Advertisement

CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology

, Volume 41, Issue 3, pp 363–365 | Cite as

DAWN: Another Boost for Endovascular Thrombectomy in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke

Editorial

Klaus A. Hausegger, CVIR Editor-in-Chief

Raman Uberoi, CVIR Deputy Editor

Very recently, the results of the DAWN trial were published [1]. The results of this prospective randomized trial are of major interest for two reasons: first, it has been shown that patients with an occlusion of the internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery may benefit from endovascular thrombectomy with an extended time window of up to 24 h after the onset of stroke symptoms. The previously published positive randomized trials limited the time window to a maximum of 12 h, with no clear indication as to whether patients presenting with a wake-up stroke or an unknown time window should be treated at all [2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8].

Second, a mismatch between the clinical stroke presentation and infarct volume was one major inclusion criterion. The infarct volume was determined either by MR diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) or CT perfusion (CTP), and an infarct volume of 51 ml maximum was accepted. In...

References

  1. 1.
    Nogueira RG, Jadhav AP, Haussen DC, For the DAWN Trial Investigators, et al. Thrombectomy 6 to 24 hours after stroke with a mismatch between deficit and infarct. N Engl J Med. 2018;378:11–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Berkhemer OA, Fransen PSS, Beumer D, For the MR CLEAN Investigators, et al. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Campbell BCV, Mitchell PJ, Kleinig TJ, For the EXTEND-IA Investigators, et al. Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selectin. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1009–18.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Goyal M, Demchuk AM, Menon BK, For the ESCAPE Trial Investigators, et al. Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1019–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Saver JL, Goyal M, Bonafe A, For the SWIFT PRIME Investigators, et al. Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2285–95.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jovin TG, Chamorro A, Cobo E, For the REVASCAT Trial Investigators, et al. Thrombectomy within 8 Hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:2296–306.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bracard S, Ducrocq X, Mas JL, Soudant M, Oppenheim C, Moulin T, Guillemin F, For the THRACE investigators. Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016;15:1138–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mocco J, Zaidat OO, von Kummer R, For the THERAPY Trial Investigators*, et al. Aspiration thrombectomy after intravenous Alteplase versus intravenous Alteplase alone. Stroke. 2016;47:2331–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Berlis A, Weber W. Nationwide care for acute ischemic stroke patients is ensured by radiologists and neuroradiologists. Rofo. 2017;189:303–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lenthall R, McConachie N, White P, Clifton A, Rowland-Hill C, UK Neurointerventional Group and British Society of Neuroradiologists. BSNR training guidance for mechanical thrombectomy. Clin Radiol. 2017;72:175e11–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lavine SD, Cockroft K, Hoh B, Bambakidis N, Khalessi AA, Woo H, Riina H, Siddiqui A, Hirsch JA, Chong W, Rice H. Training guidelines for endovascular ischemic stroke intervention: an international multi-society consensus document. Int Neuroradiol. 2016;22:256–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fiehler J, Cognard C, Gallitelli M, Jansen O, Kobayashi A, Mattle HP, Muir KW, Mazighi M, Schaller K, Schellinger PD. European recommendations on organisation of interventional care in acute stroke (EROICAS). Int J Stroke. 2016;11:701–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Fortea F, Masjuan J, Arikán-Abello F, et al. Criteria for training and accreditation in interventional neuroradiology-neurointervention, approved by the Spanish group of interventional neuroradiology (GENI), the Spanish society of neuro radiology (SENR), the Spanish group of cerebrovascular diseases (GEECV), the Spanish society of neurology (SEN), and the vascular disease specialists in the Spanish society of neurosurgery (SENEC). Requirements for accreditation in interventional neuroradiology-neurointervention for institutions and specialists. Neurologia. 2017;32:106–12.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Reekers J (2017) Member of the UEMS council. Personal communication.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature and the Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiological Society of Europe (CIRSE) 2018

Personalised recommendations