Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Challenging TIPS in Liver Transplant Recipients: The Pull-Through Technique to Address Piggyback Anastomosis

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The hepatic vein access during transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) can be challenging in liver transplant recipient patients, especially when piggyback anastomosis was performed. We described a modified technique and reviewed the clinical outcomes of TIPS in transplanted patients.

Materials and Methods

From 2015 to 2016, 8 patients with history of liver transplantation using a three-hepatic vein piggyback technique for venous anastomosis underwent a TIPS in our institution. Indications were refractory ascites (n = 7) or variceal bleeding (n = 1). When the hepatic vein access failed via the standard jugular route, a pull-through technique was used: After puncturing the right hepatic vein under ultrasound guidance, a guidewire and a vascular sheath were advanced, then the guidewire was snared in the inferior vena cava and retrieved though the jugular access, and the hepatic vein was catheterized along the guidewire. The safety and technical success rates of this technique and the clinical outcomes of the study population were retrospectively assessed.

Results

Seven of 8 patients (87.5%) required the pull-through technique to access a hepatic vein. No complications of the percutaneous access of the hepatic vein were found at the one-day and one-month ultrasound Doppler examinations. Among 7 patients who had refractory ascites, 3 had complete resolution of ascites (43%), and one had moderate improvement. One patient with refractory infected ascites on severe graft failure and one with massive bleeding died soon after the procedure.

Conclusion

A pull-through technique following percutaneous puncture of a hepatic vein is a safe technique for performing a TIPS in liver transplant recipients with piggyback anastomosis complicated by acute hepatic vein angulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Abbreviations

TIPS:

Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt

OLT:

Orthotopic liver transplantation

IVC:

Inferior vena cava

US:

Ultrasound

mn:

Minutes

References

  1. Bonnel AR, Bunchorntavakul C, Rajender Reddy K. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients. Liver Transpl. 2014;20:130–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Saad WE, Darwish WM, Davies MG, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients: technical analysis and clinical outcome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013;200:210–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Patel NH, Patel J, Behrens G, Savo A. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients: technical considerations and review of the literature. Semin Interv Radiol. 2005;22:329–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chan T, DeGirolamo K, Chartier-Plante S, Buczkowski AK. Comparison of three caval reconstruction techniques in orthotopic liver transplantation: a retrospective review. Am J Surg. 2017;213:943–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Soares GM, Murphy TP. Transcaval TIPS: indications and anatomic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:1233–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Gasparini D, Del Forno M, Sponza M, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt by direct transcaval approach in patients with acute and hyperacute Budd–Chiari syndrome. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2002;14:567–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Saad WE, Darwish WM, Davies MG, Waldman DL. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in liver transplant recipients for management of refractory ascites: clinical outcome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2010;21:218–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Richard HM 3rd, Cooper JM, Ahn J, Silberzweig JE, Emre SH, Mitty HA. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts in the management of Budd–Chiari syndrome in the liver transplant patient with intractable ascites: anatomic considerations. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1998;9:137–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Van Ha TG, Funaki BS, Ehrhardt J, et al. Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement in liver transplant recipients: experiences with pediatric and adult patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:920–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Song AT, Avelino-Silva VI, Pecora RA, Pugliese V, D’Albuquerque LA, Abdala E. Liver transplantation: fifty years of experience. World J Gastroenterol. 2014;20:5363–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Starzl TE, Marchioro TL, Vonkaulla KN, Hermann G, Brittain RS, Waddell WR. Homotransplantation of the liver in humans. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1963;117:659–76.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Calne RY, Williams R. Liver transplantation in man. I. Observations on technique and organization in five cases. Br Med J. 1968;4:535–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzakis A, Todo S, Starzl TE. Orthotopic liver transplantation with preservation of the inferior vena cava. Ann Surg. 1989;210:649–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Belghiti J, Panis Y, Sauvanet A, Gayet B, Fekete F. A new technique of side to side caval anastomosis during orthotopic hepatic transplantation without inferior vena caval occlusion. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1992;175:270–2.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Audet M, Piardi T, Panaro F, et al. Four hundred and twenty-three consecutive adults piggy-back liver transplantations with the three suprahepatic veins: was the portal systemic shunt required? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:591–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tayar C, Kluger MD, Laurent A, Cherqui D. Optimizing outflow in piggyback liver transplantation without caval occlusion: the three-vein technique. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:88–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Panaro F, Navarro F. Optimizing outflow in piggyback liver transplantation without caval occlusion: the three-vein technique. Liver Transpl. 2011;17:742 (author reply 743–744).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Saad WE. Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt before and after Liver Transplantation. Semin Interv Radiol. 2014;31:243–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ferral H, Bilbao JI. The difficult transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: alternative techniques and “tips” to successful shunt creation. Semin Interv Radiol. 2005;22:300–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Petersen B, Binkert C. Intravascular ultrasound-guided direct intrahepatic portacaval shunt: midterm follow-up. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:927–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Haskal ZJ, Duszak R Jr, Furth EE. Transjugular intrahepatic transcaval portosystemic shunt: the gun-sight approach. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1996;7:139–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Raza SA, Walser E, Hernandez A, Chen K, Marroquin S. Transhepatic puncture of portal and hepatic veins for TIPS using a single-needle pass under sonographic guidance. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:W87–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Boyvat F, Harman A, Ozyer U, Aytekin C, Arat Z. Percutaneous sonographic guidance for TIPS in Budd–Chiari syndrome: direct simultaneous puncture of the portal vein and inferior vena cava. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;191:560–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gazzera C, Fonio P, Gallesio C, et al. Ultrasound-guided transhepatic puncture of the hepatic veins for TIPS placement. Radiol Med. 2013;118:379–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christophe Cassinotto.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Informed Consent

The institutional review board approved this study and waived the informed consent requirement because of the retrospective nature of the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schembri, V., Cassinotto, C., Panaro, F. et al. Challenging TIPS in Liver Transplant Recipients: The Pull-Through Technique to Address Piggyback Anastomosis. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 41, 804–810 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1886-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-018-1886-3

Keywords

Navigation