This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.


References
Anker MS, Hadzibegovic S, Lena A, Haverkamp W. The difference in referencing in Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. ESC Heart Fail. 2019;6(6):1291–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.12583.
Gusenbauer M. Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases. Scientometrics. 2019;118(1):177–214. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-018-2958-5.
Martín-Martín A, Orduna-Malea E, Thelwall M, López-Cózar ED. Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus: a systematic comparison of citations in 252 subject categories. SocArXiv. 2018. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/42nkm.
Adriaanse LS, Rensleigh C. Web of science, scopus and google scholar: a content comprehensiveness comparison. Electron Libr. 2013;31(6):727–44. https://doi.org/10.1108/el-12-2011-0174.
Rosenkrantz AB, Ayoola A, Singh K, Duszak R. Alternative metrics (“Altmetrics”) for assessing article impact in popular general radiology journals. Acad Radiol. 2017;24(7):891–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.019.
Funding
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wadhwa, V., Vilanilam, G.K. & Chick, J.F.B. Disparities in Citation Metrics Amongst Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar for Interventional Radiology Journals. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 43, 1583–1586 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02535-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02535-0