Skip to main content

An artificial capillary barrier to improve root-zone conditions for horticultural crops: response of pepper, lettuce, melon, and tomato

Abstract

Capillary barriers (CBs) occur at the interface between two soil layers having distinct differences in hydraulic characteristics. In preliminary work without growing crops, it was demonstrated that CBs implemented in sandy soils increased hydrostatic volumetric water content by 20–70%, depending on soil texture and depth of barrier insertion. We hypothesized that the introduction of an artificial CB at the lower root-zone boundary of horticultural crops can increase yields as a result of increased water content and uptake efficiency. The effects of introduced CBs on soil water content, plant growth, and yields of bell peppers (Capsicum annum L), lettuce (Lactuca sativa L), tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculantum L.), and melons (Cucumis melo L.) were studied in a desert environment in southern Israel. Inclusion of a CB increased soil water content by 60% and biomass and fruit yields by 25% for pepper, and increased matric head and biomass yield by 80 and 36%, respectively, for lettuce. Neither tomatoes nor melons reacted significantly to the presence of CBs, in spite of increased soil moisture. Daily soil matric head amplitude was reduced fivefold when lettuce was grown with a CB. Spatial variability was highly reduced when a CB was present. When peppers were grown with a CB, the standard deviations of water content and biomass yield were reduced by 40% relative to control.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  1. Assouline S, Moller M, Cohen S, Ben-Hur M, Grava A, Narkis K, Silber A (2006) Soil-plant system response to pulsed drip irrigation and salinity: bell pepper case study. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1556–1568

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Gal A, Dudley L (2003) Phosphorus availability under continuous point-source irrigation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 67:1449–1456

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ben-Gal A, Ityel E, Dudley LM, Cohen S, Yermiyahu U, Presnov E, Zigmond L, Shani U (2008) Effect of irrigation water salinity on transpiration and on leaching requirements: a case study for bell peppers. Agric Water Manag 95:587–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ben-Gal A, Yermiyahu U, Cohen S (2009) Fertilization and blending alternatives for irrigation with desalinated water. J Environ Qual 38:529–536

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bussière B (1999) Tude du comportement hydrique de couverture avec effets de barrire capillaire inclines l’aide de modelisations physiques et numeriques. PhD thesis, cole Polytechnique de Montreal, Canada, p 354

  6. De Wit CT (1958) Transpiration and crop yields. Versl. Landbouwk. Onderz. On field crops and herbage, vol 64. Institute of Biological and Chemical Residence, The Netherlands, p 64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Feddes RA, Hoff H, Bruen M, Dawson T, de Rosnay P, Dirmeyer P, Jackson RB, Kabat P, Kleidon A, Lilly A, Pitman AJ (2001) Modeling root water uptake in hydrological and climate models. Bull Am Meteor Soc 82(12):2797–2809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Geiger SC, Manu A (1993) Soil surface characterization and variability in the growth of millet in the plateau and valley region of western Niger. Agr Ecos Environ 45:203–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ityel E, Lazarovitch N, Silberbush M, Ben-Gal A (2011) An artificial capillary barrier to improve root-zone conditions for horticultural crops: physical effects on water content. Irr Sci 29:171–180. doi:10.1007/s00271-010-0227-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jones HG (1992) Plants and microclimate, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 428 p

  11. Kampf M, Holfelder T, Montenegro H (1998) Inspection and numerical simulations of flow processes in capillary barrier cover systems. In: Holz KP, Bechteler W, Wang SSY, Kawahara M (eds) Advances in hydro-science and engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Confernce on Hydro-Science and-Engineering. Brandenburg University, Cottbus

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kravchenko AN, Bullock DG (2000) Correlation of corn and soybean grain yield with topography and soil properties. Agron J 92:75–83

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lazarovitch N, Shani U, Thompson TL, Warrick AW (2006) Soil hydraulic properties affecting discharge uniformity of subsurface drip irrigation. J Irrig Drain Eng 132(6):531–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Li H, Lascano RJ, Booker J, Wilson LT, Bronson KF (2001) Cotton lint yield variability in a heterogeneous soil at a landscape scale. Soil Till Res 58:245–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Meiri A, Plaut Z (1985) Crop production and management under saline conditions. Plant Soil 89:253–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Oron G, DeMalach Y, Gillerman L, David I, Lurie S (2002) Effect of water salinity and irrigation technology on yield and quality of pears. Bios Eng 81(2):237–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Russo D, Zaidel J, Laufer A (2007) Numerical analysis of solute transport from trickle sources in a combined desert soil: imported soil flow system. Vadose Zone J 7:53–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Segal E, Ben-Gal A, Shani U (2006) Root water uptake efficiency under ultra-high irrigation frequency. Plant Soil 282:333–341

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Shani U, Ben-Gal A, Tripler E, Dudley LM (2007) Plant response to the soil environment: an analytical model integrating yield, water, soil type and salinity. Water Resour Res 43(8):W08418. doi:10.1029/2006WR005313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Terra JA, Shaw JN, Reeves DW, Raper RL, van Santen E, Schwab EB, Mask PL (2006) Soil management and landscape variability affects field-scale cotton productivity. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:98–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vauclin M, Viera SR, Vachaud G, Nielsen DR (1983) The use of co-kriging with limited field soil observations. Soil Sci Soc Am J 47:175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wallach R, da Silva FF, Chen Y (1992) Unsaturated hydraulic characteristics of composted agricultural wastes, tuff and mixtures. Soil Sci 153:434–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Warrick AW, Yates SR (1987) Crop yield as influenced by irrigation uniformity. Adv Irrig 4:69–180

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Naftali Lazarovitch.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Ayars.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ityel, E., Lazarovitch, N., Silberbush, M. et al. An artificial capillary barrier to improve root-zone conditions for horticultural crops: response of pepper, lettuce, melon, and tomato. Irrig Sci 30, 293–301 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-011-0281-5

Download citation

Keywords

  • Melon
  • Vapor Pressure Deficit
  • Fruit Yield
  • Water Application
  • Pepper Plant