Skip to main content
Log in

Instability of reference diameter in the evaluation of stenosis after coronary angioplasty: Percent diameter stenosis overestimates dilative effects due to reference diameter reduction

  • Clinical Investigations
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: To examine changes in the reference segment luminal diameter after coronary angioplasty.

Methods: Sixty-one patients with stable angina pectoris or old myocardial infarction were examined. Coronary angiograms were recorded before coronary angioplasty (pre-angioplasty) and immediately after (post-angioplasty), as well as 3 months after. Artery diameters were measured on cine-film using quantitative coronary angiographic analysis.

Results: The diameters of the proximal segment not involved in the balloon inflation and segments in the other artery did not change significantly after angioplasty, but the reference segment diameter significantly decreased (4.7%). More than 10% luminal reduction was observed in seven patients (11 %) and more than 5% reduction was observed in 25 patients (41%). More than 5% underestimation of the stenosis was observed in 22 patients (36%) when the post-angioplasty reference diameter was used as the reference diameter, compared with when the pre-angioplasty measurement was used and more than 10% underestimation was observed in five patients (8%).

Conclusion: This study indicated that evaluation by percent diameter stenosis, with the reference diameter from immediately after angioplasty, overestimates the dilative effects of coronary angioplasty, and that it is thus better to evaluate the efficacy of angioplasty using the absolute diameter in addition to percent luminal stenosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Detre K, Holubkov R, Kelsey S, Cowley M. Kent K, Williams D, Myler R, Faxon D, Holmes D, Bourassa M, Block P, Gosselin A, Bentivoglio L, Leatherman L, Dorros G, King S. Galichia J, Al-Bassam M, Leon M, Robertson T, Passamani E, and the Coinvestigators of the NHLBI’s PTCA Registry (1988) Percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Registry. N Engl J Med 318:265–270

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Topol EJ, Ellis SG, Cosgrove DM. Bates ER, Muller DWM, Schork NJ, Schork MA, Loop FD (1993) Analysis of coronary angioplasty practice in the United States with an insurance-claims data base. Circulation 87:1489–1497

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Virmani R, Farb A, Burke AP (1994) Coronary angioplasty from the perspective of atherosclerotic plaque: Morphologic predictors of immediate success and restenosis. Am Heart J 127:163–179

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Golino P, Ashton JH, Buja M, Rosolowsky M, Taylor AL, McNatt J, Campbell WB, Willerson JT (1989) Local platelet activation causes vasoconstriction of large epicardial canine coronary arteries in vivo: Thromboxane A2 and serotonin are possible mediators. Circulation 79:154–166

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Arnett EN, Isner JM, Redwood DR, Kent KM, Baker WP, Ackerstein H, Roberts WC (1979) Coronary artery narrowing in coronary heart disease. Comparison of cineangiography and necropsy findings. Ann Int Med 91:350–356

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Clowes AW, Reidy MA, Clowes M (1983) Kinetics of cellular proliferation after arterial injury. I. Smooth muscle growth in the absence of endothelium. Lab Invest 49:327–333

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Baumgartner HR, Spaet TH (1970) Endothelial replacement in rabbit arteries. Fed Proc 29:710–715

    Google Scholar 

  8. de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW, Davies MJ, Richardson P, Lubsen J, Oliver MF (1991) Quantitative coronary angiography to measure progression and regression of coronary atherosclerosis: Value, limitations, and implications for clinical trials. Circulation 84:412–423

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Strauss BH, Escaned J, Foley DP, di Mario C, Haase J, Keane D, Hermans WRM, ter de Feyter PJ, Serruys PW (1994) Technologic considerations and practical limitations in the use of quantitative angiography during percutaneous coronary recanalization. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 36:343–362

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nissen SE (1993) Radiographic principles in cardiac catheterization. In: Roubin GS, Califf RM O’Neill W. Phillips H, Slack RS (eds) Interventional Cardiac Catheterization: Principles and Practice. Churchill Livingstone, New York, pp 409–425

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fischell TA, Nellessen U, Johnson DE, Ginsburg R (1989) Endothclium-dependent arterial vasoconstriction after balloon angioplasty. Circulation 79:899–910

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. El-Tamimi H, Davies GJ, Hackett D, Sritara P. Bertrand O. Crea F. Maseri A (1991) Abnormal vasomotor changes early after coronary angioplasty: A quantitative arteriographic study of their lime course. Circulation 84:1198–1202

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gregorini L, Fajadet J, Robert G, Cassagneau B, Bernis M, Marco J (1994) Coronary vasoconstriction after percutaneous-iransluminal coronary angioplasty is attenuated by antiadrenergic agents. Circulation 90:895–907

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Foley DP, Deckers J, van den Bos AA, Heyndrickx GR, Laarman G, Suryapranata H, Zijlstra F, Serruys P (1993) Usefulness of repeat coronary angiography 24 hours after successful balloon angioplasty to evaluate early luminal deterioration and facilitate quantitative analysis. Am J Cardiol 72:1341–1347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Hermans WRM, Foley DP, Rensing BJ, Serruys PW (1994) Morphologic changes during follow-up after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty: Quantitative angiographic analysis in 778 lesions—further evidence for the restenosis paradox. Am Heart J 127:483–494

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Beatt KJ, Luijten HE, de Feyter PJ, van den Brand M, Reiber JHC, Serruys PW (1988) Changes in diameter of coronary artery segments adjacent to stenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: Failure of percent diameter stenosis measurement to reflect morphologic changes induced by balloon dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 12:315–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Rensing BJ, Hermans WRM, Deckers JW, de Feyter PJ, Tijssen JGP. Serruys PW (1992) Lumen narrowing after percutaneous transluminal coronary balloon angioplasty follows a near Gaussian distribution: A quantitative angiographic studv in 1,445 successfully dilated lesions. J Am Coll Cardiof 19:939–945

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hirami, R., Iwasaki, K., Kusachi, S. et al. Instability of reference diameter in the evaluation of stenosis after coronary angioplasty: Percent diameter stenosis overestimates dilative effects due to reference diameter reduction. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 23, 182–186 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002700010040

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002700010040

Key words

Navigation