References
Long DJ, Li M, De Ruiter QMB, et al. Comparison of smartphone augmented reality, smartglasses augmented reality, and 3D CBCT-guided fluoroscopy navigation for percutaneous needle insertion: a phantom study. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02760-7.
Solbiati M, Passera KM, Rotilio A, et al. Augmented reality for interventional oncology: proof-of-concept study of a novel high-end guidance system platform. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018;2:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0054-5.
Gadodia G, Yanof J, West K, et al. True three-dimensional holographic visualization for performance of percutaneous thermal ablation of solid liver tumors: an update on in-human evaluation. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31:S135-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir2019.12.348.
Solbiati L, Gennaro N, Muglia R. Augmented reality: from video games to medical clinical practice. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2020;43:1427–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02575-6.
Uppot RN, Laguna B, McCarthy CJ, et al. Implementing virtual and augmented reality tools for radiology education and training, communication, and clinical care. Radiology. 2019;291(3):570–80. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2019182210.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declare that he has no conflicts of interest.
Consent for Publication
For this type of study, consent for publication is not required.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Solbiati, L.A. Augmented Reality: Thrilling Future for Interventional Oncology?. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 44, 782–783 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02801-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-021-02801-9