Skip to main content
Log in

Image Fusion Guidance with Pre-procedural CT with Real-Time Fluoroscopy for Adrenal Venous Sampling

  • Clinical Investigation
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To assess the effectiveness of image fusion guidance (IF) with pre-procedural computed tomography (CT) with intraprocedural fluoroscopy for adrenal venous sampling (AVS).

Materials and Methods

AVS before and after ACTH stimulation including bilateral segmental sampling of effluent tributaries was performed in 62 patients with IF. A 3D volume rendering image, including adrenal glands and veins extracted from previously obtained contrast-enhanced CT images, was manually registered to the real-time X-ray fluoroscopy. The technical success rates, procedure time, radiation exposure, and volume of contrast medium used were compared with 49 patients who underwent AVS without IF.

Results

No significant differences in the technical success rates with and without IF were observed (98.4 vs. 91.8% for the right adrenal veins, p = 0.168, and 98.4 vs. 100% for the left adrenal veins, p = 1.000). The procedure time with IF was significantly shorter than that without IF (95.6 ± 18.8 vs. 108.4 ± 20.0 min, p = 0.001). The total dose-area product with IF was significantly lower than that without IF (43.1 ± 30.7 vs. 72.2 ± 45.3 Gy cm2, p < 0.001). The contrast medium volume used with IF was significantly lower than that without IF (54.6 ± 21.9 vs. 65.7 ± 27.6 mL, p = 0.020).

Conclusions

Although the contribution to improving the technical success rates was small in our study, IF can effectively reduce procedure time, radiation exposure, and volume of contrast medium during AVS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nishikawa T, Omura M, Satoh F, Task Force Committee on Primary Aldosteronism, The Japan Endocrine Society, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of primary aldosteronism—the Japan Endocrine Society 2009. Endocr J. 2011;58(9):711–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Rossi GP, Auchus RJ, Brown M, et al. An expert consensus statement on use of adrenal vein sampling for the subtyping of primary aldosteronism. Hypertension. 2014;63(1):151–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Funder JW, Carey RM, Fardella C, Endocrine Society, et al. Case detection, diagnosis, and treatment of patients with primary aldosteronism: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(9):3266–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Young WF Jr, Klee GG. Primary aldosteronism. Diagnostic evaluation. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 1988;17(2):367–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Young WF, Stanson AW, Thompson GB, et al. Role for adrenal venous sampling in primary aldosteronism. Surgery. 2004;136(6):1227–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Daunt N. Adrenal vein sampling: how to make it quick, easy, and successful. Radiographics. 2005;25(Suppl 1):S143–58.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Morita S, Yamazaki H, Sonoyama Y, Nishina Y, Ichihara A, Sakai S. Successful adrenal venous sampling by non-experts with reference to CT images. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2016;39(7):1001–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Matsuura T, Takase K, Ota H, et al. Radiologic anatomy of the right adrenal vein: preliminary experience with MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191(2):402–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Degenhart C, Strube H, Betz MJ, et al. CT mapping of the vertebral level of right adrenal vein. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015;21(1):60–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nishikawa T, Matsuzawa Y, Saito J, Omura M. Is it possible to extirpate cardiovascular events in primary aldosteronism after surgical treatment. Jpn Clin Med. 2010;30(1):21–3.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Satani N, Ota H, Seiji K, et al. Intra-adrenal aldosterone secretion: segmental adrenal venous sampling for localization. Radiology. 2016;278(1):265–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tacher V, Lin M, Desgranges P, Deux JF, Grünhagen T, Becquemin JP, Luciani A, Rahmouni A, Kobeiter H. Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(11):1698–706.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bargellini I, Turini F, Bozzi E, Lauretti D, Cicorelli A, Lunardi A, Cioni R, Bartolozzi C. Image fusion of preprocedural CTA with real-time fluoroscopy to guide proper hepatic artery catheterization during transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: a feasibility study. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2013;36(2):526–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Morita S, Endo K, Suzaki S, Ishizaki U, Yamazaki H, Nishina Y, Sakai S. Reduction of radiation exposure using dynamic trace digital angiography and spot fluoroscopy during adrenal venous sampling. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2017;40(5):697–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Miller DL, Vañó E, Bartal G, Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe, Society of Interventional Radiology, et al. Occupational radiation protection in interventional radiology: a joint guideline of the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology Society of Europe and the Society of Interventional Radiology. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21(5):607–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Morita S, Nishina Y, Yamazaki H, Sonoyama Y, Ichihara A, Sakai S. Dual adrenal venous phase contrast-enhanced MDCT for visualization of right adrenal veins in patients with primary aldosteronism. Eur Radiol. 2016;26(7):2073–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA. Multisection CT protocols: sex-and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from dose-length product. Radiology. 2010;257(1):158–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Omura K, Ota H, Takahashi Y, Matsuura T, Seiji K, Arai Y, Morimoto R, Satoh F, Takase K. Anatomical variations of the right adrenal vein: concordance between multidetector computed tomography and catheter venography. Hypertension. 2017;69(3):428–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB, SIR Safety and Health Committee, CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee, et al. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7 Suppl):S263–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Satoru Morita.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morita, S., Yamazaki, H., Endo, K. et al. Image Fusion Guidance with Pre-procedural CT with Real-Time Fluoroscopy for Adrenal Venous Sampling. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 1214–1222 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1930-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1930-3

Keywords

Navigation