Skip to main content
Log in

Broken Wings: First Reported Cases of Fractured Angel® Catheters, a Temporary Combined Femoral Venous Catheter and Retrievable IVC Filter Device

  • Case Report
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There has been increasing use of a novel combined femoral venous sheath, catheter and retrievable self-expanding and collapsible diamond-shaped IVC filter (Angel® Catheter, BiO2 Medical), in severely injured patients who cannot receive anticoagulation. As the filter is not detached from the catheter/sheath, it should be easily retrieved. Outcomes included in large registries demonstrate a high safety profile and a 100% retrieval rate. However, at our institution—a Level 1 major UK trauma centre with 4 years of substantial experience in using this device—we’ve encountered three cases of device fracture and subsequent complicated retrieval dating from Dec 2016 to March 2017. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, we describe the first documented case series of fractured Angel® Catheters and their retrieval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carlin MN, Daneshpajouh A, Catino J, Bukur M. Money well spent? A cost and utilization analysis of prophylactic inferior vena cava filter placement in high-risk trauma patients. J Surg Res. 2017;220:105–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Park MS, Perkins SE, Spears GM, Ashrani AA, Leibson CL, Boos CM, et al. Risk factors for venous thromboembolism after acute trauma: a population-based case-cohort study. Thromb Res Thromb Res. 2016;144:40–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geerts WH, Jay RM, Code KI, Chen E, Szalai JP, Saibil EA, et al. A comparison of low-dose heparin with low-molecular-weight heparin as prophylaxis against venous thromboembolism after major trauma. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:701–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berber O, Vasireddy A, Nzeako O, Tavakkolizadeh A. The high-risk polytrauma patient and inferior vena cava filter use. Injury. 2017;48:1400–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Logan C, O’Connell N, Kavanagh J, McEniff N, Ryan M, Guiney M, et al. Out of sight, out of mind? An audit which proposes a follow-up and management pathway for inferior vena cava filters. Thrombosis. 2016;2016:6538456.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Tan XL, Tam C, Mckellar R, Nandurkar H, Bazargan A. Out of sight, out of mind: an audit of inferior vena cava filter insertion and clinical follow up in an Australian institution and literature review. Intern Med J. 2013;43:365–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sildiroglu O, Ozer H, Turba UC. Management of the thrombosed filter-bearing inferior vena cava. Semin Interv Radiol. 2012;29:57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Taccone FS, Bunker N, Waldmann C, De Backer D, Brohi K, Jones RG, et al. A new device for the prevention of pulmonary embolism in critically ill patients: results of the European Angel Catheter Registry. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79:456–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tapson VF, Hazelton JP, Myers J, Robertson C, Gilani R, Dunn JA, et al. Evaluation of a device combining an inferior vena cava filter and a central venous catheter for preventing pulmonary embolism among critically ill trauma patients. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2017;28:1248–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Baumann S, Becher T, Giannakopoulos K, Jabbour C, Rutsch M, Fastner C, et al. Bedside implantation of a new temporary vena cava inferior filter-Safety and efficacy results of the European ANGEL-Registry. J Crit Care. 2018;44:39–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Waltz P, Zuckerbraun BS. Inferior vena cava filters in trauma patients—for whom the benefit tolls? JAMA Surg. 2017;152:81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarosiek S, Rybin D, Weinberg J, Burke PA, Kasotakis G, Sloan JM. Association between inferior vena cava filter insertion in trauma patients and in-hospital and overall mortality. JAMA Surg. 2017;152:75–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bikdeli B, Chatterjee S, Desai NR, Kirtane AJ, Desai MM, Bracken MB, et al. Inferior vena cava filters to prevent pulmonary embolism: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1587–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. BIO2 Medical (2016) Angel® Catheter. Femoral approach. Instructions for use. Catalog No. AC3930A.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Rashid Akhtar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Nicholas Bunker received an honorarium from BiO2 Medical in 2014 for his time spent acquiring and entering patient data into the European Angel Catheter Registry. On behalf of the remaining authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval statement

Ethical approval is not required as this is a case report.

Informed consent statement

This does not apply.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Akhtar, M.R., Tun, J.K., Alchanan, R. et al. Broken Wings: First Reported Cases of Fractured Angel® Catheters, a Temporary Combined Femoral Venous Catheter and Retrievable IVC Filter Device. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 1128–1133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1927-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1927-y

Keywords

Navigation