Abstract
Rice is a crop that is usually grown under flooded conditions and can require large amounts of water. The objective of this 3-year study was to quantify water use in water- (WS) and dry-seeded (DS) systems. In WS systems, the field is continuously flooded, while in DS systems the field is flush irrigated for the first month and then flooded. Research was conducted on commercial rice fields where the residual of the energy balance method using a sonic anemometer and the eddy covariance method were used to determine crop evapotranspiration (ETc) and crop coefficient (K c) values. In addition, inlet irrigation water and tailwater drainage were determined. Across years, there was no difference in ETc (averaged 862 mm), seasonal K c (averaged 1.07), irrigation water delivery (averaged 1839 mm) and calculated percolation and seepage losses (averaged 269 mm) between systems. An analysis of the first month of the season, when the water management between these two practices was different, indicated that K c and water use were lower in DS systems relative to WS systems when there was only one irrigation flush during this period, while two or three irrigation flushes resulted in similar values between the two systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alberto MCR, Wassman R, Hirano T, Miyata A, Hatano R, Kumar A, Padre A, Amante M (2011) Comparisons of energy balance and evapotranspiration between flooded and aerobic rice fields in the Philippines. Agric Water Manag 98:1417–1430
Allen RG, Walter IA, Elliott RL, Howell TA, Itenfisu D, Jensen ME, Snyder RL (2005) The ASCE standardized reference evapotranspiration equation. American Society of Civil Engineering, Reston
Allen RG, Pruitt WO, Wright JL, Howell TA, Ventura F, Snyder R, Itenfisu D, Steduto P, Berengena J, Baselga Yrisarry J, Smith M, Pereira LS, Raes D, Perrier A, Alves I, Walter I, Elliott RA (2006) A recommendation on standardized surface resistance for hourly calculation of reference ETo by the FAO56 Penman–Monteith method. Agric Water Manag 81:1–22
Board JE, Peterson ML, Ng E (1980) Floret sterility in rice in a cool environment. Agron J 72:483–487
California Irrigation Management Information System (CIMIS) (2015) http://www.cimis.water.ca.gov/. Last accessed July 20, 2015
Castellví F, Martínez-Cob A, Pérez-Coveta O (2006) Estimating sensible and latent heat fluxes over rice using surface renewal. Agric For Meteorol 139:164–169
Castellví F, Snyder RL, Baldocchi D (2008) Surface energy-balance closure over rangeland grass using the eddy covariance method and surface renewal analysis. Agric For Meteorol 148:1147–1160
Elliot J, Deryng D, Muller C et al (2014) Constraints and potential of future irrigation water availability on agricultural production under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3245–3250
Haddeland I, Heinke J, Biemans H et al (2014) Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3251–3256
Hart QJ, Brugnach M, Temesgen B, Rueda C, Ustin SL, Frame K (2009) Daily reference evapotranspiration for California using satellite imagery and weather station measurement interpolation. Civ Eng Environ Syst 26:19–33
Hill JE, Williams JF, Mutters RG, Greer CA (2006) The California rice cropping system: agronomic and natural resource issues for long-term sustainability. Paddy Water Environ 4:13–19
Hossen S, Mano M, Miyata A, Baten A, Hiyama T (2012) Surface energy partitioning and evapotranspiration over a double-cropping paddy field in Bangladesh. Hydrol Process 26:1311–1320
Jodari F, Johnson CW, Lage J, Andaya VC, Oster JJ, McKenzie KS, Hill JE, Espino LA, Greer CA, Mutters RG, Wennig RL (2012) Characteristic of public California rice varieties. http://cecolusa.ucdavis.edu/files/134743.pdf
Lee X, Massman WJ, Law BE (eds) (2004) Handbook of micrometeorology: a guide for surface flux measurement and analysis. Kluwer Academic, London
Liang XQ, Harter T, Porta L, van Kessel C, Linquist B (2014) Nitrate leaching in Californian rice fields: a field and regional scale assessment. J Environ Qual 43:881–894
Lourence FJ, Pruitt WO (1971) Energy balance and water use of rice grown in the central valley of California. Agron J 63:827–832
Maclean JL, Dawe DC, Hardy B, Hettel GP (eds) (2002). Rice Almanac. Los Banos (Philippines): International Rice Research Institute, Bouake (Cote d’Ivoire): West Africa Rice Development Association, Cali (Colombia): International Center for Tropical Agriculture, Rome (Italy): Food and Agriculture Organization
Paw UKT, Snyder RL, Spano D, Su HB (2005) Surface renewal estimates of scalar exchange. In: Hatfield JL, Baker JM (eds) Micrometeorology in agricultural systems. ASA monograph no. 47, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 455–483. ISBN: 0-89118-158-X
Pittelkow CM, Fischer AJ, Moechnig MJ, Hill JE, Koffler KB, Mutters RG, Greer CA, Cho YS, van Kessel C, Linquist BA (2012) Agronomic productivity and nitrogen requirements of alternative tillage and crop establishment systems for improved weed control in direct-seeded rice. Field Crops Res 130:128–137
Sanchez PA (1973) Puddling tropical soils: 2. Effects of water loss. Soil Sci 115:303–308
Scardaci SC, Shannon MC, Grattan SR, Eke UA, Roberts SR, Goldman-Smith S, Hill JE (2002) Water management practices can affect salinity in rice fields. Calif Agric 56:184–188
Schewe J, Heinke J, Gerten D et al (2014) Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:3245–3250
Scott VH, Houston CEW (1959) Measuring irrigation water. University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences. Circular 473. http://babel.hathitrust.org/cgi/pt?id=uc2.ark:/13960/t10p27m53
Shah SB, Edling RJ (2000) Daily evapotranspiration prediction from Louisiana flooded rice field. J Irrig Drain Eng 126:8–13
Shapland TM, McElrone AJ, Paw UKT, Snyder RL (2013) A turnkey data logger program for field-scale energy flux density measurements using eddy covariance and surface renewal. Ital J Agrometeorol 18:5–16
Shaw RH, Snyder RL (2003) Evaporation and eddy covariance. In: Stewart BA, Howell T (eds) Encyclopedia of water science. Marcel Dekker, New York. doi:10.1081/E-EWS120010306
Smith MC, Massey JH, Branson J, Epting JW, Pennington D, Tacker PL, Thomas J, Vories ED, Wilson C (2007) Water use estimates for various rice production systems in Mississippi and Arkansas. Irrig Sci 25:141–147
Stoy PC, Mauder M, Foken T, Marcolla B, Boegh E, Ibrom A, Altaf Arain M, Arneth A, Aurela M, Bernhofer C, Cescatti A, Dellwik E, Duce P, Gianelle D, van Gorsel E, Kiely G, Knohl A, Margolis H, McCaughey H, Merbold M, Montagnani L, Papale D, Reichstein M, Saunders M, Serrano-Ortiz P, Sottocornola M, Spano D, Vaccari F, Varlagin A (2013) A data-driven analysis of energy balance closure across FLUXNET research sites: the role of landscape scale heterogeneity. Agric For Meteorol 171–172:137–152
Street JE, Bollich PK (2003) Rice production. In: Smith CW, Dilday RH (eds) Rice: origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley, Hoboken
Tomar VS, O’Toole JC (1980) Water use in lowland rice cultivation in Asia: a review of evapotranspiration. Agric Water Manag 3:83–106
Unites States Department of Agriculture (USDA) (2014) http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rice-yearbook-2014.aspx
Ventura F, Snyder RL, Bali KM (2006) Estimating evapotranspiration from bare soil using soil moisture data. J Irrig Drain Eng-ASCE 132:153–158
Webb EK, Pearman GI, Leuning R (1980) Correction of flux measurements for density effects due to heat and water vapour transfer. Q J R Meteorol Soc 106:85–100
Acknowledgments
The authors want to thank the California Department of Water Resources for funding this research through a Water Use Efficiency Grant: Agreement 4600004204 “Water Use Efficiency in Sacramento Valley Rice Production”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by J. Chávez.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Linquist, B., Snyder, R., Anderson, F. et al. Water balances and evapotranspiration in water- and dry-seeded rice systems. Irrig Sci 33, 375–385 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-015-0474-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-015-0474-4