Skip to main content
Log in

Seasonal evolution of crop water stress index in grapevine varieties determined with high-resolution remote sensing thermal imagery

  • Review
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The seasonal characterization of spatial variability in water requirements across and within vineyards could assist the viticulturist to fine-tune irrigation management for quality optimization. Remotely sensed crop water stress index (CWSI) is related to crop water status, but it is not known how applicable it is to different grape varieties at different times of the season. This study focused on the determination of the lower and upper baselines for calculating CWSI for the Chardonnay, Pinot-noir, Syrah and Tempranillo varieties at different phenological stages. Baselines were determined based on canopy temperatures measured with infrared temperature sensors placed on top of well-watered grapevines in 2011. Results indicated that non-water-stressed baselines differed depending on variety and phenological stage. During 2011, an aircraft equipped with a thermal camera flew over the vineyards on six particular days throughout the season at 150 m altitude above ground level. At the same time, leaf water potential (Ψ L) was measured for each variety. Variety and phenological stage affected the relationship between remotely sensed CWSI and Ψ L, with phenology having greater influence on the observed measurements than on variety. For instance, the one-to-one relationship between estimated and measured Ψ L had R 2 of 0.634 and 0.729 for variety and phenology, respectively. The baselines and estimations of Ψ L were validated in different vineyards of the same region and in a different season (2013) using the same methodology as in 2011. Data obtained in 2013 were in agreement with observations during 2011. It is concluded that the use of CWSI for assessing vineyard water status requires calibration to account for the effects, primarily of phenological stage, but also, of variety. Once calibrated, this can be successfully applied to other vineyards and seasons.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alsina MM, de Herralde F, Aranda X, Savé R, Biel C (2007) Water relations and vulnerability to embolism are not related: experiments with eight grapevine cultivars. Vitis 46(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellvert J, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Girona J, Fereres E (2014) Mapping crop water stress index in a `Pinot-noir´ vineyard: comparing ground measurements with thermal remote sensing imagery from an unmanned aerial vehicle. Precis Agric 15:361–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berni JJ, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Sepulcre-Cantó G, Fereres E, Villalobos F (2009a) Mapping canopy conductance and CWSI in olive orchards using high resolution thermal remote sensing imagery. Remote Sens Environ 113:2380–2388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berni JA, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Suarez L, Fereres E (2009b) Thermal and narrow-band multispectral remote sensing for vegetation monitoring from an unmanned aerial vehicle. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 47:722–738

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clawson KL, Jackson RD, Pinter PJ (1989) Evaluating plant water stress with canopy temperature differences. Agron J 81:858–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costa JM, Ortuño MF, Lopes CM, Chaves MM (2012) Grapevine varieties exhibiting differences in stomatal response to water deficit. CSIRO publishing. Funct Plant Biol 39(3):179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field CB (1987) Leaf-age effects on stomatal conductance. In: Zeiger E, Farquhar GD, Cowan IR (eds) Stomatal function. Stanford University Press, Stanford, pp 367–384

    Google Scholar 

  • Gates DM, Papian LE (1971) Atlas of energy budgets of plant leaves. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Girona J, Mata M, del Campo J, Arbonés A, Bartra E, Marsal J (2006) The use of midday leaf water potential for scheduling deficit irrigation in vineyards. Irrig Sci 24:115–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hipps L, Asrar G, Kanemasu E (1985) A theoretically-based normalization of environmental effects on foliage temperature. Agric For Meteorol 35:113–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idso SB, Jackson RD, Pinter PJ, Reginato RJ, Hatfield JL (1981) Normalizing the stress-degree day parameter for environmental variability. Agric Meteorol 24:45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD, Idso SB, Reginato R, Pinter PJ (1981) Canopy temperature as a drought stress indicator. Water Resour Res 17:1133–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RD, Kustas WP, Choudhury BJ (1988) A re-examination of the crop water stress index. Irrig Sci 9:309–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leinonen I, Jones HG (2004) Combining thermal and visible imagery for estimating canopy temperature and identifying plant stress. J Exp Bot 55(401):1231–1243

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Marsal J, Girona J (1997) Relationship between leaf water potential and gas exchange activity at different phenological stages and fruit loads in peach trees. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 122(3):415–421

    Google Scholar 

  • McCutchan H, Shackel K (1992) Stem-water potential as a sensitive indicator of water stress in prune trees (Prunus domestica L. cv. French). J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117(4):607–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Meron M, Tsipris J, Charitt D (2003) Remote mapping crop water status to assess spatial variability of crop stress. In: Stafford J, Werner A (eds) Precision agriculture. Proceedings of the 4th European conference on precision agriculture. Academic Publishers, Berlin, pp 405–410

  • Möller M, Alchanatis V, Cohen Y, Meron M, Tsipris J, Naor A, Ostrovsky V, Sprintsin M, Cohen S (2007) Use of thermal and visible imagery for estimating crop water status of irrigated grapevine. J Exp Bot 58(4):827–838

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nobel PS (2009) Physiochemical and environmental plant physiology, 4th edn. Academic press, Amsterdam 582

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivo N, Girona J, Marsal J (2009) Seasonal sensitivity of stem water potential to vapour pressure deficit in grapevine. Irrig Sci 27(2):175–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poni S, Bernizzonia F, Civardia S, Gattia M, Porro D, Caminc F (2009) Performance and water-use efficiency (single-leaf vs. whole-canopy) of well-watered and half-stressed split-root Lambrusco grapevines grown in Po Valley (Italy). Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pou A, Medrano H, Tomàs M, Martorell S, Ribas-Carbó M, Flexas J (2012) Anisohydric behaviour in grapevines results in better performance under moderate water stress and recovery than isohydric behaviour. Plant Soil 359:335–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rogiers SY, Greer DH, Hatfield JM, Hutton RJ, Clarke SJ, Hutchinson PA, Somers A (2012) Stomatal response of an anisohydric grapevine cultivar to evaporative demand, available soil moisture and abscisic acid. Tree Physiol 32(3):249–261

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SAS (2002) Enterprise guide version 42. SAS Institute Inc., Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz HR (2003) Differences in hydraulic architecture account for near-isohydric and anisohydric behavior of two field-grown Vitis vinifera L. cultivars during drought. Plant Cell Environ 26(8):1393–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz HR, Stoll M (2010) Some critical issues in environmental physiology of grapevines: future challenges and current limitations. Aust J Grape Wine Res 16:4–24

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sepulcre-Canto G, Zarco-Tejada PJ, Jimenez-Muñoz JC, Sobrino JA, de Miguel E, Villalobos FJ (2006) Detection of water stress in an olive orchard with thermal remote sensing imagery. Agric For Meteo 136:31–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soar CJ, Dry PR, Loveys BR (2006a) Scion photosynthesis and leaf gas exchange in Vitis vinifera L. cv. Shiraz: mediation of rootstock effects via xylem sap ABA. Aust J Grape Wine Res 12:82–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soar CJ, Speirs J, Maffei SM, Penrose AB, McCarthy MG, Loveys BR (2006b) Grape vine varieties Shiraz and Grenache differ in their stomatal response to VPD: apparent links with ABA physiology and gene expression in leaf tissue. Aust J Grape Wine Res 12:2–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tardieu F, Davies WJ (1993) Integration of hydraulic and chemical signalling in the control of stomatal conductance and water status of droughted plants. Plant Cell Environ 16(4):341–349

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Testi L, Goldhamer DA, Iniesta F, Salinas M (2008) Crop water stress index is a sensitive water stress indicator in pistachio trees. Irrig Sci 26(5):395–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner NC, Long MJ (1980) Errors arising from rapid water loss in the measurement of leaf water potential by pressure chamber technique. Aust J Plant Physiol 7(5):527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weathon AD, Cooley NC, Dunn GM (2011) Use of thermal imagery to detect water stress during berry ripening in Vitis vinifera L. ‘Cabernet sauvignon’. In: 6th IS on irrigation of Hort Crops Acta Hort 889:123–130

  • Weyers JDB, Meidner H (1990) Methods in stomatal research. Longman Scientific & Technical, Harlow

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams LE, Araujo FJ (2002) Correlations among predawn leaf, midday leaf and midday stem water potential and their correlations with other measures of soil and plant water status in Vitis vinifera. J Am Soc Hort Sci 127(3):448–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan G, Luo Y, Sun X, Tang D (2004) Evaluation of a crop water stress index for detecting water stress in winter wheat in the North China Plain. Agric Water Manag 64(1):29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the team of Quantalab, IAS-CSIC of Córdoba for the technical support in field airborne flights and image processing, and particularly Prof. Elías Fereres, for his comments and suggestions for improving the manuscript. Alberto Hornero, Rafael Romero, David Notario, Alberto Vera, Jaume Casadesús, Xavier Vallverdú and Victoria González-Dugo are especially acknowledged for their technical support with data analysis and useful comments on the manuscript. Mercè Mata, Carles Paris, Jordi Oliver, Gerard Piñol, Núria Bonastre and Núria Civit are acknowledged for field measurements. This work received partial financial support from SUDOE for the European project Telerieg SOE1/P2/E082 and the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation (MINECO) for the project CONSOLIDER CSD2006-00067 and AGL2009-13105. We are grateful for the opportunity to carry out this study under the research agreement between CODORNIU and IRTA.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Bellvert.

Additional information

Communicated by V. Sadras.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bellvert, J., Marsal, J., Girona, J. et al. Seasonal evolution of crop water stress index in grapevine varieties determined with high-resolution remote sensing thermal imagery. Irrig Sci 33, 81–93 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-014-0456-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-014-0456-y

Keywords

Navigation