Abstract
A three-year field experiment (2006–2008) on clingstone peach cv. Andross was conducted in a commercial orchard under mechanical harvesting for the processing industry. Three irrigation strategies were evaluated: full irrigation throughout the growing season; restricted irrigation during stage-II (~70% restriction) and restricted irrigation during stage-III (~30% restriction), combined with three nitrogen fertilization treatments: 0, 60 and 120 kg N/ha. Trees were fertigated on a daily basis. Daily patterns of soil moisture were monitored with capacitance probes. Irrigation restriction strategies and nitrogen dose affected yield and fruit quality at commercial harvest. As well as the individual effects of applying irrigation strategies and N doses, interactions between the two factors were analyzed. In the second year, there was a nitrogen × irrigation interaction for fruit yield. A positive yield effect for N applied to fully irrigated trees occured, while the opposite was observed when the irrigation restrictions were applied during stage-III.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Behboudian MH, Mills TM (1997) Deficit irrigation in deciduous orchards. Hortic Rev 21:105–131
Ben Mechlia N, Ghrab M, Zitouna R, Ben Mimoun M, Masmoudi M (2002) Cumulative effect of five years of deficit irrigation on peach yield and quality. Acta Hortic 592:301–307
Besset J, Génard M, Girard T, Serra V, Bussi C (2001) Effect of water stress applied during the final stage of rapid growth of peach trees (cv. Big-Top). Scientia Hortic 91:289–303
Boland AM, Mitchell PD, Jerie PH, Goodwin I (1993) The effects of regulated deficit irrigation on tree water use and growth of peach. J Hortic Sci 68:261–274
Bryla DR, Dickson E, Shenk R, Johnson RS, Crisosto CH, Trout TJ (2005) Influence of irrigation method and scheduling on patterns of soil and tree water status and its relation to yield and fruit quality. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 40:2118–2124
Chalmers DJ, Mitchell PD, van Heek L (1981) Control of peach growth and productivity by regulated water supply, tree density and summer pruning. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 106:307–312
Chalmers DJ, Olsson KA, Jones TR (1983) Water relations of peach trees and orchards. In: Kozlowski TT (ed) Water deficits and plant growth, vol VII. Academic Press, New York, pp 197–232
Crisosto CH, Johnson RS, DeJong TM, Day KR (1997) Orchard factors affecting postharvest stone fruit quality. Hort Sci 32(5):820–823
Daane KM, Johnson RS, Michailides TJ, Crisosto CH, Dlott JW, Ramirez HT, Yokota GY, Morgan DP (1995) Excess nitrogen raises nectarine susceptibility to disease and insects. Calif Agric 49(4):13–18
Faust M (1989) Physiology of temperate zone fruit trees. John Wiley, New York
Fereres E, Soriano MA (2007) Deficit irrigation for reducing agricultural water use. J Exp Bot 58(N2):147–159
Ferrer F, Rodrigo G, Fonseca F, Domene M, Tous D, Nabau C, Villar JM (2007) Sondas de humedad en el suelo para programar el riego a tiempo real: bases de trabajo para las recomendaciones de riego. AERYD, XXV Congreso Nacional de Riegos, Pamplona
Girona J, Mata M, Arbonés A, Alegre S, Rufat J, Marsal J (2003) Peach tree response to single and combined regulated deficit regimes under shallow soils. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 128:432–440
Girona J, Marsal J, Mata M, Arbonés A, DeJong TM (2004) A comparison of the combined effect of water stress and crop load on fruit growth during different phenological stages in young peach trees. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 79:308–315
Girona J, Gelly M, Mata M, Arbonés A, Rufat J, Marsal J (2005) Peach tree response to single and combined deficit irrigation regimes in deep soils. Agric Water Manage 72:97–108
Girona J, Marsal J, Lopez G (2006) Establishment of stem water potential thresholds for the response of ‘O’Henry’ peach fruit growth to water stress during stage III of fruit development. Acta Hortic 713:197–201
Goodwin I, Boland AM (2000) Scheduling deficit irrigation of the fruit trees for optimising water use efficiency. Deficit Irrigation practices. FAO water reports 22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome
IPCC (2007) Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 976
Johnson RS (1988) Role of nitrogen in fruit size and quality of peach. In: Childers NF, Sherman WB (eds) The Peach. Horticultural Publications, Florida, pp 593–595
Kusakabe A, White SA, Walworth JL, Wright GC, Thompson TL (2006) Response of microsprinkler-irrigated navel oranges to fertigated nitrogen rate and frequency. Soil Sci Soc Am J 70:1623–1628
Li SH, Huguet JG, Schoch PG, Orlando P (1989) Response of peach tree growth and cropping to soil water deficit at various phenological stages of fruit development. J Hortic Sci 64:541–552
Minesterio de medio ambiente, Rural y Marino (2008) Anuario de estadística agroalimentaria 2007, Madrid, p 908
Mmolawa K, Or D (2000) Root zone solute dynamics under drip irrigation: a review. Plant Soil 222:163–190
Naor A (2006) Irrigation scheduling and evaluation of tree water status in deciduous orchards. Hortic Rev 32:111–165
Naor A, Stem R, Peres M, Greenblat Y, Gal Y, Flaishman M (2005) Timing and severity of post-harvest water stress affect following-year productivity and fruit quality of field-grown ‘Snow Quenn’ nectarine. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:806–812
Nolla JM, Pascual M, Dalmases J, Urbina V (2006) Historia y situación actual de la fruticultura de Lleida. Fruticultura Profesional 158:5–15
O’Connell NV, Snyder RL (2004) Monitoring soil moisture with inexpensive dielectric sensors (ECH2O probe) in a citrus orchard under low volume irrigation. Acta Hortic 664:445–451
Ortega-Farías S, Duarte M, Acevedo A, Moreno Y, Córdova F (2004) Effect of four levels of water application on grape composition and midday stem water potential of Vitis vinifera L. Cv. Cabernet Sauvignon. Acta Hortic 664:491–497
Paramasivam S, Alva AK, Fares A, Sajwan KS (2001) Estimation of nitrate leaching in an entisol under optimum citrus production. Soil Sci Soc Am J 65:914–921
Porta J, Julià R (1983) Els sòls de Catalunya. Àrea Meridional de Lleida. Generalitat de Catalunya, Departament d’Agricultura, Ramaderia i Pesca, Barcelona, p 332
Rufat J (2003) Influencia del riego y del abonado nitrogenado sobre el comportamiento vegetativo y productivo y su efecto en la calidad del fruto en manzano. Tesis doctoral. Universitat de Lleida. p 262
Rufat J, DeJong TM (2001) Estimating seasonal nitrogen dynamics in peach trees in response to nitrogen availability. Tree Physiol 21:1133–11440
Ruiz-Sánchez MC, Plana V, Ortuño MF, Tapia LM, Abrisqueta JM (2005) Spatial root distribution of apricot trees in different soil tillage practices. Plant Soil 272:211–221
SAS (2007) SAS Institute Inc 1989–2007 v9.1. Cary, NC, USA
Villar P, Arán M (2008) Guia d’Interpretació d’Anàlisis de Sòls i Plantes. Consell Cátala de Producció Integrada, Lleida, p 78
Villar JM, Ferrer F (2005) Técnicas de medida y control de agua en el suelo. In: Martín de Santa Olalla F, Lopez Fuster O, Calera A (eds) Agua y Agronomía. Editoral Mundi-Prensa, Madrid, pp 25–86
Acknowledgments
This study was financed by INIA project RTA2005-00065. Xavier Domingo received an FPI grant from LAB-FERRER, with the support of the “Departament d’Universitats, Recerca i Societat de la Informació de la Generalitat de Catalunya”. Special thanks go to the personnel and students of Area de Tecnologia del Reg of IRTA and to Josep Ramon and Fernando Sainz de la Maza from AGROCEMELI SCCL and SOLFRANC Tecnologías SL. We also acknowledge the support of the CSD2006-00067 grants to CONSOLIDER-INGENIO 2010.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by E. Fereres.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rufat, J., Domingo, X., Arbonés, A. et al. Interaction between water and nitrogen management in peaches for processing. Irrig Sci 29, 321–329 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0234-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-010-0234-4