Abstract
Purpose
Assess international interventional radiology (IR) training standards and trainee satisfaction to identify challenges and drive positive change.
Materials and Methods
An anonymous survey was created using Survey Monkey and distributed as a single-use web link via eight IR national and international societies around the world. It consisted of two parts: the first assessed the general exposure of radiology trainees to IR and whether this influenced their decision to pursue a career in IR; the second focussed on satisfaction and quality of training by those who are in training or have recently completed an IR training program.
Results
There were 496 participants of which 274 were eligible to complete part one of the survey and 222 were eligible to complete the whole survey. UK and Europe contributed 52% of the responses. The USA and Middle East contributed 23%, and the rest of the world 9%. Over half of responders expressed that exposure early in their career was the main inspiration to pursue a career in IR. Overall satisfaction with training was high across all regions; however, satisfaction regarding vascular training varied. The negative impact of competition from other specialities ranged from 9% (USA) to 61% (UK). Great variability was reported regarding the amount of time spent dedicated to IR and IR on call.
Conclusion
Despite significant progress in creating structured and comprehensive IR training, there is still room for improvement. Early promotion of IR is essential for on-going high-quality recruitment. Monitoring and standardization of the training environment at a national and international level are necessary to equip IR trainees and to consolidate IR’s speciality status in the medical field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baum RA, Baum S. Interventional radiology: a half century of innovation. Radiology. 2014;273(2 Suppl):S75-91.
The Royal College Radiologists (RCR). Clinical radiology UK workforce consensus 2019 report. RCR report. April 2019.
European Society of Radiology (ESR). Summary of the proceedings of the International Forum 2017: Position of interventional radiology within radiology. Insights Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-018-0594-5.
The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). Specialty training curriculum in radiology. RCR report. March 2020.
European Society of Radiology. European training curriculum for radiology. Vienna. March 2020.
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe. European curriculum and syllabus for interventional radiology. June 2017.
Atiiga PA, Drozad M, Veettil R. Awareness, knowledge, and interest in interventional radiology among final year medical students in England. Clin Radiol. 2017;795(e7–795):e12.
Agrawal D, et al. Awareness and knowledge of interventional radiology among medical students at an Indian institution. CVIR Endovascular. 2019;2:45.
Makris GC, Healy GM, Cazzato RL, Benz RM, Bibok A, The European Trainee Committee. Status of vascular and interventional radiology training in Europe–A report by the CIRSE European trainee forum subcommittee. CIRSE IR News. May 2020.
Li O, Ross M, Wiseman D. Women in interventional radiology: exploring the gender disparity in Canada. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2020.02.007.
DePietro DM, Kiefer RM, Redmond JW, Hoffmann JC, Trerotola SO, Nadolski GJ. The 2017 integrated IR residency match: results of a national survey of applicants and program directors. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2018;29(1):114–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvir.2017.09.009.
National Resident Matching Program, Results and Data: Charting the Outcomes in the Match® Characteristics of U.S. Allopathic Seniors Who Matched to Their Preferred Specialty in the 2018 Main Residency Match. National Resident Matching Program, Washington, DC. 2018.
Makris GC, Uberoi R. Interventional radiology-the future: evolution or extinction? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2016;39(12):1789–90.
Keller EJ, Collins JD, Crowley-Matoka M, Chrisman HB, Milad MP, Vogelzang RL. Why vascular surgeons and interventional radiologists collaborate or compete: a look at endovascular stent placements. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2017;40(6):814–21.
Belli AM. The future of arteriography and vascular interventional radiology. Br J Radiol. 1997;1(70):S168-70.
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE). The European curriculum and syllabus for interventional radiology. CIRSE report. 2nd ed. February 2017.
The Royal College of Radiologists (RCR). Interventional radiology specialty training curriculum. RCR report. May 2020.
Schramm KM, DeWitt PE, Dybul S, Rochon PJ, Patel P, Hieb RA, Rogers RK, Ryu RK, Wolhauer M, Hong K, Trivedi PS. Recent trends in clinical setting and provider specialty for endovascular peripheral artery disease interventions for the medicare population. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(4):614-621.e2.
Harned RK, Heran MK, Patel M, Barnacle A, Cahill AM, Braswell L, Feola GP, Sierre S, Marshalleck F. Society of pediatric interventional radiology board of directors. Challenges and opportunities for continued success and growth of pediatric interventional radiology A communiqué from the society for pediatric interventional radiology. Am J Roentgenol. 2018;211(4):740–3.
O’Callaghan J, Mohan HM, Sharrock A, Gokani V, Fitzgerald JE, Williams AP, Harries RL. Cross-sectional study of the financial cost of training to the surgical trainee in the UK and Ireland. BMJ Open. 2017;7(11):e018086.
Makris GC, Byrne G. Post-partum hemorrhage and maternal mortality in low-income countries and the forgotten role of interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2019;42(12):1810–1.
Acknowledgements
We would like to sincerely help the executive committees of the following organizations for their kind help with this survey: British Society of Interventional Radiology (BSIR), Royal College of Radiology (RCR), Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe (CIRSE), Society of Interventional Radiology (SIR) Residents and Fellow Section, Canadian Society of Interventional Radiology (CAIRS), Pan Arabic Interventional Radiology Society (PAIRS), Interventional Radiology Society of Australasia (IRSA), Hispanic Society of Vascular and Interventional Radiology (SERVEI) and the Iberoamerican Society of Interventional Radiology (SIDI). We would also like to sincerely thank Dr Daniel Lapointe, Dr. Amol Mujoomdar, Dr Gerard S Goh, Dr Karim Abd El Tawab, Dr Dario Teplisky and Dr Sergio Sierre for their kind help with this survey.
Funding
No funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Consent for Publication
All authors have read and approved the submitted version of the manuscript.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable.
Informed Consent
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Makris, G.C., Burrows, V., Lyall, F. et al. Vascular and Interventional Radiology Training; International Perspectives and Challenges. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 44, 462–472 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02688-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02688-y