Effects of Varicocele Treatment on Sperm Conventional Parameters: Surgical Varicocelectomy Versus Sclerotherapy
- 189 Downloads
Varicocele is often associated with impaired sperm parameters. Different procedures have been developed for varicocele treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of varicocele treatment on conventional sperm parameters.
Materials and Methods
We compared two different techniques of intervention: surgical varicocelectomy and sclerotherapy. We also evaluated the number of varicocele recurrences and the pregnancy rate. We included 102 patients (mean age 29.8 ± 0.8 years) with ultrasound diagnosis of varicocele. We excluded patients whose ultrasound evaluation and/or sperm parameters were not known before and after varicocele correction. We divided the patients (excluding 8 with azoospermia) into two subgroups: surgical varicocelectomy (n = 44) and sclerotherapy (n = 50). For each patient, we compared conventional sperm parameters before and after varicocele correction.
After varicocele correction, we found a significant improvement in sperm concentration, total count and total motility. Considering the two subgroups, baseline sperm parameters did not differ significantly. Sperm concentration and total count increased significantly after varicocele correction by varicocelectomy. Varicocele correction by sclerotherapy resulted in a significant increase in sperm concentration, progressive and total motility. We found varicocele recurrence in 32% of patients who underwent varicocelectomy and in 19.7% of patients undergoing sclerotherapy. The pregnancy rate was higher after sclerotherapy (28%) than after surgical varicocelectomy (13%).
Varicocele treatment must be recommended when other causes of infertility have been treated. Our results suggest the use of sclerotherapy for varicocele repair.
Level of Evidence
KeywordsVaricocele Conventional sperm parameters Surgical varicocelectomy Sclerotherapy
LMM and LM are the principal investigators. MC, RAC, AB, AA, SLV, GM and GIR have contributed in methodological and statistical aspects. AEC is the coordinator of the study.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest that could be perceived as prejudicing the impartiality of the research reported.
- 1.Belker AM. The varicocele and male infertility. Urol Clin North Am. 1981;8:41–51.Google Scholar
- 8.Makris GC, Efthymiou E, Little M, Boardman P, Anthony S, Uberoi R, Tapping C. Safety and effectiveness of the different types of embolic materials for the treatment of testicular varicoceles: a systematic review. Br J Radiol. 2018;91:20170445. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr.20170445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dewire DM, Thomas AJ Jr, Falk RM, Geisinger MA, Lammert GK. Clinical outcome and cost comparison of percutaneous embolization and surgical ligation of varicocele. J Androl. 1994;15(Suppl):38S–42S.Google Scholar
- 12.Austoni E, Cazzaniga A, Gatti G, Baroni P, Gentilini O, Levorato CA. Varicocele and its repercussion on infertility. Indications and limitations of surgical intervention. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 1998;70:103–7.Google Scholar
- 15.WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination and Processing of Human Semen. 5th ed. World Health Organization, 2010.Google Scholar
- 16.Sarteschi LM. Lo studio del varicocele con eco-color-Doppler. G Ital Ultrasonologia. 1993;4:43–9.Google Scholar
- 17.Ivanissevich O. Left varicocele due to reflux; experience with 4,470 operative cases in forty-two years. J Int Coll Surg. 1960;34:742–55.Google Scholar
- 19.Basile A, Failla G, La Vignera S, Condorelli RA, Calogero A, Vicari E, Granata A, Mundo E, Caltabiano G, Pizzarelli M, Messina M, Scavone G, Lanzafame F, Iezzi R, Tsetis D. Left spermatic vein retrograde sclerosis: comparison between sclerosant agent injection through a diagnostic catheter versus through an occluding balloon catheter. Radiol Med. 2015;120:483–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-014-0478-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Dieamant F, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Conmar V, Mattila M, Vagnini LD, Renzi A, Costa BP, Zamara C, Oliveira JBA, Baruffi RLR, Franco JG Jr. Semen parameters in men with varicocele: DNA fragmentation, chromatin packaging, mitochondrial membrane potential, and apoptosis. JBRA Assist Reprod. 2017;21:295–301. https://doi.org/10.5935/1518-0557.20170053.Google Scholar
- 27.Evers JL, Collins JA. Surgery or embolisation for varicocele in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;3:CD000479.Google Scholar
- 28.Evers JH, Collins J, Clarke J. Surgery or embolisation for varicoceles in subfertile men. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; (3):CD000479. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.cd000479.pub3. (Review). Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(1):CD000479.
- 31.Condorelli RA, Calogero AE, Mongioi’ L, Vicari E, Russo GI, Lanzafame F, La Vignera S. Varicocele and concomitant dilation of the periprostatic venous plexus: effects on semen viscosity sperm parameters. J Endocrinol Invest. 2016;39:543–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40618-015-0401-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Vicari E, La Vignera S, Tracia A, Cardì F, Donati A. Varicocele and coincidental abacterial prostato-vesiculitis: negative role about the sperm output. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2003;75:35–9.Google Scholar
- 34.Shabbir M, Shukla C, Brown G, Dorkin T, Lucky M, Pearcy R, Rees R, Summerton D, Muneer A, on behalf the BAUS Section of Andrology and Genitourethral Surgery. Surgical management of azoospermia: can the NHS England Clinical Commissioning Policy reduce geographical inequality of services? BJU Int. 2018;121:172–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.14068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 39.Bou Nasr E, Binhazzaa M, Almont T, Rischmann P, Soulie M, Huyghe E. Subinguinal microsurgical varicocelectomy vs. percutaneous embolization in infertile men: Prospective comparison of reproductive and functional outcomes. Basic ClinAndrol 2017; 27:11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12610-017-0055-x. eCollection 2017.