Skip to main content
Log in

Single Institution Outcome of Minimally Invasive Enterocutaneous Fistula Management Utilizing the Biodesign® Fistula Plug

  • Short Communication
  • Non-Vascular Interventions
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To report the outcomes of the Biodesign Fistula Plug as an alternative treatment for enterocutaneous fistulae by presenting our institutional experience from 2013 to 2020.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective review of all attempted fistula closures utilizing the Biodesign Fistula Plug at a single institution from 2012 to 2020 was performed under IRB approval and in compliance with HIPAA. Patient demographics were obtained including age at the time of the procedure, etiology, location of the fistula, history of malignancy, prior chemotherapy or radiation, and history of prior surgery or other interventions. Patient follow-up was performed through 7/2020 to evaluate for fistula closure, complications, or subsequent treatments.

Results

There were 25 patients who underwent 35 Biodesign Fistula Plug placements. Of these, 7 procedures were successful, defined as closure of the fistula, and 28 procedures were unsuccessful, defined as persistent fistula output or requiring further intervention on the EC fistula. There were 7 major complications, SIR classification D = 3, E = 2 and F = 2. No statistically significant risk factors were found predicting fistula plug failure although there was a trend towards patients with malignancy having unsuccessful outcome (p = 0.057). The average number of procedures for patients with successful closure was 1.4 versus 4.22 for those with unsuccessful closure. The average time to plug failure was 27.8 days (range 3–163 days), and the average time to fistula closure following plug placement was 21.4 days (range 14–30).

Conclusion

Enterocutaneous fistulae are complex and morbid with no good treatment options. These findings demonstrate the Biodesign Fistula Plug can be successful in select patients, however, should be used with great caution due to high rate of failure and complications including two patient deaths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Tuma F, Crespi Z, Wolff CJ, Daniel DT, Nassar AK. Enterocutaneous fistula: a simplified clinical approach. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7789. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.7789.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Gribovskaja-Rupp I, Melton GB. Enterocutaneous fistula: proven strategies and updates. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2016;29(2):130–7. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0036-1580732.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Evenson AR, Fischer JE. Current management of enterocutaneous fistula. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10(3):455–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gassur.2005.08.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Williams LJ, Zolfaghari S, Boushey RP. Complications of enterocutaneous fistulas and their management. Clin Colon Rectal Surg. 2010;23(3):209–20. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1263062.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Haffejee AA. Surgical management of high output enterocutaneous fistulae: a 24-year experience. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2004;7(3):309–16. https://doi.org/10.1097/00075197-200405000-00011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Martinez JL, Luque-de-Leon E, Mier J, Blanco-Benavides R, Robledo F. Systematic management of postoperative enterocutaneous fistulas: factors related to outcomes. World J Surg. 2008;32(3):436–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-007-9304-z (discussion 44).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Li J, Ren J, Zhu W, Yin L, Han J. Management of enterocutaneous fistulas: 30-year clinical experience. Chin Med J (Engl). 2003;116(2):171–5.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Campos AC, Andrade DF, Campos GM, Matias JE, Coelho JC. A multivariate model to determine prognostic factors in gastrointestinal fistulas. J Am Coll Surg. 1999;188(5):483–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00038-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rahbour G, Gabe SM, Ullah MR, Thomas GP, Al-Hassi HO, Yassin NA, et al. Seven-year experience of enterocutaneous fistula with univariate and multivariate analysis of factors associated with healing: development of a validated scoring system. Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(9):1162–70. https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.12363.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reber HA, Roberts C, Way LW, Dunphy JE. Management of external gastrointestinal fistulas. Ann Surg. 1978;188(4):460–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000658-197810000-00003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Erdmann D, Drye C, Heller L, Wong MS, Levin SL. Abdominal wall defect and enterocutaneous fistula treatment with the vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) system. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(7):2066–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200112000-00036.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lloyd DA, Gabe SM, Windsor AC. Nutrition and management of enterocutaneous fistula. Br J Surg. 2006;93(9):1045–55. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.5396.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ballard DH, Erickson AEM, Ahuja C, Vea R, Sangster GP, D’Agostino HB. Percutaneous management of enterocutaneous fistulae and abscess-fistula complexes. Dig Dis Interv. 2018;2(2):131–40. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1660452.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee SH. Surgical management of enterocutaneous fistula. Korean J Radiol. 2012;13(Suppl 1):S17-20. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2012.13.S1.S17.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Gonzalez-Pinto I, Gonzalez EM. Optimising the treatment of upper gastrointestinal fistulae. Gut. 2001;49(Suppl 4):iv22-31. https://doi.org/10.1136/gut.49.suppl_4.iv21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Srinivasa RN, Srinivasa RN, Gemmete JJ, Hage AN, Sherk W, Chick JFB. Laser ablation facilitates closure of chronic enterocutaneous fistulae. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(3):335–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.10.028.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Smith TA, Hardman RL, Jenkins L, Marashi K, O’Hara R, Cizman Z. Extracellular matrix enterocutaneous fistula plugs show promise for low-flow colocutaneous and enterocutaneous fistulae. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;32(1):128–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2020.08.033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crespo Vallejo E, Martinez-Galdamez M, Del Olmo ML, Crespo Brunet E, Santos Martin E. Percutaneous treatment of a duodenocutaneous high-flow fistula using a new biological plug. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015;21(3):247–51. https://doi.org/10.5152/dir.2014.14421.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Brooks NE, Idrees JJ, Steinhagen E, Giglia M, Stein SL. The impact of enteric fistulas on US hospital systems. Am J Surg. 2021;221(1):26–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Nichols F, Overly A. Novel approach for enterocutaneous fistula treatment with the use of viable cryopreserved placental membrane. Case Rep Surg. 2016;2016:8797691. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8797691.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kumar N, Larsen MC, Thompson CC. Endoscopic management of gastrointestinal fistulae. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014;10(8):495–52.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge and thank Dr. Karen Brown for her guidance with this study and edits to the manuscript.

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Kaufman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

CK research grant from Boston Scientific. LJ is a paid consultant for Cook Medical (Bloomington, Indiana) and Becton, Dickinson and Company (Franklin Lakes, New Jersey). The remainder of the authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical Approval

This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Human Investigation Committee (IRB) of the University of Utah approved this study.

Informed Consent

For this type of study informed consent is not required.

Consent for Publication

For this type of study consent for publication is not required.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaufman, C., Adkison, G., Smith, T. et al. Single Institution Outcome of Minimally Invasive Enterocutaneous Fistula Management Utilizing the Biodesign® Fistula Plug. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 45, 846–851 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03099-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-022-03099-x

Keywords

Navigation