This review presents the challenges met by interventional radiologists in occupational dosimetry. The issues mentioned are derived from the recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection, the CIRSE guidelines on “Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology" and the requirements of the European directive on Basic Safety Standards. The criteria for a proper use of personal dosimeters and the need to introduce optimization actions in some cases are set out in this review. The pros and cons of the electronic real-time dosimeters are outlined and the potential pitfalls associated with the use of personal dosimeters summarized. The electronic dosimeters, together with the appropriate software, allow an active optimization of the interventional procedures.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buy single article
Instant access to the full article PDF.
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.
UNSCEAR. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation. UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes. Vol I, Annex E (Occupational Radiation Exposures). https://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2000/UNSCEAR_2000_Annex-E-CORR.pdf (accessed 11 July 2020).
ICRP Publication 139. Occupational radiological protection in interventional procedures ICRP Publication 139. Ann ICRP. 2018;47(2):1–112.
ICRP Publication 85. Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP. 2000;30(2):7–67.
Miller DL, Vano E, Bartal G, et al. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the cardiovascular and Interventional radiology society of Europe and the society of interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(2):230–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9756-7.
ICRP publication 118. ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs - Threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP. 2012;41:1–322.
European Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM on basic safety standards for protection against the dangers arising from exposure to ionising radiation (2014). Off J Eur Union L13;57:1-73 Available at https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2014:013:0001:0073:EN:PDF (accessed 5 Nov 2020).
Ciraj-Bjelac O, Rehani M, Minamoto A, Sim KH, Liew HB, Vano E. Radiation-induced eye lens changes and risk for cataract in interventional cardiology. Cardiology. 2012;123(3):168–71. https://doi.org/10.1159/000342458.
Vano E, Kleiman NJ, Duran A, Romano-Miller M, Rehani MM. Radiation-associated lens opacities in catheterization personnel: results of a survey and direct assessments. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(2):197–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2012.10.016.
Domienik J, Brodecki M, Carinou E, et al. Extremity and eye lens doses in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures: first results of the ORAMED project. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2011;144(1–4):442–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncq508.
Farah J, Struelens L, Auvinen A, et al. Application of the ELDO approach to assess cumulative eye lens doses for interventional cardiologists. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;164(1–2):84–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncu315.
Domienik-Andrzejewska J, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Askounis P, et al. Past and present work practices of European interventional cardiologists in the context of radiation protection of the eye lens-results of the EURALOC study. J Radiol Prot. 2018;38(3):934–50. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aac64b.
Martin CJ. A review of radiology staff doses and dose monitoring requirements. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2009;136(3):140–57.
Principi S, Ginjaume M, Duch MA, et al. Influence of dosemeter position for the assessment of eye lens dose during interventional cardiology. Radiat Prot Dosim. 2015;164(1–2):79–83.
Vano E, Sanchez RM, Fernandez JM. Strategies to optimise occupational radiation protection in interventional cardiology using simultaneous registration of patient and staff doses. J Radiol Prot. 2018;38(3):1077–88. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/aad429.
Sailer AM, Vergoossen L, Paulis L, van Zwam WH, Das M, Wildberger JE, Jeukens CRLPN. Personalized feedback on staff dose in fluoroscopy-guided interventions: a new era in radiation dose monitoring. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(11):1756–62.
Sailer AM, Paulis L, Vergoossen L, Kovac AO, Wijnhoven G, Schurink GW, Mees B, Das M, Wildberger JE, de Haan MW, Jeukens CR. Real-time patient and staff radiation dose monitoring in IR practice. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(3):421–9.
Baumann F, Katzen BT, Carelsen B, Diehm N, Benenati JF, Peña CS. The effect of realtime monitoring on dose exposure to staff within an interventional radiology setting. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2015;38(5):1105–11.
NCRP. Radiation dose management for fluoroscopically guided interventional medical procedures. NCRP Report No. 168. National council on radiation protection and measurements. Maryland: Bethesda; 2010.
Koenig AM, Etzel R, Greger W, Viniol S, Fiebich M, Thomas RP, Mahnken AH. Protective efficacy of different ocular radiation protection devices: a phantom study. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(1):127–34.
ICRP Publication 113. Education and training in radiological protection for diagnostic and interventional procedures. Ann ICRP. 2009;39(5):1–68.
Vano E, Sanchez RM, Fernández JM. Helping to know if you are properly protected while working in interventional cardiology. J Radiol Prot. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6498/abc325.
Bartal G, Vano E, Paulo G, Miller DL. Management of patient and staff radiation dose in interventional radiology: current concepts. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2014;37(2):289–98.
Sanchez R, Vano E, Fernandez JM, Gallego JJ. Staff radiation doses in a real-time display inside the angiography room. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010;33(6):1210–4.
Jaschke W, Bartal G, Martin CJ, Vano E. Unintended and accidental exposures, significant dose events and trigger levels in interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43(8):1114–21.
Vano E, Frija G, Stiller W, et al. Harmonisation of imaging dosimetry in clinical practice: practical approaches and guidance from the ESR EuroSafe Imaging initiative. Insights Imaging. 2020;11(1):54.
This work has been partially founded by the Spanish Nuclear Safety Council (Project EDOCI) and the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (Carlos III Health Institute) and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) under the Project MEDICI Number PI16/01413.
Conflict of interest
All the authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent for Publication
For this type of paper, consent for publication is not required. All the authors have approved the submitted manuscript.
Not necessary for this paper (review).
For this type of study, consent for publication is not required.
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vano, E., Sanchez Casanueva, R., Fernandez Soto, J.M. et al. Challenges in Occupational Dosimetry for Interventional Radiologists. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 44, 866–870 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02725-w
- Occupational radiation protection
- Personal dosimetry
- Real-time electronic dosimetry
- Interventional radiology