Advertisement

Irrigation Science

, Volume 33, Issue 5, pp 339–355 | Cite as

SISCO: surface irrigation simulation, calibration and optimisation

  • M. H. GilliesEmail author
  • R. J. Smith
Original Paper

Abstract

A model is described which applies the full one-dimensional version of the Saint–Venant equations for open channel flow to simulate the process of surface irrigation. The resulting software for surface irrigation simulation, calibration and optimisation, abbreviated to SISCO, was developed for use in a standard PC environment. Unlike some other models currently in use, SISCO can accommodate temporal variations in inflow rates and spatial variability in soil infiltration, surface roughness, slope and furrow geometry. The main focus of the paper is in regard to the calibration functionality, whereby it is capable of estimating the soil infiltration characteristic and Manning roughness from various combinations of practically obtainable field measurements.

Keywords

Surface Roughness Inflow Rate Furrow Irrigation Volume Balance Infiltration Parameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation Futures (CRC IF) for supporting the development of SISCO.

References

  1. Bautista E, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Niblack M (2009a) Analysis of surface irrigation systems with WinSRFR-Example application. Agric Water Manag 96:1162–1169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bautista E, Clemmens AJ, Strelkoff TS, Schlegel J (2009b) Modern analysis of surface irrigation systems with WinSRFR. Agric Water Manag 96:1146–1154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Belegundu AD, Chandrupatla TR (2011) Optimization concepts and applications in engineering. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  4. Clemmens AJ (2003) Field verification of a two-dimensional surface irrigation model. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 129:402–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dalton P, Raine SR, Broadfoot K (2001) Best management practices for maximising whole farm irrigation efficiency in the Australian cotton industry. Final report to the Cotton Research and Development Corporation. National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture Report. 179707/2. USQ, ToowoombaGoogle Scholar
  6. Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A (2011) Field evaluation of various mathematical models for furrow and border irrigation systems. Soil Water Res 6:91–101Google Scholar
  7. Ebrahimian H, Liaghat A, Ghanbarian-Alavijeh B, Abbasi F (2010) Evaluation of various quick methods for estimating furrow and border infiltration parameters. Irrig Sci 28:479–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elliott RL, Walker WR, Skogerboe GV (1983) Infiltration parameters from furrow irrigation advance data. Trans ASAE 26:1726–1731CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gillies MH, Smith RJ (2005) Infiltration parameters from surface irrigation advance and run-off data. Irrig Sci 24:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gillies MH, Smith RJ, Raine SR (2007) Accounting for temporal inflow variation in the inverse solution for infiltration in surface irrigation. Irrig Sci 25:87–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gillies MH, Smith RJ, Williamson B, Shanahan M (2010) Improving performance of bay irrigation through higher flow rates Irrigation Australia Conference 2010. Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  12. Gillies MH, Smith RJ, Raine SR (2011) Evaluating whole field irrigation performance using statistical inference of inter-furrow infiltration variation. Biosyst Eng 110:134–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Horst MG, Shamutalov SS, Pereira LS, Goncalves JM (2005) Field assessment of the water saving potential with furrow irrigation in Fergana, Aral Sea basin. Agric Water Manag 77:210–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jung WK, Kitchen NR, Anderson SH, Sadler EJ (2007) Crop management effects on water infiltration for claypan soils. J Soil Water Conserv 62:55–63Google Scholar
  15. Koech RK, Smith RJ, Gillies MH (2014) A real-time optimisation system for automation of furrow irrigation. Irrigation Sci, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  16. Maheshwari B, McMahon T (1992) Modeling shallow overland flow in surface irrigation. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 118:201–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. McClymont DJ (2007) Development of a decision support system for furrow and border irrigation. University of Southern Queensland, ToowoombaGoogle Scholar
  18. McClymont DJ, Smith RJ (1996) Infiltration parameters from optimization on furrow irrigation advance data. Irrig Sci 17:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McClymont DJ, Smith RJ, Raine SR (1999) An integrated numerical model for the design and management of furrow irrigation. In: Lawrence PA, Robinson J (eds) 2nd international conference on multiple objective decision support systems for land, water and environmental management. Brisbane, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
  20. Moravejalahkami B, Mostafazadeh-Fard B, Heidarpour M, Abbasi F (2009) Furrow infiltration and roughness prediction for different furrow inflow hydrographs using a zero-inertia model with a multilevel calibration approach. Biosyst Eng 103:374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Playán E, Slatni A, Castillo R, Faci JM (2000) A case study for irrigation modernisation: II: Scenario analysis. Agric Water Manag 42:335–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Raine SR, McClymont DJ, Smith RJ (1997) The development of guidelines for surface irrigation in areas with variable infiltration. In: Egan BTPO (ed) Australian society of sugar cane technologists. Cairns; Australia, Watson FergusonGoogle Scholar
  23. Rayej M, Wallender WW (1988) Time solution of Kinematic-wave model with stochastic infiltration. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 114:605–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Robertson D, Wood M, Wang QJ (2004) Estimating hydraulic parameters for a surface irrigation model from field conditions. Aust J Exp Agric 44:173–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sanchez CA, Zerihun D, Farrell-Poe KL (2009) Management guidelines for efficient irrigation of vegetables using closed-end level furrows. Agric Water Manag 96:43–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Scaloppi EJ, Merkley GP, Willardson LS (1995) Intake parameters from advance and wetting phases of surface irrigation. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 121:57–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Selle B, Wang QJ, Mehta B (2011) Relationship between hydraulic and basic properties for irrigated soils in southeast Australia. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 174:81–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shahidian S, Serralheiro RP (2012) Development of an adaptive surface irrigation system. Irrig Sci 30:69–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Smith RJ, Raine SR, Minkevich J (2005) Irrigation application efficiency and deep drainage potential under surface irrigated cotton. Agric Water Manag 71:117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Smith RJ, Gillies MH, Shanahan M, Campbell B, Williamson B (2009) Evaluating the performance of bay irrigation in the GMID. Irrigation and drainage conference 2009. Swan Hill, Vic, Irrigation Australia LtdGoogle Scholar
  31. Strelkoff TS, Clemmens AJ, El-Ansary M, Awad M (2009) Surface-irrigation evaluation models: application to level basins in Egypt. Trans ASAE 42:1027–1036CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trout TJ (1992) Furrow flow velocity effect on hydraulic roughness. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 118:981–987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Walker WR (2005) Multilevel calibration of furrow infiltration and roughness. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 131:129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Walker WR, Skogerboe GV (1987) Surface irrigation: theory and practice. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Engineering in AgricultureUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations