Skip to main content

Comparative study of Hargreaves’s and artificial neural network’s methodologies in estimating reference evapotranspiration in a semiarid environment

Abstract

The Penman–Monteith equation (PM) is widely recommended because of its detailed theoretical base. This method is recommended by FAO as the sole method to calculate reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and for evaluating other methods. However, the detailed climatological data required by the Penman–Monteith equation are not often available especially in developing nations. Hargreaves equation (HG) has been successfully used in some locations for estimating ETo where sufficient data were not available to use PM method. The HG equation requires only maximum and minimum air temperature data that are usually available at most weather stations worldwide. Another method used to estimate ETo is the artificial neural network (ANN). Artificial neural networks (ANNs) are effective tools to model nonlinear systems and require fewer inputs. The objective of this study was to compare HG and ANN methods for estimating ETo only on the basis of the temperature data. The 12 weather stations selected for this study are located in Khuzestan plain (southwest of Iran). The HG method mostly underestimated or overestimated ETo obtained by the PM method. The ANN method predicted ETo better than HG method at all sites.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Allen RG (1996) Assessing integrity of weather data for reference evapotranspiration estimation. J Irrig Drain Eng 122(2):97–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration. Guidelines for computing crop water requirements. Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome

  • Atkinson PM, Tatnall ARL (1997) Introduction neural networks in remote sensing. Int J Remote Sens 18:699–709

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coulibaly P, Anctil F, Bobee B (2000) Daily reservoir inflow forecasting using artificial neural networks with stopped training approach. J Hydrol 230(3–4):244–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cybenko G (1989) Approximation by superposition of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signals Syst 2:303–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Di Stefano CV, Ferro V (1977) Estimation of evapotranspiration by Hargreaves formula and remotely sensed data in semi-arid Mediterranean areas. J Agric Eng Res 68:189–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droogers P, Allen RG (2002) Estimating reference evapotranspiration under inaccurate data conditions. Irrig Drain Syst 16:33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavilan P, Lorite IJ, Tornero S, Berengena J (2006) Regional calibration of Hargreaves equation for estimating reference ET in a semiarid environment. Agric Water Manage 81:257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagan MT, Menhaj MB (1994) Training feedforward networks with the Marquardt algorithm. IEEE Trans Neural Netw 5:989–993

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves GH, Allen RG (2003) History and evaluation of Hargreaves evapotranspiration equation. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(1):53–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves GH, Samani ZA (1985) Reference crop evapotranspiration from temperature. Appl Eng Agric 1(2):96–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves LG, Hargreaves GH, Riley JP (1985) Irrigation water requirements for Senegal River Basin. J Irrig Drain Eng 111(3):265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2:359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irmak S, Allen RG, Whitty EB (2003) Daily grass and alfalfa-reference evapotranspiration estimates and alfalfa-to-grass evapotranspiration ratios in Florida. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(5):360–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar M, Raghuwanshi NS, Singh R, Wallender WW, Pruitt WO (2002) Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network. J Irrig Drain Eng 128(4):224–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann RP (1987) An introduction to computing with neural nets. IEEE ASSP Mag 4:4–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer SJ, Hubbard KG, Wilhite DA (1989) Estimating potential evapotranspiration: The effect of random and systematic errors, agricultural and forest meteorology, vol 46. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 285–296

  • Odhiambo LO, Yoder RE, Hines JW (2001) Optimization of fuzzy evapotranspiration model through neural training with input–output examples. Trans ASAE 44(6):1625–1633

    Google Scholar 

  • Prechelt L (1998) Automatic early stopping using cross validation: quantifying the criteria. Neural Netw 11:761–767

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarle WS (1995) Stopped training and other remedies for overfitting. In: Proceedings of the 27th symposium on the interface of computing science statistics

  • Silva AF (2002) Previsão da evapotranspiração de referência utilizando redes neurais. Dissertação de Mestrado, Univ. Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil

  • Sudheer KP, Gosain AK, Ramasastri KS (2003) Estimating actual evapotranspiration from limited climatic data using neural computing technique. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(3):214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Van Cauwenberghe A (1999) Neural-network-based d-step-ahead predictors for nonlinear systems with time delay. Eng Appl Artif Intell 12:21–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trajkovic S, Todorovic B, Stankovic M (2003) Forecasting of reference evapotranspiration by artificial neural networks. J Irrig Drain Eng 129(6):454–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utset A, Farre I, Martinez-Cob A, Cavero J (2004) Comparing Penman–Monteith and Priestley–Taylor approaches as referenceevapotranspiration inputs for modeling maize wateruse under Mediterranean conditions. Agric Water Manage 66(3):205–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zanetti SS, Sousa EF, Oliveira VPS, Almeida FT, Bernard S (2007) Estimating evapotranspiration using artificial neural network and minimum climatological data. J Irrig Drain Eng 133(2):83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to express his sincere gratitude to the Department of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering, University collage of Aboureyhan and University of Tehran. The research described in this paper was supported with funds provided by University of Tehran.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Rahimi Khoob.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Ayars.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rahimi Khoob, A. Comparative study of Hargreaves’s and artificial neural network’s methodologies in estimating reference evapotranspiration in a semiarid environment. Irrig Sci 26, 253–259 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0090-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-007-0090-z

Keywords

  • Root Mean Square Error
  • Artificial Neural Network
  • Hide Layer
  • Artificial Neural Network Method
  • Mean Bias Error