Irrigation Science

, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 191–202 | Cite as

Construction, installation, and performance of two repacked weighing lysimeters

  • José O. PayeroEmail author
  • Suat Irmak
Original Paper


Weighing lysimeters are the standard method for directly measuring evapotranspiration (ET). This paper discusses the construction, installation, and performance of two (1.52 m × 1.52 m × 2.13-m deep) repacked weighing lysimeters for measuring ET of corn and soybean in West Central Nebraska. The cost of constructing and installing each lysimeter was approximately US $12,500, which could vary depending on the availability and cost of equipment and labor. The resolution of the lysimeters was 0.0001 mV V−1, which was limited by the data processing and storage resolution of the datalogger. This resolution was equivalent to 0.064 and 0.078 mm of ET for the north and south lysimeters, respectively. Since the percent measurement error decreases with the magnitude of the ET measured, this resolution is adequate for measuring ET for daily and longer periods, but not for shorter time steps. This resolution would result in measurement errors of less than 5% for measuring ET values of ≥3 mm, but the percent error rapidly increases for lower ET values. The resolution of the lysimeters could potentially be improved by choosing a datalogger that could process and store data with a higher resolution than the one used in this study.


Load Cell Storage Tank Suction Tube Concrete Base Outside Diameter 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to acknowledge Merle Still, Don Davison, and Jereme Hartman for their valuable contribution to this project. We also would like to acknowledge the help of William C. Markley from the NRCS who described the soil profiles at both lysimeter sites. This paper is a contribution of the University of Nebraska Agricultural Research Division, Lincoln, NE 68583, USA (Journal Series No. 15117). Partial funding for this project was provided by the Anna H. Elliot Foundation.


  1. Allen RG, Fisher DK (1990) Low-cost electronic weighing lysimeters. Trans ASAE 33:1823–1833Google Scholar
  2. Evett SR, Warrick AW, Matthias AD (1995) Wall material and capping effects on microlysimeter temperatures and evaporation. Soil Sci Soc Am J 59:329–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Garcia M., Raes D, Allen RG, Herbas C (2004) Dynamics of reference evapotranspiration in the Bolivian highlands (altiplano). Agric For Meteorol 125:67–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Hanks RJ, Shawcroft RW (1965) An economical lysimeter for evapotranspiration studies. Agron J 57:634–636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Howell TA, McCormick RL, Phene CJ (1985) Design and installation of large weighing lysimeters. Trans ASAE 28:106–112, 117Google Scholar
  6. Howell TA, Schneider AD, Jensen ME (1991) History of lysimeter design and use for evapotranspiration measurements. In: Proceedings of the conference on lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements, IR Div/ASCE/Honolulu, 23–25 July, pp 1–9Google Scholar
  7. Howell TA, Schneider AD, Dusek DA, Marek TH, Steiner JL (1995) Calibration and scale performance of the Bushland weighing lysimeters. Trans ASAE 38:1019–1024Google Scholar
  8. Hunsaker DJ, Pinter PJ Jr, Cai H (2002) Alfalfa basal crop coefficients for FAO-56 procedures in the desert regions of the southwestern US. Trans ASAE 45:1799–1815Google Scholar
  9. Kirkham RR, Gee GW, Jones TL (1984) Weighing lysimeters for long-term water balance investigations at remote sites. Soil Sci Soc Am J 48:1203–1205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Klocke NL, Heermann DF, Duke HR (1985) Measurement of evaporation and transpiration with lysimeters. Trans ASAE 28:183–189, 192Google Scholar
  11. Klocke NL, Todd RW, Hergert GW, Watts DG, Parkhurst AM (1993) Design, installation, and performance of percolation lysimeters for water quality sampling. Trans ASAE 36:429–435Google Scholar
  12. Klocke NL, Watts DG, Schneekloth JP, Davison DR, Todd RW, Parkhurst AM (1999) Nitrate leaching in irrigated corn and soybean in a semi-arid climate. Trans ASAE 42:1621–1630Google Scholar
  13. Laubach J, Raschendorfer M, Kreilein H, Gravenhorst G (1994) Determination of heat and water vapor fluxes above a spruce forest by eddy correlation. Agric For Meteorol 71:373–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liu J, Kotoda K (1998) Estimation of regional evapotranspiration from arid and semi-arid surfaces. J Am Water Resour Assoc 34:27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Malone RW, Bonta JV, Stewardson DJ, Nelsen T (2000) Error analysis and quality improvement of the Coshcton weighing lysimeters. Trans ASAE 43:271–280Google Scholar
  16. Marek TH, Schneider AD, Howell TA, Ebeling LL (1988) Design and construction of large weighing monolithic lysimeters. Trans ASAE 31:477–484Google Scholar
  17. Marek TH, Piccinni G, Schneider AD, Howell TA, Jett M, Dusek DA (2006) Weighing lysimeters for the determination of crop water requirements and crop coefficients. Appl Eng Agric 22:851–856Google Scholar
  18. McFarland MJ, Worthington JW, Newman JS (1983) Design, installation and operation of a twin weighing lysimeter for fruit trees. Trans ASAE 26:1717–1721Google Scholar
  19. Meshkat M, Warner RC, Walton LR (1999) Lysimeter design, construction, and instrumentation for assessing evaporation from a large undisturbed soil monolith. Appl Eng Agric 14:303–308Google Scholar
  20. Payero JO (2005) Using weighing lysimeters to improve accuracy of crop water use data, project report, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, North Platte, Nebraska, pp 36Google Scholar
  21. Payero JO, Neale CMU, Wright JL, Allen RG (2003) Guidelines for validating Bowen ratio data. Trans ASAE 46:1051–1060Google Scholar
  22. Payero JO, Klocke NL, Schneekloth JP, Davison DR (2006) Comparison of irrigation strategies for surface-irrigated corn in West Central Nebraska. Irrig Sci 24:257–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Phene CJ, McCormick RL, Davis KR, Pierro JD, Meek DW (1989) A lysimeter feedback irrigation controller system for evapotranspiration measurements and real time irrigation scheduling. Trans ASAE 32:477–484Google Scholar
  24. Pruitt WO, Angus DE (1960) Large weighing lysimeter for measuring evapotranspiration. Trans ASAE 3:13–15, 18Google Scholar
  25. Schneider AD, Howell TA (1991) Large, monolithic, weighing lysimeters. In: Proceedings of the conference on lysimeters for evapotranspiration and environmental measurements, IR Div/ASCE/Honolulu, 23–25 July, pp 37–45Google Scholar
  26. Schneider AD, Marek TH, Ebeling LL, Howell TA, Steiner JL (1988) Hydraulic pulldown procedure for collecting large soil monoliths. Trans ASAE 31:1092–1097Google Scholar
  27. Schneider AD, Howell TA, Steiner JL (1993) An evapotranspiration research facility using monolithic lysimeters from three soils. Appl Eng Agric 9:227–235Google Scholar
  28. Schneider AD, Ayars JE, Phene CJ (1996) Combining monolithic and repacked soil tanks for lysimeters from high water table sites. Appl Eng Agric 12:649–654Google Scholar
  29. Schneider AD, Howell TA, Moustafa ATA, Evett SR, Abou-Zeid W (1998) A simplified weighing lysimeter for monolithic or reconstructed soils. Appl Eng Agric 14:267–273Google Scholar
  30. Seyfried MS, Hanson CL, Murdock MD, Van Vactor S (2001) Long-term lysimeter database, Reynolds Creek experimental watershed, Idaho, United States. Water Resour Res 37:2853–2856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Todd RW, Evett SR, Howell TA (2000a) The Bowen ratio energy balance method for estimating latent heat flux of irrigated alfalfa evaluated in a semi-arid, advective environment. Agric For Meteorol 103:335–348CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Todd RW, Evett SR, Howell TA, Klocke NL (2000b) Soil temperature and water evaporation of small steel and plastic lysimeters replaced daily. Soil Sci 165:890–895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tyagi NK, Sharma DK, Luthra SK (2003) Determination of evapotranspiration for maize and berseem clover. Irrig Sci 21:173–181Google Scholar
  34. van Bavel CHM, Myers LE (1962) An automatic weighing lysimeter. Agric Eng 43:580–583, 586–588Google Scholar
  35. Verhoef A, Allen SJ, Lloyd CR (1999) Seasonal variation of surface energy balance over two sahelian surfaces. Int J Climatol 19:1267–1277CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Yang SL, Aydin M, Yano T, Li X (2003) Evapotranspiration of orange trees in greenhouse lysimeters. Irrig Sci 21:145–149Google Scholar
  37. Yoder RE, Odhiambo LO, Wright WC (2005) Evaluation of methods for estimating daily reference crop evapotranspiration at a site in the humid southeast United States. Appl Eng Agric 21:197–202Google Scholar
  38. Young MH, Wierenga PJ, Mancino CF (1997) Monitoring near-surface soil water storage in turfgrass using time domain reflectometry and weighing lysimetry. Soil Sci Soc Am J 61:1138–1146CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Irrigated Farming SystemsQueensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries (DPI&F)ToowoombaAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Biological Systems EngineeringUniversity of Nebraska-LincolnLincolnUSA

Personalised recommendations