Abstract
Purpose
The aim of the study was to evaluate outcomes after bilateral implantation of the Gore Excluder Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis (IBE) versus those achieved after unilateral implantation.
Methods
All consecutive patients electively treated in a single center for aorto-iliac aneurysm using the IBE device between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, were reviewed. Early outcome measures were technical success, 30 days or in-hospital mortality, and major adverse events (MAE). Late outcome measures were survival, internal iliac artery (IIA) patency, and freedom from IIA branch instability.
Results
A total of 74 patients (97% males, mean age 74 ± 7 years) were included. Thirteen patients (17%) received bilateral IBE implantation for a total of 85 vessels evaluated. The technical success rate was 97% and was not significantly different between the two groups (p = .32). Two patients died within 30 days, both in the unilateral group (p = 1). No significant differences were seen in the rates of 30 days MAE (p = .10). At one year, the overall survival rate was 95 ± 2% vs 90 ± 3% in the unilateral and bilateral group, respectively (Log-rank = .05). There were no differences in 1-year primary and secondary patency rates between groups (Log-rank = .75 and Log-rank = .34, respectively). Freedom from IIA branch instability at one year was also not significantly different (unilateral: 94 ± 3% vs. bilateral: 82 ± 9%, Log-rank = .22)..
Conclusions
Bilateral IBE use for elective endovascular treatment of aorto-iliac aneurysms appears safe and feasible and may achieve satisfactory short-term and mid-term outcomes. Bilateral IBE use should be employed judiciously in the context of a comprehensive risk/benefit evaluation.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.



References
Li Y, Hu Z, Zhang J, Zheng H, Wang J, Chen Z, et al. Iliac aneurysms treated with endovascular iliac branch device: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;56:303–16.
D’Oria M, Mendes B, Bews K, Hanson K, Johnstone J, Shuja F, et al. Perioperative outcomes after use of iliac branch devices compared with hypogastric occlusion or open surgery for elective treatment of aortoiliac aneurysms in the NSQIP database. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:35–44.
Schneider DB, Matsumura JS, Lee JT, Peterson BG, Chaer RA, Oderich GS. Prospective, multicenter study of endovascular repair of aortoiliac and iliac aneurysms using the Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis. J Vasc Surg. 2017;66:775–85.
D’Oria M, Pitoulias GA, Torsello GF, Pitoulias AG, Fazzini S, Masciello F, et al. Bilateral use of iliac branch devices for aortoiliac aneurysms is safe and feasible, and procedural volume does not seem to affect technical or clinical effectiveness: early and midterm results from the pELVIS international multicentric registry. J Endovasc Ther. 2021;28:585–92.
D’Oria M, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, DeMartino RR, Kalra M, Shuja F, et al. Outcomes after standalone use of Gore Exclude Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis for endovascular repair of isolated iliac artery aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;67:158–70.
D’Oria M, Oderich GS, Tenorio ER, Karkkainen JM, Mendes BC, DeMartino R. Safety and efficacy of totally percutaneous femoral access for fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair of pararenal-thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43:547–55.
Dawson DL, Sandri GA, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS. Up-and-over technique for implantation of iliac branch devices after prior aortic endograft repair. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25:21–7.
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Sandri GA, Karkkainen JM, Kalra M, DeMartino RR, et al. Outcomes of an iliac branch endoprosthesis using an “up and over” technique for endovascular repair of failed bifurcated grafts. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:497–508.
Chaikof EL, Blankensteijn JD, Harris PL, White GH, Zarins CK, Bernhard VM, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2002;35:1048–60.
Lepidi S, D’Oria M. Long term benefits of EVAR in the modern era: the importance of looking at stent graft durability without forgetting the right pathophysiology. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2020;60:956–7.
Chaikof E, Dalman RL, Eskandari M, Jackson BM, Lee WA, Mansour MA, et al. The Society for Vascular Surgery practice guidelines on the care of patients with an abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg. 2018;67:2–77.
Wanhainen A, Verzini F, Van Herzeele I, Allaire E, Bown M, Cohnert T, et al. European Society for Vascular Surgery (ESVS) 2019 clinical practice guidelines on the management of abdominal aorto-iliac artery aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:8–93.
Mendes BC, Oderich GS, Sandri GA, Johnstone JK, Shuja F, Kalra M, et al. Comparison of perioperative outcomes of patients with iliac aneurysms treated by open surgery or endovascular repair with iliac branch endoprosthesis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2019;60:76–84.
Kliewer M, Plimon M, Taher F, Walter C, Hirsch K, Falkensammer J, et al. Endovascular treatment of hypogastric artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:1107–14.
Pini R, Faggioli G, Indelicato G, Gallitto E, Mascoli C, Stella A, et al. Early and late outcome of common iliac aneurysms treated by flared limbs or iliac branch devices during endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;30:503–10.
Giosdekos A, Antonopoulos CN, Sfyroeras G, Moulakakis KG, Tsilimparis N, Kakisis JD, et al. The use of iliac branch devices for preservation of flow in internal iliac artery during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg. 2020;71:2133–44.
de Marino PM, Botos B, Kouvelos G, Verhoeven ELG, Katsargyris A. Use of bilateral cook Zenith Iliac Branch Devices to preserve internal iliac artery flow during endovascular aneurysm repair. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2019;57:213–9.
Maldonado TS, Mosquera NJ, Lin P, Bellosta R, Barfield M, Mouossa A, et al. Gore Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis for treatment of bilateral common iliac artery aneurysms. J Vasc Surg. 2018;68:100–8.
D’Oria M, Mastrorilli D, DeMartino R, Lepidi S. Current status of endovascular preservation of the internal iliac artery with iliac branch devices. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42:935–48.
Schneider DB, Milner R, Heyligers JMM, Chakfe N, Matsumura J. Outcomes of the GORE Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis in clinical trial and real-world registry settings. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:367–77.
Eagleton MJ, Shah S, Petkosevek D, Mastracci TM, Greenberg RK. Hypogastric and subclavian artery patency affects onset and recovery of spinal cord ischemia associated with aortic endografting. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:89–95.
Simonte G, Parlani G, Farchioni L, Isernia G, Cieri E, Lenti M, et al. Lesson learned with the use of iliac branch devices: single centre 10 year experience in 157 consecutive patients. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;54:95–103.
Delay C, Deglise S, Lejay A, Georg Y, Roussin M, Schaeffer M, et al. Zenith bifurcated iliac side branch device: midterm results and assessment of risk factors for intraoperative thrombosis. Ann Vasc Surg. 2017;41:141–50.
Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Sandri GA, Ozbek P, Karkkainen JM, Macedo TA, et al. Impact of onlay fusion and cone beam computed tomography on radiation exposure and technical assessment of fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair. J Vasc Surg. 2019;69:1045–58.
Bosanquet DC, Wilcox C, Whitehurst L, Cox A, Williams IM, Twine CP, British Society of Endovascular Therapy (BSET). Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of internal iliac artery occlusion for patients undergoing EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2017;53:534–48.
Kouvelos GN, Katsargyris A, Antoniou GA, Oikonomou K, Verhoeven EL. Outcome after interruption or preservation of internal iliac artery flow during endovascular repair of abdominal aorto-iliac aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2016;52:621–34.
Bosiers MJ, Panuccio G, Bisdas T, Stachmann A, Donas KP, Torsello G, et al. Longer bridging stent grafts in iliac branch endografting doesn’t worsen outcome and expand its applicability, even in concomitant diseased hypogastric arteries. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;61:191–5.
D’Oria M, Pipitone M, Sgorlon G, Chiarandini S, Rotelli A, Griselli F. Endovascular exclusion of hypogastric aneurysms using distal branches of the internal iliac artery as landing zone: a case series. Ann Vasc Surg. 2018;46:369.e13-369.e18.
D’Oria M, Tenorio ER, Oderich GS, Mendes BC, Kalra M, Shuja F, et al. Outcomes of the Gore Excluder Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis using divisional branches of the internal iliac artery as distal landing zone. J Endovasc Ther. 2020;27:316–27.
Jerkku T, Mohammed WM, Kapetanios D, Czihal M, Tsilimparis N, Banafsche R. Extension of iliac branch device repair into the superior gluteal artery is a safe and effective maneuver. Ann Vasc Surg. 2020;62:195–205.
Dueppers P, Duran M, Floros N, Schelzig G, Wagenhauser MU, Oberhuber A. The JOTEC iliac branch device for exclusion of hypogastric artery aneurysms: ABRAHAM study. J Vasc Surg. 2019;70:748–55.
Karthikesalingam A, Hinchliffe RJ, Malkawi AH, Holt PJ, Loftus IM, Thompson MM. Morphological suitability of patients with aortoiliac aneurysms for endovascular preservation of the internal iliac artery using commercially available iliac branch graft devices. J Endovasc Ther. 2010;17:163–71.
Gray D, Shahverdyan R, Jakobs C, Brunkwall J, Gawenda M. Endovascular aneurysm repair of aortoiliac aneurysms with an iliac side-branched stent-graft: studying the morphological applicability of the Cook device. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49:283–8.
Pearce BJ, Varu VN, Glocker R, Novak Z, Jordan WD, Lee JT. Anatomic suitability of aortoiliac aneurysms for next generation branched systems. Ann Vasc Surg. 2015;29:69–75.
e Melo RG, Fenelli C, Prendes CF, Oz T, Stavroulakis K, Rantner B, et al. A cross-sectional study on the anatomical feasibility of iliac side branch grafts in a real-world setting. J Vasc Surg. 2022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2022.02.056.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
G.S.O. has received consulting fees and grants from W.L. Gore (all paid to Mayo Clinic with no personal income).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
D’Oria, M., Tenorio, E.R., Oderich, G.S. et al. Outcomes of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Use of the Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis for Elective Endovascular Treatment of Aorto-iliac Aneurysms. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 45, 939–949 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03166-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03166-3
Keywords
- Endovascular repair
- Stent-graft
- Iliac Branch Endoprosthesis
- Hypogastric artery
- Aortic disease
- Aorto-iliac aneurysms