Abstract
Purpose
The purpose of this work was to describe the results of a technique of simultaneous antegrade and retrograde vascular access (“criss-cross”) to the popliteal vein to achieve venous recanalization in patients with acute, extensive, iliofemoral DVT with concomitant popliteal and calf vein thrombosis.
Materials and Methods
Seven patients were treated using this technique, in three patients as a bailout option after failed posterior tibial vein puncture and in four as a first option. Antegrade popliteal venous access was performed according to the usual technique using duplex ultrasound (DUS) guidance and thrombolysis (CDT), or thrombectomy (PMT) was performed. Following this, the retrograde sheath was placed under DUS guidance, a tibial vein was selectively catheterized and CDT, and/or a PMT was performed.
Results
Three patients underwent isolated CDT, another three had associated PMT, and one patient underwent iliofemoral PMT and catheter thromboaspiration of the popliteal and calf veins. Median thrombolysis duration was 72 h (24–72 h). SIR grade III thrombolysis was achieved in six patients and grade II in one patient. All patients underwent subsequent stenting of their iliac vein lesions. Minor complications were observed in two patients (ecchymosis), while one patient developed a hematoma on the popliteal fossa.
Conclusion
This “criss-cross” technique represents a safe alternative to the distal (anterior or posterior tibial) vein access both as a bailout option after failed distal venous access as well as a primary approach due to its potential advantage of clearing larger thrombus volume. Experience in ultrasound-guided popliteal vein puncture is crucial to avoid complications.
Level of Evidence
Case series, Level IV.
References
Hull RD, Raskob GE, Hirsh J. Prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism. An overview. Chest. 1986;89(5):374–83.
Kearon C. Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation. 2003;107(23):22–30.
Kahn SR. The post-thrombotic syndrome. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2010;2010:216–20.
Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH, et al. Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomized, controlled trial. Ann Int Med. 2004;141:249–56.
Brandjes DP, Buller HR, Heijboer H, et al. Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1997;349:759–62.
Enden T, Haig Y, Klow NE, et al. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:31–8.
Kwo WT. Optimizing catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis: validating the open vein hypothesis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:24–6.
Franzeck UK, Schalch I, Jager KA, et al. Prospective 12-year follow-up study of clinical and hemodynamic sequelae after deep vein thrombosis in low-risk patients (Zurich study). Circulation. 1996;93:74–9.
Haig Y, Enden T, Slagsvold CE, et al. Residual rates of reflux and obstruction and their correlation to post-thrombotic syndrome in a randomized study on catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2014;2(2):123–30.
Haig Y, Enden T, Slagsvold CE, et al. Determinants of early and long-term efficacy of catheter-directed thrombolysis in proximal deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24(1):17–24.
Vedantham S, Grassi CJ, Ferral H, et al. Reporting standards for endovascular treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:391–408.
Rutherford RB, Padberg FT Jr, Comerota AJ, et al. Venous severity scoring: an adjunct to venous outcome assessment. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:1307–12.
Labropoulos N, Waggoner T, Sammis W, et al. The effect of venous thrombus location and extent on the development of post-thrombotic signs and symptoms. J Vasc Surg. 2008;48:407–12.
Ziegler S, Schillinger M, Maca TH, et al. Post-thrombotic syndrome after primary event of deep venous thrombosis 10 to 20 years ago. Thromb Res. 2001;101:23–33.
Jeyabalan G, Marone L, Rhee R, et al. Inflow thrombosis does not adversely affect thrombolysis outcomes of symptomatic iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2011;54:448–53.
Park E-A, Chung JW, Lee W, et al. Three-dimensional evaluation of the anatomic variations of the femoral vein and popliteal vein in relation to the accompanying artery by using CT venography. Korean J Radiol. 2011;12(3):327–40.
Quinlan DJ, Alikhan R, Gishen P, et al. Variations in lower limb venous anatomy: implications for US diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. Radiology. 2003;228:443–8.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Carolina Mateus, from the Anesthesiology Department, Centro Hospitalar do Porto, for providing the ultrasound images and for the help with its neuroanatomical interpretation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Co-author Gerard J. O’Sullivan is a speaker for the following companies: BSCI, Medtronic, Bard, Marvao and Straub. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rego, D.C., Ahmed, A.K.S. & O’Sullivan, G.J. Addressing Infra-popliteal Thrombus in Iliofemoral DVT: The Criss-Cross Technique. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 1095–1099 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1918-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1918-z