agric Water Manag 97:333–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Rosa JM, Conesa MR, Domingo R, Torres R, Pérez-Pastor A (2013) Feasibility of using trunk diameter fluctuation and stem water potential reference lines for irrigation scheduling of early nectarine trees. Agric Water Manag 126:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Rosa JM, Conesa MR, Domingo R, Pérez-Pastor A (2014) A new approach to ascertain the sensitivity to water stress of different plant water indicators in extra-early nectarine trees. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 169:147–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De la Rosa JM, Domingo R, Gómez-Montiel J, Pérez-Pastor A (2015) Implementing deficit irrigation scheduling through plant water stress indicators in early nectarine trees. Agric Water Manag 152:207–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egea G, Pagán E, Baille A, Domingo R, Nortes PA, Pérez-Pastor A (2009) Usefulness of establishing trunk diameter based reference lines for irrigation scheduling in almond trees. Irrig Sci 27:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egea G, Dodd IC, González-Real MM, Domingo R, Baille A (2011) Partial rootzone drying improves almond tree leaf-level water use efficiency and afternoon water status compared to regulated deficit irrigation. Funct Plant Biol 38:372–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E, Goldhamer DA (1990) Deciduous fruit and nut trees. In: Stewart BA, Nielsen DR (eds) Irrigation of agricultural crops. A.S.A. monograph 30. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 987–1017

    Google Scholar 

  • Fereres E, Goldhamer DA (2003) Suitability of stem diameter variations and water potential as indicators for irrigation scheduling of almond trees. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 78:139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández JE, Cuevas MV (2010) Irrigation scheduling from stem diameter variations: a review. Agric For Meteorol 150:135–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galindo A, Rodríguez P, Mellisho CD, Torrecillas E, Moriana A, Cruz ZN, Conejero W, Moreno F, Torrecillas A (2013) Assessment of discretely measured indicators and maximum daily trunk shrinkage for detecting water stress in pomegranate trees. Agric For Meteorol 180:58–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Orellana Y, Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Alarcón JJ, Conejero W, Ortuño MF, Nicolás E, Torrecillas A (2007) Preliminary assessment of the feasibility of using maximum daily trunk shrinkage for irrigation scheduling in lemon trees. Agric Water Manag 89:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gènard M, Fishman S, Vercambre G, Huguet JG, Bussi C, Besset J, Habib R (2001) A biophysical analysis of stem and root diameter variation in woody plants. Plant Physiol 126:188–202

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Fereres E (2001) Irrigation scheduling protocols using continuously recorded trunk diameter measurements. Irrig Sci 20:115–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Fereres E (2004) Irrigation scheduling of almond trees with trunk diameter sensors. Irrig Sci 23:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldhamer DA, Fereres E, Mata M, Girona J, Cohen M (1999) Sensitivity of continuous and discrete plant and soil water status monitoring in peach trees subjected to deficit irrigation. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 124:437–444

    Google Scholar 

  • Granier A (1987) Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol 3(4):309–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henson IE, Mahalakshmi V, Bidinger R, Alagarswamy G (1982) Osmotic adjustment to water stress in pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum [L.] Leeke) under field conditions. Plant Cell Environ 5:147–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinckley TM, Bruckerhoff DN (1975) The effects of drought on water relations and stem shrinkage of Quercus alba. Can J Bot 53:62–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao TC (1990) Measurements of plant water status. In: Steward BA, Nielsen DR (eds) Irrigation of agricultural crops. Agronomy monograph no. 30. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 243–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughet JG, Li SH, Lorendeau JY, Pelloux G (1992) Specific micromorphometric reactions of fruit trees to water stress and irrigation scheduling automatization. J Hortic Sci 67:631–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2004) Continuous measurement of plant and soil water status for irrigation scheduling in plum. Irrig Sci 23(2):93–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2006) Usefulness of diurnal trunk shrinkage as a water stress indicator in plum trees. Tree Physiol 26:303–311

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2007) Evaluation of grapevine water status from trunk diameter variations. Irrig Sci 26:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Intrigliolo DS, Puerto H, Bonet L, Alarcón JJ, Nicolas E, Bartual J (2011) Usefulness of trunk diameter variations as continuous water stress indicators of pomegranate (Punica granatum) trees. Agric Water Manag 98:1462–1468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones HG (2004) Irrigation scheduling: advantages and pitfalls of plant-based methods. J Exp Bot 55:2427–2436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowsky TT (1976) Shrinking and swelling of plant tissues. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Water deficits and plant growth, vol 3. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozlowsky TT, Winget CH (1964) Diurnal and seasonal variation in radio of tree stems. Ecology 45:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsal J, Gelly M, Mata M, Rabones J, Rufat J, Girona J (2002) Phenology and drought affects the relationship between daily trunk shrinkage and midday stem water potential of peach trees. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 77:411–417

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchan H, Shackel KA (1992) Stem water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117:607–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriana A, Fereres E (2002) Plant indicators for scheduling irrigation of young olive trees. Irrig Sci 21:83–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriana A, Fereres E (2004) Establishing reference values of trunk diameter fluctuations and stem water potential for irrigation scheduling of olive trees. Acta Hortic 664:407–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriana A, Moreno F, Girón I, Conejero W, Ortuño MF, Morales D, Corell M, Torrecillas A (2011) Seasonal changes of maximum daily shrinkage reference equations for irrigation scheduling in olive trees: influence of fruit load. Agric Water Manag 99:121–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naor A (2006) Irrigation scheduling and evaluation of tree water status in deciduous orchards. Hortic Rev 32:111–165

    Google Scholar 

  • Naor A, Cohen S (2003) The sensitivity and variability of maximum trunk shrinkage, midday stem water potential, and transpiration rate in response to withholding of irrigation in field-grown trees. Hortsci 38:547–551

    Google Scholar 

  • Naor A, Gal Y, Peres M (2006) The inherent variability of water stress indicators in apple, nectarine and pear orchards, and the validity of a leaf-selection procedure for water potential measurements. Irrig Sci 24:129–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nortes PA, Pérez-Pastor A, Egea G, Conejero W, Domingo R (2005) Comparison of changes in stem diameter and water potential values for detecting water stress in young almond trees. Agric Water Manag 77(1–3):296–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño MF, García-Orellana Y, Conejero W, Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Alarcón JJ, Torrecillas A (2006) Stem and leaf water potentials, gas exchange, sap flow, and trunk diameter fluctuations for detecting water stress in lemon trees. Trees 20:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño MF, Brito JJ, Conejero W, García-Orellana Y, Torrecillas A (2009) Using continuously recorded trunk diameter fluctuations for estimating water requirements of lemon trees. Irrig Sci 27:271–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortuño MF, Conejero W, Moreno F, Moriana A, Intrigliolo DS, Biel C, Mellisho CD, Pérez-Pastor A, Domingo R, Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Casadesus J, Bonany J, Torrecillas A (2010) Could trunk diameter sensors be used in woody crops for irrigation scheduling? A review of current knowledge and future perspectives. Agric Water Manag 97:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pagán E, Pérez-Pastor A, Domingo R, Conesa MR, Caro M (2012) Suitability of trunk diameter reference lines for irrigation scheduling with saline water in late mandarin trees with different crop load. Agric Water Manag 111:11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Pastor A, Pagán E, Domingo R (2009). The usefulness of the maximum daily trunk shrinkage to schedule deficit irrigation in almond trees. In: Interdrought III. The 3nd international conference on integrated approaches to sustain and improve plant production under drought stress, Shanghai, China

  • Puerto P, Domingo R, Torres R, Pérez-Pastor A, García-Riquelme M (2013) Remote management of deficit irrigation in almond trees based on maximum daily trunk shrinkage. Water relations and yield. Agric Water Manag 126:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remorini D, Massai R (2003) Comparison of water status indicators for young peach trees. Irrig Sci 22:39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero P, Dodd IC, Martinez-Cutillas A (2012) Contrasting physiological effects of partial root-zone drying in field-grown grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Monastrell) according to total soil water availability. J Exp Bot 63:4071–4083

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Domingo R, Pérez-Pastor A (2007) Daily variations in water relations of apricot trees under different irrigation regimes. Biol Plant 51:735–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackel KA, Ahmadi H, Biasi W, Buchner R, Goldhamer DA, Gurusinghe SH, Hasey J, Kester D, Krueger B, Lampinen B, McGourty G, Micke W, Mitcham E, Olson B, Pelletrau K, Philips H, Ramos D, Schwankl LJ, Sibbet S, Snyder R, Southwick S, Stevenson M, Thorpe M, Weinbaum S, Yeager J (1997) Plant water status as an index of irrigation need in deciduous fruit trees. HortTechnology 7:23–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Velez JE, Intrigliolo DS, Castel JR (2007) Scheduling deficit irrigation of citrus trees with maximum daily trunk shrinkage. Agric Water Manag 90:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel R, Item H, Hasler R (2000) Stem radius changes and their relation to stored water in stems of young Norway spruce trees. Trees Struct Funct 15:50–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science of Innovation (AGL2010-19201-C04-04), European project SIRRIMED (FP7-KBBE-2009-3-245159) and also by the Regional Science Agency of Murcia Region (08845/PI/08). We thank E. Fereres for editorial comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dpto. Producción Vegetal, ETSIA, Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena (UPCT), Paseo Alfonso XIII, 52, 30203, Cartagena, Spain

    J. M. De la Rosa, R. Domingo & A. Pérez-Pastor

  2. The Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, Lancaster, LA1 4YQ, UK

    I. C. Dodd

Authors
  1. J. M. De la Rosa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. I. C. Dodd
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. R. Domingo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. A. Pérez-Pastor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Pérez-Pastor.

Additional information

Communicated by D. Intrigliolo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

De la Rosa, J.M., Dodd, I.C., Domingo, R. et al. Early morning fluctuations in trunk diameter are highly sensitive to water stress in nectarine trees. Irrig Sci 34, 117–128 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-016-0491-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-016-0491-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation