Skip to main content
Log in

The Pattern of Progression Defines Post-progression Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with SIRT

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Interventional Oncology
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with sorafenib, post-progression survival (PPS) is marked by the pattern of progression. Our aim was to assess the influence of the pattern of progression to selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) in PPS among patients with HCC.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of patients treated with SIRT between 2003 and 2015 was conducted, excluding those with a single nodule < 5 cm or with metastases. Four patterns of progression to SIRT were defined: target tumour growth, non-target tumour growth, new intrahepatic disease, and new extrahepatic disease. PPS was calculated from the time of progression based on RECIST 1.1 criteria.

Results

Out of the 102 patients who met the selection criteria, 76 progressed after a median follow-up of 15 months. Median PPS was 6.5 months (95% CI 3.8–9.3 months). Patients who progressed at pre-existing lesions had a better PPS (median 12.5 months) than those who progressed with new lesions inside or outside the liver (median 4.2 months) (p = 0.02). In a Cox model adjusted by liver function and systemic inflammation, the pattern of progression had a hazard ratio of 1.64 (95% CI 0.92–2.93; p = 0.093).

Conclusion

In a cohort of HCC patients treated with SIRT, the pattern of progression associated with worst survival was the development of new intrahepatic lesions or extrahepatic metastases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

HCC:

Hepatocellular carcinoma

TACE:

Transarterial chemoembolization

SIRT:

Selective internal radiotherapy

PPS:

Post-progression survival

BCLC:

Barcelona clinic liver cancer

CT:

Computed tomography

MRI:

Magnetic resonance imaging

tTG:

Target tumour growth

ntTG:

Non-target tumour growth

NIH:

New intrahepatic disease

NEH:

New extrahepatic disease

OS:

Overall survival

TTP:

Time to progression

HCV:

Hepatitis C viral infection

References

  1. Villanueva A. Hepatocellular carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019;380:1450–62. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1713263.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Galle PR, Forner A, Llovet JM, et al. EASL clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2018;69(1):182–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2018.03.019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Llovet JM, Zucman-Rossi J, Pikarsky E, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2016;2(April):16018. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sangro B, Iñarrairaegui M, Bilbao JI. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol. 2012;56(2):464–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2011.07.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sangro B. Chemoembolization and radioembolization. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2014;28(5):909–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2014.08.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Mantry PS, Mehta A, Madani B, Mejia A, Shahin I. Selective internal radiation therapy using yttrium-90 resin microspheres in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study. J Gastrointest Oncol. 2017;8(5):799–807. https://doi.org/10.21037/jgo.2017.08.03.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Vilgrain V, Pereira H, Assenat E, et al. Efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy with yttrium-90 resin microspheres compared with sorafenib in locally advanced and inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma (SARAH): an open-label randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18(12):1624–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(17)30683-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sangro B, Bilbao JI, Boan J, et al. Radioembolization using 90Y-resin microspheres for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;66(3):792–800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.05.065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chow PKH, Gandhi M, Tan S-B, et al. SIRveNIB: selective internal radiation therapy versus sorafenib in Asia-Pacific patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2017.76.0892.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Dancey JE, Shepherd FA, Paul K, et al. Treatment of nonresectable hepatocellular carcinoma with intrahepatic 90 Y-microspheres. J Nucl Med. 2000;41:1673–81.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kulik LM, Atassi B, Van Holsbeeck L, et al. Yttrium-90 microspheres (TheraSphere®) treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: downstaging to resection, RFA and bridge to transplantation. J Surg Oncol. 2006. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.20609.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Carr BI. Yttrium glass microspheres (therasphere) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: interim safety and survival data on 65 patients. Liver Transplant. 2004;10:S107–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/lt.20036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. de la Torre MA, Buades-Mateu J, de la Rosa PA, et al. A comparison of survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein invasion treated by radioembolization or sorafenib. Liver Int. 2016;36(8):1206–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.13098.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bolondi L, Burroughs AK, Dufour J. Heterogeneity of patients with intermediate (BCLC B) hepatocellular carcinoma: proposal for a subclassification to facilitate treatment decisions. Semin Liver Dis. 2012;32(4):348–59.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Iñarrairaegui M, Martinez-Cuesta A, Rodríguez M, et al. Analysis of prognostic factors after yttrium-90 radioembolization of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bilbao JI, Garrastachu P, Herraiz M, et al. Safety and efficacy assessment of flow redistribution by occlusion of intrahepatic vessels prior to radioembolization in the treatment of liver tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2010. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-009-9717-1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandez-Ros N, Iñarrairaegui M, Paramo JA, et al. Radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma activates liver regeneration, induces inflammation and endothelial stress and activates coagulation. Liver Int. 2015. https://doi.org/10.1111/liv.12592.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vogel A, Cervantes A, Chau I, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2018;29(Supplement 4):iv238–55. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdy308.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bruix J, Raoul J-L, Sherman M, et al. Efficacy and safety of sorafenib in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: subanalyses of a phase III trial. J Hepatol. 2012;57(4):821–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2012.06.014.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Bruix J, Reig M, Sangro B. Assessment of treatment efficacy in hepatocellular carcinoma: response rate, delay in progression or none of them. J Hepatol. 2017;66(6):1114–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhep.2017.02.032.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Reig M, Bruix J. Pattern of tumor progression in liver cancer: the missing partner in trial design. Hepatology. 2015;62(3):674–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.27881.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ogasawara S, Chiba T, Ooka Y, et al. Post-progression survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma resistant to sorafenib. Invest New Drugs. 2016;34(2):255–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-016-0323-1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Eisenhauer E, Therasse P, Bogaerts J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours—revised RECIST Guideline (version 11). Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(2):228–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Reig M, Rimola J, Torres F, et al. Postprogression survival of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: rationale for second-line trial design. Hepatology. 2013;58(6):2023–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26586.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson PJ, Berhane S, Kagebayashi C, et al. Assessment of liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a new evidence-based approach—the albi grade. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(6):550–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.57.9151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Gardini AC, Scarpi E, Faloppi L, et al. Immune inflammation indicators and implication for immune modulation strategies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients receiving sorafenib. Oncotarget. 2014;7(41):67142–9. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.11565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lué A. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in European patients with hepatocellular carcinoma administered sorafenib. Oncotarget. 2017;8(61):103077–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Petrell F, Barni S. Correlation of progression-free and post-progression survival with overall survival in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol. 2013;24(1):186–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mds289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hayashi H, Okamoto I, Taguri M, Morita S, Nakagawa K. Postprogression survival in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer who receive second-line or third-line chemotherapy. Clin Lung Cancer. 2013;14(3):261–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cllc.2012.09.006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shimokawa M, Okhi M, Kaku T. Correlation of progression-free and post-progression survival with overall survival in phase III trials of first-line chemotherapy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2015;36(4):370–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Salem R, Gabr A, Riaz A, et al. Institutional decision to adopt Y90 as primary treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma informed by a 1,000-patient 15-year experience. Hepatology. 2018;68(4):1429–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.29691.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mazzaferro V, Sposito C, Bohoori S, et al. Yttrium-90 radioembolization for intermediate-advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a phase 2 study. Hepatology. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.26014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Salem R, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, et al. Radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma using yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive report of long-term outcomes. Gastroenterology. 2010;138(1):52–64. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2009.09.006.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mora RA, Ali R, Gabr A, et al. Pictorial essay: imaging findings following Y90 radiation segmentectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma. Abdom Radiol. 2018;43(7):1723–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-017-1391-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Carmen Fuertes for her work in taking care of the patients treated with SIRT and her commitment to medical research.

Funding

Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD) is supported by Instituto de Salud Carlos III.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Carlota Jordán-Iborra, Manuel de la Torre-Aláez and Bruno Sangro conceived and designed the study. Carlota Jordán-Iborra completed the database and performed the statistical analysis. All authors evaluated the initial results and discussed the findings for further analysis. Carlota Jordán-Iborra, Manuel de la Torre-Aláez and Bruno Sangro wrote the first draft of the manuscript that was revised by all authors upon completion. Guarantor of the article: Bruno Sangro.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel de la Torre-Aláez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

José Ignacio Bilbao has received consulting and lecture fees from Sirtex Medical. Macarena Rodriguez-Fraile has received lecture fees from Sirtex Medical. Bruno Sangro has received consulting fees and/or lecture fees from Astra Zeneca, Bayer, BMS, BTG, Novartis, Sirtex Medical, and Terumo. Mercedes Iñarrairaegui has been supported by a grant from the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (PI13/01184).

Ethics Approval

The local Ethics committee approved this retrospective study and a waiver of patient’s informed consent was granted due to the retrospective nature of this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Figure S1

Time to progression according to the pattern of progression (JPEG 49 kb)

Figure S2

Post-progression survival according to pattern of progression in patients fit for second line treatments at progression (JPEG 57 kb)

Supplemental table 1

Treatment received prior to SIRT and after progression in the entire cohort and in patients fit for second line treatments at progression (DOCX 14 kb)

Supplemental table 2

Selective internal radiation therapy details according to the pattern of progression (DOCX 15 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de la Torre-Aláez, M., Jordán-Iborra, C., Casadei-Gardini, A. et al. The Pattern of Progression Defines Post-progression Survival in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated with SIRT. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 43, 1165–1172 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02444-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-020-02444-2

Keywords

Navigation