Skip to main content
Log in

A Retrospective Comparative Study of Twelve-Month Clinical Outcomes for Drug-Coating Balloon Angioplasty and Stent Implantation in Treating Patients with Popliteal Obstructive Lesions

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Arterial Interventions
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Despite increased interest in treating superficial femoral and popliteal arteries with endovascular technology, there is little data regarding comparative results of different treatment modalities in the popliteal artery. It was hypothesized that to improve clinical outcomes in this segment, drug-coating balloon (DCB) angioplasty would not be inferior to stent implantation.

Methods

The records of consecutive Chinese patients with popliteal lesions who were treated with DCB or stenting between June 2016 and February 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The preoperative demographic, lesion characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared and statistically analyzed. All patients were divided into different subgroups according to the degree of calcium or degree of ischemia.

Results

One hundred two consecutive patients with popliteal lesions were treated with DCB or stenting and 95 (93.1%) completed a follow-up. Critical limb ischemia was present in 70.5% and occlusions were present in 61.1% of patients. DCB angioplasty was performed on 43 patients and angioplasty with primary stenting was performed on 52 patients. There was no difference in twelve-month primary patency (79.1% vs 82.7%; P = 0.687), secondary patency (95.3% vs 94.2%; P = 0.808) and amputation-free survival (93.0% vs 94.2%; P = 0.825) between the DCB group and stent groups. In patients with severe calcium, the twelve-month primary patency (61.1% vs. 79.2%; P = 0.239) and amputation-free survival (83.3% vs 87.5%; P = 0.739) did not differ between the DCB and stent groups.

Conclusions

This study demonstrates that DCB treatment in Chinese patients with popliteal atherosclerotic occlusive lesions can be associated with similar twelve-month patency and amputation-free survival compared to stenting, even in patients with severe calcification.

Level of Evidence

Level 3a, Non-randomized follow-up study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rastan A, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, et al. Stent placement versus balloon angioplasty for popliteal artery treatment: two-year results of a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2015;22(1):22–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rastan A, Krankenberg H, Baumgartner I, et al. Stent placement versus balloon angioplasty for the treatment of obstructive lesions of the popliteal artery: a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Circulation. 2013;127(25):2535–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stavroulakis K, Schwindt A, Torsello G, et al. Directional atherectomy with antirestenotic therapy versus drug-coated balloon angioplasty alone for isolated popliteal artery lesions. J Endovasc Ther. 2017;24(2):181–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Krishnan P, Faries P, Niazi K, et al. Stellarex drug-coated balloon for treatment of femoropopliteal disease: twelve-month outcomes from the randomized illumenate pivotal and pharmacokinetic studies. Circulation. 2017;136(12):1102–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jia X, Zhang J, Zhuang B, et al. Acotec drug-coated balloon catheter: randomized, multicenter, controlled clinical study in femoropopliteal arteries: evidence from the AcoArt I trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(18):1941–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rutherford RB, Baker JD, Ernst C, et al. Recommended standards for reports dealing with lower extremity ischemia: revised version. J Vasc Surg. 1997;26(3):517–38.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Madhavan M, Tarigopula M, Mintz G, et al. Coronary artery calcification: pathogenesis and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(17):1703–14.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ranke C, Creutzig A, Alexander K. Duplex scanning of peripheral arteries: correlation of the peak velocity ratio with angiographic diameter reduction. Ultrasound Med Biol. 1992;18:433–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zeller T. Endovascular treatment of atherosclerotic popliteal artery lesions—ETAP trail results. At the transcatheter cardiovascular therapeutics meeting (TCT 2012). Miami, FL, 2012.

  10. Iida O, Soga Y, Urasawa K, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery: 2-year results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2019;93(4):664–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kokkinidis D, Hossain P, Jawaid O, et al. Laser Atherectomy combined with drug-coated balloon angioplasty is associated with improved 1-year outcomes for treatment of femoropopliteal in-stent restenosis. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25(1):81–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schulte K, Kralj I, Gissler H, et al. MISAGO 2: one-year outcomes after implantation of the Misago self-expanding nitinol stent in the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries of 744 patients. J Endovasc Ther. 2012;19(6):774–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Iida O, Soga Y, Urasawa K, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal arteries: one-year results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan randomized trial. J Endovasc Ther. 2018;25(1):109–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lu J, Gu J, Xu W, et al. Efficacy of drug-coated balloon and common balloon for treatment of superficial femoral artery and popliteal artery arteriosclerosis obliterans: prospective randomized controlled trial. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2017;37(3):296–300.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by National key research and development program (2017YFC1104100), Beijing municipal administration of hospitals clinical technology innovation program (XMLX201610), Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program (PX2018035), and Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals’ Youth Program (QML20180804).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

JG Study design, Data collection, Data analysis, Writing, LG Study design, Procedure and follow up, SC Procedure and follow up, AD Study Design, Data analysis, Writing, YQ Data collection and follow up, ZT Data collection, YG Study design, Data analysis, Writing

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Lianrui Guo or Yongquan Gu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guo, J., Guo, L., Cui, S. et al. A Retrospective Comparative Study of Twelve-Month Clinical Outcomes for Drug-Coating Balloon Angioplasty and Stent Implantation in Treating Patients with Popliteal Obstructive Lesions. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 44, 361–367 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02557-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02557-8

Keywords

Navigation