Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing whole-field sprinkler irrigation application uniformity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Irrigation Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In order to assess whole-field sprinkler irrigation uniformity, an experiment was conducted to obtain water distribution profiles at 23 different pressures for each of five different sprinklers: Nelson R33, Nelson R33LP, Nelson R33 with road guard, Nelson R33LP with road guard, and Rainbird Mini Paw/LG-3. A mathematical model was developed to account for pressure variation throughout a fixed sprinkler system on a 10-ha field and to evaluate sprinkler irrigation uniformity for the whole field using interpolated water distribution profiles from the experimental data. The relationships between irrigation application uniformity and sprinkler pressure, sprinkler spacing, pressure variation, sprinkler type, and field topography were studied using the model. The results show that the coefficient of uniformity, CU, decreases rapidly when the pressure is below the low end of the manufacturer-recommended range; however, CU changes very little with pressure within the manufacturer-recommended range. The system application uniformity, CUsys, is usually less when pressure variations at different locations in a field are considered, and a simple previously published equation to predict CUsys is shown to closely approximate the CU from a more stringent calculation method. It was found that the impact of pressure variation (within the tested ranges) on application uniformity is less than that of the sprinkler spacing. Also, the effect of field topography on sprinkler application uniformity is relatively small for the cases tested herein.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Carrión P, Tarjuelo JM, Montero J (2001) SIRIAS: a simulation model for sprinkler irrigation: I. Description of the model. Irrig Sci 20:73–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen JE (1941) The uniformity of application of water by sprinkler systems. Agric Eng 22:89–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukes MD, Haley MB, Hanks SA (2006) Sprinkler irrigation and soil moisture uniformity. Paper presented at the 27th annual international irrigation show, San Antonio, TX, pp 446–460

  • Fukui Y, Nakanishi K, Okamura S (1980) Computer evaluation of sprinkler irrigation uniformity. Irrig Sci 2:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller J, Bliesner RD (2000) Sprinkler and trickle irrigation. The Blackburn Press, Caldwell

    Google Scholar 

  • Koch J (2003) Low pressure sprinkler distribution. B.S. research report. South Dakota State University, Brookings

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateos L (1998) Assessing whole-field uniformity of stationary sprinkler irrigation systems. Irrig Sci 18:73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merkley GP (2004) Catch3D users’ guide. Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Utah State University, Logan, UT. Published on-line at: http://www.neng.usu.edu/bie/faculty/merkley/CEE6001.htm

  • Merriam JL, Keller J (1978) Farm irrigation system evaluation: a guide for management. CEE Department, Utah State University, Logan

  • Montero J, Tarjuelo JM, Carrion P (2001) SIRIAS: a simulation model for sprinkler irrigation: II. Calibration and validation of the model. Irrig Sci 20:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Playán E, Zapata N, Faci JM (2006) Assessing sprinkler irrigation uniformity using a ballistic simulation model. Agric Water Manage 84:89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seginer I, Nir D, Von Bernuth D (1991) Simulation of wind distorted sprinkler patterns. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 117(2):285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiegel MR, Stephens LJ (1999) Statistics, 3rd edn, Schaum’s outlines. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarjuelo JM, Valiente M, Lozoya J (1992) Working condition of sprinkler to optimize application of water. J Irrig Drain Div ASCE 118(6):895–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vories ED, Von Bernuth RD, Mickelson RH (1987) Simulating sprinkler performance in wind. J Irrig Drain Eng ASCE 113(1):119–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Support from the Utah Water Research Laboratory and the Utah Agricultural Experiment Station, project 798, in terms of funding, facilities, and equipment, is gratefully acknowledged. Special thanks go to Dr. Michael Johnson of the UWRL.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary P. Merkley.

Additional information

Communicated by S. O Shaughnessy.

Disclaimer: The tested equipment was selected only in terms of being representative of some of the types of sprinklers that are commonly used in irrigation at present, and it does not constitute any implications of endorsement.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, L., Merkley, G.P. & Pinthong, K. Assessing whole-field sprinkler irrigation application uniformity. Irrig Sci 31, 87–105 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0294-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0294-0

Keywords

Navigation