Irrigation Science

, Volume 26, Issue 5, pp 367–374 | Cite as

Estimating the furrow infiltration characteristic from a single advance point

Review

Abstract

Management and control of surface irrigation, in particular furrow irrigation, is limited by spatio-temporal soil infiltration variability as well as the high cost and time associated with collecting intensive field data for estimation of the infiltration characteristics. Recent work has proposed scaling the commonly used infiltration function by using a model infiltration curve and a single advance point for every other furrow in an irrigation event. Scaling factors were calculated for a series of furrows at two sites and at four points down the length of the field (0.25 L, 0.5 L, 0.75 L and L). Differences in the value of the scaling factor with distance were found to be a function of the shape of the advance curves. It is concluded that use of points early in the advance results in a substantial loss of accuracy and should be avoided. The scaling factor was also strongly correlated with the furrow-wetted perimeter suggesting that the scaling is an appropriate way of both predicting and accommodating the effect of the hydraulic variability.

References

  1. ASAE (2003) Evaluation of furrows. ASAE Standard EP419. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. JosephGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker DM, Plunkett G, Sherrard J (2006) Application efficiencies and furrow irrigation functions of irrigations in sugar cane in the Ord River Irrigation Area of North Western Australia and the scope for improvement. Agric Water Manage 83:162–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bautista E, Wallender WW (1993) Reliability of optimized furrow infiltration parameters. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 119(5):784–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Camecho E, Lucena CP, Canas JR, Alcaide M (1997) Model for management and control of furrow irrigation in real-time. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 123(4):264–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clemmens AJ (2000) Measuring and improving irrigation system performance at the field level. Water—essential for life, proceedings of irrigation Australia 2000, Irrigation Association of Australia National Conference and ExhibitionGoogle Scholar
  6. Dalton P, Raine SR, Broadfoot K (2001) Best management practices for maximising whole field irrigation efficiency in the Australian cotton industry. Final report to the Cotton Research and Development Corporation. National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture Report 179707/2, USQ, ToowoombaGoogle Scholar
  7. Gillies MH, Smith RJ (2005) Infiltration parameters from surface irrigation advance and run-off data. Irrigation Sci 24:25–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Khatri KL, Smith RJ (2005) Evaluation of methods for determining infiltration parameters from irrigation advance data. Irrigation Drainage 54:467–482CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Khatri KL, Smith RJ (2006) A real time control system for furrow irrigation to manage spatial and temporal variations infiltration. Irrigation Sci 25:33–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. McClymont DJ, Smith RJ (1996) Infiltration parameters from the optimization on furrow irrigation advance data. Irrigation Sci 17:15–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Mailhol JC, Ruelle P, Povova Z (2005) Simulation of furrow irrigation practices (SOFIP): a field scale modelling of water management and crop yield for furrow irrigation. Irrig Sci 24:37–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Mwatha S, Gichuki FN (2000) Evaluation of the furrow irrigation system in the Bura scheme. Land and water management in Kenya: towards sustainable land use. In: Proceedings of the fourth national workshop, soil and water conservation branch, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development & Department of Agricultural Engineering, University of NairobiGoogle Scholar
  13. Oyonarte NA, Mateos L, Palomo MJ (2002) Infiltration variability in furrow irrigation. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 128(1):26–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Raine SR, McClymont DJ, Smith RJ (1997) The development of guidelines for surface irrigation in areas with variable infiltration. Proc Aust Soc Sugar Technol 1997:293–301Google Scholar
  15. Rasoulzadeh A, Sepaskhah AR (2003) Scaled infiltration equations for furrow irrigation. Biosyst Eng 86(3):375–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sepaskhah AR, Afshar-Chamanabad H (2002) Determination of infiltration rate for every-other furrow irrigation. Biosyst Eng 82(4):479–484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Smith RJ, Raine SR, Minkovich J (2005) Irrigation application efficiency and deep drainage potential under surface irrigated cotton. Agric Water Manage 71(2):117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Strelkoff TM, Souza F (1984) Modeling effect of depth on furrow infiltration. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 110(4):375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Strelkoff TS, Clemmens AJ, Bautista E (2000) Field-parameter estimation for surface irrigation management and design. In: Flug M, Frevert D (eds) Watershed management 2000 science and education technology for the new millennium, ASCE, RestonGoogle Scholar
  20. Walker WR (2005) Multilevel calibration of furrow infiltration and roughness. J Irrigation Drainage Eng 131(2):129–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Centre for Engineering in Agriculture and Cooperative Research Centre for Irrigation FuturesUniversity of Southern QueenslandToowoombaAustralia

Personalised recommendations