Irrigation Science

, Volume 32, Issue 1, pp 29–40

Generic unified rating for Cutthroat flumes

  • S. Temeepattanapongsa
  • G. P. Merkley
  • S. L. Barfuss
  • B. Smith
Original Paper
  • 115 Downloads

Abstract

Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) software was used to generate water depth and discharge data for the 24 standard-size Cutthroat flumes (CTF), as well as an additional 27 intermediate sizes. The hydraulic model was validated using information from several sources, including physical model test data for 16 standard sizes and 3 intermediate sizes. Grid-size independence was also confirmed for a range of computational cell sizes, and the calibration results for 16 of the standard-size flumes were compared with previously published calibration parameters. Through the CFD simulations, a full set of calibration and validation data was generated for each of the 51 tested flume sizes, filling the gaps in the experimental data from physical models and permitting a full analysis of flume hydraulic performance. The study resulted in a “generic” (any CTF in the dimensional range of the 24 standard sizes and specified dimensional ratios according to the original design criteria) and “unified” (for both free- and submerged-flow conditions) calibrations. From these results, a single algebraic equation was developed for free and submerged flow, relating upstream water depth and submergence to discharge. The error in the CFD-predicted discharge for all flume sizes is less than 3 % of the full-scale discharge, and the equation is applicable to both standard and nonstandard sizes.

References

  1. Aukle DA (1983) Free flow discharge characteristics of throatless flumes. M. Eng. thesis, Concordia Univ., Montreal, Quebec, CanadaGoogle Scholar
  2. Flow Science (2010) FLOW-3D version 9.4.1 user manual, Santa Fe, NMGoogle Scholar
  3. Keller RJ (1984) Cut-Throat flume characteristics. ASCE J. Hydr Engr 110(9):1248–1263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ren L (1993) Analysis of Cutthroat flume discharge ratings. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Biological and Irrigation Engr., Utah State Univ., Logan, UTGoogle Scholar
  5. Rodi W (1980) Turbulence models and their application in hydraulics—A state of the art review, International Association for Hydraulic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  6. Skogerboe GV, Hyatt ML (1967) Rectangular Cut-Throat flow measuring flumes. J Irrig Drain Div ASCE 93(IR4):1–13Google Scholar
  7. Skogerboe GV, Bennett RS, Walker WR (1972) Generalized discharge relation for Cut-Throat flumes. J Irrig Drain Div ASCE 98(IR4):569–583Google Scholar
  8. Skogerboe GV, Ren L, Yang D (1993) Cutthroat flume discharge ratings, size selection and installation. Int Irrig Center, Utah State Univ., Logan, UTGoogle Scholar
  9. Systat (2002) TableCurve 3D v4 for Windows user’s manual. Richmond, CAGoogle Scholar
  10. Temeepattanapongsa S (2012) Unified rating equations for Cutthroat flumes derived from a three-dimensional hydraulic model. Ph.D. dissertation, Dept of Civil and Environmental Eng, Utah State Univ., Logan, UTGoogle Scholar
  11. Temeepattanapongsa S, Merkley GP, Barfuss S, Smith B (2013) Generic free-flow rating for cutthroat flumes. ASCE J. Hydr Engr 139(7):727–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Torres AF (2006) Transition submergence and hysteresis effects in three-foot Cutthroat flumes. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Biological and Irrigation Engrg., Utah State Univ., Logan, UTGoogle Scholar
  13. Torres AF, Merkley GP (2008) Cutthroat measurement flume calibration for free and submerged flow using a single equation. J Irrig Drain. Eng ASCE 134(4):521–526Google Scholar
  14. Weber RC, Merkley GP, Skogerboe GV, and Torres, AF (2007) Improved calibration of Cutthroat flumes. Irrig Sci Springer 25:361–373Google Scholar
  15. Weber RC (2004) Effects of nonhydrostatic pressure distribution at measurement taps on the calibration of three-foot length Cutthroat flumes. M.S. thesis, Dept. of Biological and Irrigation Engrg, Utah State Univ., Logan, UTGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Temeepattanapongsa
    • 1
  • G. P. Merkley
    • 1
  • S. L. Barfuss
    • 2
  • B. Smith
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringUtah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Utah Water Research LaboratoryLoganUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations